RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN >> 2015, Vol. 24 >> Issue (10): 1793-1798.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201510023

Previous Articles     Next Articles

THRESHOLD DIAGNOSIS AND HAZARD DANGEROUSNESS EVALUATION FOR THE DISASTER OF DROUGHT-FLOOD ABRUPT ALTERNATION IN THE MIDDLE AND LOWER REACHES OF THE YANGTZE RIVER

JI Zhong-hui1,2, SHAN Hai-yan2   

  1. 1. Collaborative Innovation Center on Climate and Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, China;
    2. School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, China
  • Received:2014-12-25 Revised:2015-04-09 Online:2015-10-20

Abstract: Based on the related impact factors of the precipitation anomaly in summer in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River, 15 atmospheric circulation indicators as the independent variables and the hazard dangerousness level of drought-flood abrupt alternation index as the dependent variable were selected to construct the nonlinear and non-parametric classification and regression tree (CART) model for the hazard evaluation. The time series of data is from 1954 to 2010. Results showed that Arctic Oscillation Indices in summer (AOI_SU) and spring (AOI_SP), Asia Meridional Circulation Index in spring (AMCI_SP), and Asia Polar Vortex Area Index in spring (APVAI_SP) were the four main impact factors, which were proved to be suitable for the hazard evaluation of disaster about drought-flood abrupt alternation through the CART model. The type of the disaster (flood to drought or drought to flood) and the predicted dangerousness level under different diagnosis conditions can also be obtained from the model. The diagnosis thresholds and dangerousness level as follows: 1) When AOI_SU more than 1.11, the disaster of the quick turn from flood to drought is more apt to happen (dangerousness level is 1). 2) When the AOI_SU is less than 1.11 and the AOI_SP is more than -1.11, the disaster of the abrupt alternation from drought to flood will occur (dangerousness level is 6). 3) When the AOI_SU is less than 1.11, the AOI_SP less than -1.11, and the AMCI_SP more than 61, the same situation will happen as the one before this, and the predicted level is 5.5. 4) When the AOI_SU is less than 1.11, the AOI_SP less than -1.11, and the AMCI_SP less than 57, the abrupt alternation from flood to drought will happen, and the predicted level is 1.29. 5) When the AOI_SU less than 1.11, the AOI_SP less than -1.11, the AMCI_SP between 57 and 61, and the APVAI_SP less than 172, the abrupt alternation from flood to drought will happen, and the predicted level is 2.1. The corresponding indicators from 2011 to 2013 were selected to verify the final model through the comparison between the predicted values and actual levels, and the model was proved to be reliable for the close values. The CART proposed in this study provides a new method that can predict the hazard dangerousness level from the disaster of drought-flood abrupt alternation in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River.

Key words: drought-flood abrupt alternation, hazard dangerousness evaluation, threshold diagnosis, CART, the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River

CLC Number: 

  • X4
[1] 牛建利,何紫云,张天宇,等.旱涝急转对生产、生活与生态的影响及应对措施效果分析——以安徽省巢湖市槐林镇为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2013,22(Z1):108-115.
[2] 邓 艳,陈小荣."旱涝急转"对水稻生长发育的影响及其有关问题的思考[J].生物灾害科学,2013,36(2):217-222.
[3] 唐慧芳,韩建刚.1994年夏季我国灾害性天气概述[J].中国减灾,1994,4 (4):6-9.
[4] 张 屏,汪付华,吴忠连,等.淮北市旱涝急转型气候规律分析[J].水利水电快报,2008,29:139-141.
[5] 沈柏竹,张世轩,杨涵洧,等.2011年春夏季长江中下游地区旱涝急转特征分析[J].物理学报,2012,62(10):1-11.
[6] 程 智,丁小俊,徐 敏,等.长江中下游地区典型旱涝急转气候特征研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2012,21(Z2):115-120.
[7] 吴志伟,李建平,何金海,等.大尺度大气环流异常与长江中下游夏季长周期旱涝急转[J].科学通报,2006,51 (14):1717-1724.
[8] 唐 明,邵东国,姚成林.沿淮淮北地区旱涝急转的成因及应对措施[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2007,5(1):26-32.
[9] 封国林,杨涵洧,张世轩,等.2011年春末夏初长江中下游地区旱涝急转成因初探[J].大气科学,2012,36(5):1009-1026.
[10] 刘凤丽.城市旱涝急转灾害机理及防涝减灾体系研究[J].水利科技与经济,2012,18(10):88-93.
[11] 李 迅,袁东敏,尹志聪,等.2011 年长江中下游旱涝急转成因初步分析[J].气候与环境研究,2014,19(1):41-50.
[12] SU B D.,GEMMER M,JIANG T.Spatial and temporal variation of extreme precipitation over the yangtze river basin[J].Quaternary International,2008,186:22-31.
[13] SAMIR C M,REINE P L,SONIA R G,et al.Assessing the impact of El niño modoki on seasonal precipitation in Colombia[J].Global and Planetary Change,2015,124:41-61.
[14] TACHIIRI K,SHINODA M.Quantitative risk assessment for future meteorological disasters reduced livestock mortality in Mongolia[J].Climatic Change,2011,113(3-4):867-882.
[15] JI Z H,LI N,XIE W,et al.Comprehensive assessment of flood risk with classification and regression tree method[J].Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment,2013,27:1815-1828.
[16] MCKEE T B,DOESKEN N J,Kleist J.The Relationship of Drought Frequency and Duration to Time Scales[R].California:Eighth Conference on Applied Climatology,1993:179-184.
[17] TACHIIRI K,SHINODA M,KLINKENBERG B,et al.Assessing Mongolian snow disaster risk using livestock and satellite data[J].J Arid Environ,2008,72:2251-2263
[18] 龚道溢,朱锦红,王绍武.长江流域夏季降水与前期北极涛动的显著相关[J].科学通报,2002,47(7):546-549.
[19] 郭 玲,何金海,祝从文.影响长江中下游夏季降水的前期潜在预报因子评估[J].大气科学,2012,36(2):337-349.
[1] SHAN Li-jie, ZHANG Li-ping, CHEN Xin-chi, YANG Wei. SPATIO-TEMPORAL EVOLUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF DROUGHT- FLOOD ABRUPT ALTERNATION IN THE MIDDLE AND LOWER REACHES OF THE YANGTZE RIVER BASIN [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2015, 24(12): 2100-2107.
[2] WANG Rong, ZOU Xu-kai. An analysis on the change characteristics of consecutive rainfall in the middle and lower reaches of the yangtze river [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2015, 24(09): 1483-1490.
[3] WANG Xue-lei, XU Hou-ze,CAI Shu-ming. WETLAND PROTECTION AND BASIN MANAGEMENT IN THE MIDDLE AND LOWER REACHES OF THE YANGTZE RIVER [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2006, 15(5): 564-568.
[4] JIANG Jia-hu, HUANG Qun, SUN Zhan-dong. COUNTERMEASURES FOR PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT OF LAKES IN MIDDLE AND LOWER REACHES OF THE YANGTZE RIVER [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2005, 14(1): 40-43.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] CHENG Jiang, HE Qing, WANG Yuan-ye, LIU Hong, XIA Xiao-ming. SPECTRUM ANALYSIS OF FLOCS DIAMETER IN THE CHANGJIANG ESTUARY[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2005, 14(4): 460 -464 .
[2] PENG Jian, JING Juan, WU Jian-sheng, JIANG Yi-yi, ZHANG Yuan. EVALUATION ON RURAL INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE——A CASE STUDY IN YONGSHENG COUNTY, YUNNAN PROVINCE[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2005, 14(4): 413 .
[3] . [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2004, 13(1): 100 .
[4] DUAN Hua-Hua, Wang-Zhao-Yi, Tu-Guo-An. ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE YANGTZE RIVER ECOSYSTEM WITH BENTHIC INVERTEBRATE AS INDICATOR SPECIES[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2009, 18(3): 241 -247 .
[5] WANG Hong-Wei. RESEARCH ON LAW OF PREVENTING AND CONTROLLING POLLUTED SOIL IN RUSSIA AND ITS REVELATIONS OVER CONSTRUCTING LAW OF PREVENTING AND CONTROLLING POLLUTED SOIL IN CHINA[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2009, 18(4): 326 .
[6] LIU Bei-Bei, Li-Feng-Yang, Shu-Qin-Qin, Xu-Xiang-, Bi-Jun-. STUDY ON URBAN ENVIRONMENTAL EQUALITY OF THE YANGTZE RIVER DELTA[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2009, 18(12): 1093 .
[7] HU Yan, GAO Dun-Feng, HUANG Jia-Cong. ECOSYSTEM SERVICE VALUATION OF TAIHU WETLAND[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2010, 19(06): 646 .
[8] TUN Jian-Nan, TAO Shi-Mou, CAO Wei-Hui, WANG Cheng-Xin. DIFFERENTIATION OF URBAN AND RURAL HARMONIOUS DEVELOPMENT IN THE YANGTZE RIVER DELTA URBAN AGGLOMERATION[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2010, 19(z1): 21 .
[9] SHI Chang-Xin. MAPPING THE SPECIFIC SEDIMENT YIELD IN THE UPPER YANGTZE RIVER AND SOME CHARACTERISTICS OF ITS SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2010, 19(11): 1322 .
[10] WU Hua-Jin, CENG Ju-Xin. PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION OF LIVABLE CITY GREEN SPACE[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2011, 20(1): 28 .