RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN >> 2024, Vol. 33 >> Issue (12): 2551-2561.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202412001

    Next Articles

Evaluation of Urban Ecological Welfare Performance and Spatial Variability in the Yangtze River Economic Bel

YANG Jie1,2,3, LI Zhi-gang1,3   

  1. (1.College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059,China; 2.The Engineering & Technical College of Chengdu University of Technology, Leshan 614000,China; 3. Research Center for Protection Policy of Key Ecological Functional Areas in the Upper reaches of the Yangtze River, Chengdu 610059,China)
  • Online:2024-12-20 Published:2024-12-27

Abstract: Ecological welfare performance serves as a novel indicator for gauging regional green development, and is pivotal for scrutinizing the spatial distribution and variability characteristics of urban ecological welfare performance to facilitate zoning planning and management of urban ecological resources. Drawing upon input-output theory and incorporating undesired outputs of environmental pollution, we assessed the ecological welfare performance of cities within the Yangtze River Economic Belt utilizing the super-efficient SBM model. Subsequently, we analyzed its spatial distribution characteristics and conducted modeling analysis on the spatial variability. Our findings revealed that : (1)The ecological welfare performance of cities within the Yangtze River Economic Belt witnessed a significant increase of 33.3% since the inception of the development plan in 2016. (2)There existed a pronounced spatial clustering trend in ecological welfare performance among the cities, and is particularly notable in the marked enhancement in overall performance observed in the Yangtze River Delta region. (3)The spatial correlation range of urban ecological welfare performance gradually diminished over time, while the degree of variability remained relatively stable. Hence, it is imperative to reinforce ecological environmental governance to sustain the upward trajectory of performance. Drawing from the aforementioned conclusions, we propose countermeasures that focus on ecological environmental governance, ecological resource allocation and mechanism construction, and inter-city cooperation.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!