RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN >> 2024, Vol. 33 >> Issue (1): 150-162.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202401013

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Differences in N2O Spatio-temporal Distribution and Emission Reduction Potential in Three Gorges Reservoir Area

LI Dan-qing1,WANG Yun-qi1,2,WANG Zhen1,BAI Zhi-jie3,LI Hai-tao4   

  1. (1.Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100085,China;2.College of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, National Positioning Observation and Research Station of Forest Ecosystems in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Jinyun Mountain, Chongqing,Beijing 100083,China;3.Hulunbuir Agricultural Reclamation Group, Hulunbuir 021008,China;
    4.Hulunbuir Hydrographic Survey Bureau, Hulunbuir 021099,China)

  • Online:2024-01-20 Published:2024-02-01

Abstract: Nitrous oxide (N2O) is the world’s third largest greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) and is increasing year by year. The intensive development of agriculture and the advancement of urbanization in the Three Gorges reservoir area will also exacerbate N2O emissions. In order to understand the emission of N2O in the reservoir area and make suggestions for the low-carbon development.This study used the IPCC emission factor method and scenario analysis method to study the differences in N2O spatio-temporal distribution and to explore the emission reduction potential in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area.The results showed: (1) N2O emissions in the Three Gorges reservoir area remained at 14 700-16 200 t in 2006~2019. The overall emission trend was first higher and then decreased. The difference between 18 districts and counties in the reservoir area was significant (P<0.01), and the spatial distribution was random (annual average Moran I≈0 in the past 14 years). (2) Agricultural activities in the Three Gorges reservoir area were the main sources of N2O, while fertilizer application and fecal emissions contributed the most to N2O, accounting for 40.48% and 23.84%, respectively. By application of the STIRPAT model, it was found that among the driving factors of N2O emissions, the urbanization rate had constraining effects in the Three Gorges reservoir area, and the promotion factors from small to large were the grain output, the number of rural employees, the value-added of the primary industry and the per capita GDP. (3) The N2O emissions in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area in 2030 were predicted under three emission reduction scenarios. The forecast values were 15 500, 13 400 and 12 100 t, respectively.In view of the N2O emissions and future predictions in the Three Gorges reservoir area, it was recommended that the amount of nitrogen fertilizer applied in farmland be controlled, and the management of livestock and poultry manure be strengthened, in the hinterland of the reservoir area. It was also suggested that a new agricultural mode be established. The circulation mechanism in the process of emission reduction should be further explored. Joint efforts should be considered in the future to control N2O emissions.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] GUO Zheng, , DONG Ping, , LU Yuqi, , , HUANG Qunfang, MA Yinyi. Analysis on the Evolution and Influence Factors of Yangtze River delta container port system[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[2] WU Wenqi, , LUO Xian, , HUANG Wei, LI Yungang, . Research on the Water Resources Carrying Capacity and Its Temporal——Spatial Distribution Characteristics in Yunnan Province, China[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1385 .
[3] LI Jian-Bao, HUANG Xian-Jin, MENG Hao, ZHOU Yan, XU Guo-Liang, WU Chang-Yan. Analysis of Cumulative Target Completion Rate of Carbon Intensity in China During the Period of “Twelfth Five-Year”[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(08): 1655 .
[4] LI En-kang, LU Yu-qi, WANG Yi, HUANG Qun-fang, GUO Zheng. Impact of Urbanization on Institutional Transformation:Analysis of Impulse Response Function Based on 13 Cities In Jiangsu Province[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(09): 1919 -1927 .
[5] LI Jia-yi, KUANG Hong-hai, TAN Chao, WANG Pei-pei.  

Spatio-Temporal Characteristics and Ecological Response of Urban Expansion in the Yangtze River Economic Zone [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(10): 2153 -2161 .

[6] . [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, , (): 0 .
[7] TANG Zijun, CHEN Long, QIN Jun, ZHENG Xiang . Numerical Simulation of the Local Flow Field and the Boundary Layer Structure in the Pollution Process in Wuhan[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(11): 2540 -2547 .
[8] WANG Dongxiang, ZHANG Yiming, WANG Ruicheng, ZHAO Bingyan, ZHANG Zhiqi, HUANG Xianyu, . Characteristics of Dissolved Organic Matter in Pore Water from the Dajiuhu Peatland, Central China[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(11): 2568 -2577 .
[9] TIAN Peng, LI Jia-lin, , SHI Xiao-li, WANG Li-jia, LIU Rui-qing. Spatial and Temporal Changes of Land Use Pattern and Ecological Risk Assessment in Zhejiang Province[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(12): 2697 -2706 .
[10] WANG Hai-li, HAN Guang-zhong, XIE Xian-jian. Spatiotemporal Pattern Evolvement Based on the DEA Model and Its Driving Factors of Arable Land Utilization Efficiency of the Southwest Region in China[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(12): 2784 -2795 .