RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN >> 2006, Vol. 15 >> Issue (6): 751-751.

• Contents • Previous Articles     Next Articles

METHOD FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ECOLOGICAL ECONOMIC |SYSTEM ON THE BASIS OF ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT—A CASE IN FUNING COUNTY OF JIANGSU PROVINCE, CHINA

WANG Shuyu|BIAN Xinmin   

  • Received:2005-11-21 Revised:2006-01-17 Online:2006-11-20

Abstract:

The calculated area for cropland by Wackernagel's method does not consider the influence of cropping index. For this reason, the production in certain country or region is achieved by annual multiple cropping, and in some areas there is an abandon of cropland. The result of calculated land by this method in ecological footprint is the area of planting of crop but not of the cropland. From this view, Wackernagel's method enlarges or dwindles the ecological footprint what human need in fact. So, footprint of cropland is not in accordance with biocapacity of cropland, for the area of cropland in biocapacity is not planting. There is a logic error of ecological remainder / deficit for the identical problem of footprint and biocapacity. The paper improved the method of ecological footprint by regulated cropland area with cropping index. The result is the area of cropland that human needed, but not of cropping. Ecological supply/demand and development ability in Funing County of Jiangsu Province from 1995 to 2003 were analyzed with the improved method of ecological footprint. It is suggested that ecological remainder/ 10 000 yuan GDP as the indicator of regional sustainable development ability. From 1995 to 2003, ecological footprint in Funing County decreased from 1.1207 hm2 per capita to 2.434 0 hm2 per capita, ecological capacity per capita changed very little, ecological deficit increased from 0.8153 hm2 per capita to 2.017 2 hm2 per capita, development ability increased from 1.330 6 to 3.140 7, ecological deficit per 10 000 yuan GDP decreased from 1.226 5 hm2 to 0.495 7 hm2. The correlation index calculated by the improved ecological footprint method between development ability and GDP per capita is larger than that by the Wackernagel's method, indicating that the development ability based on the improved ecological footprint method may represent the social economic situation better than that based on Wackernagel's method.

Key words: ecological footprint, cropping index, ecological capacity, ecological remainder, ability of development

[1] LI Ying, LIN Wen-peng, ZONG Wei. DYNAMIC ANALYSIS ON THE REGIONAL ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT WITH A MODIFIED MODEL——A CASE STUDY OF NANTONG CITY, JIANGSU PROVINCE [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2017, 26(04): 500-507.
[2] ZHANG Tong, CHEN Shuang, YAO Shi-mou, GAO Qun, ZHANG Jia-qi. ANALYSIS ON THE SPATIAL-TEMPORAL CHARACTERISTICS AND DECOUPLING EFFECT OF ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN NANJING [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2017, 26(03): 350-358.
[3] HU Xue-ping, LI Dan-qing. A STUDY ON ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT'S DYNAMIC CHANGE AND INFLUENCE FACTORS IN THE PROGRESS OF NEW PATTERN URBANIZATION: A CASE OF ANHUI PROVINCE [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2016, 25(02): 300-306.
[4] TIAN Ling-ling, LUO Jing, DONG Ying, LIU He-tao, ZENG Ju-xin. TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL DYNAMIC RESEARCH OF THE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT AND ECOLOGICAL CARRYING CAPACITY OF HUBEI PROVINCE [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2016, 25(02): 316-325.
[5] LU Xin-hai, KE Shan-gan. ESTABLISHMENT OF REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES ECOLOGICAL COMPENSATION MODEL BASED ON ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT MODEL——TAKE THE YANGTZE RIVER FOR EXAMPLE [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2016, 25(02): 334-341.
[6] LONG Liang-jun, WANG Xia, GUO Bing. EVALUATION ON SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ECOLOGICAL WELLBEING PERFORMANCE——A CASE STUDY OF SHANGHAI [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2016, 25(01): 9-15.
[7] JIAO Wen-jun, MIN Qing-wen, LI Wen-hua, Anthony M. FULLER. MEASURING WATER ECOLOGICAL CARRYING CAPACITY WITH THE ECOSYSTEM-SERVICE-BASED ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT (ESEF) METHOD:AN APPLICATION IN HUZHOU CITY IN THE TAI LAKE BASIN [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2016, 25(01): 147-155.
[8] HU Hong-Xin-, He-Wei-, Chen-Gong-, Wang-Yu-. EVALUATION AND PREDICTION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF THE “TWO CIRCLES&rdquo|IN HUBEI PROVINCE [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2010, 19(04): 351-.
[9] TONG Yi-Qi. EVALUATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ZHEJIANG PROVINCE BASED ON LOCAL ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT MODEL [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2009, 18(10): 896-.
[10] LUO Luqin, ZHOU Jingxuan, LI Xiangmei. CONSTRUCTION AND ANALYSIS OF ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT DYNAMIC PREDICTION MODEL [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2008, 17(3): 440-440.
[11] LI Youhui, DONG Zengchuan,KONG Qiongju. IMPACTS OF LIAOFANG WATER PROJECT ON ECOLOGICAL CAPACITY OF FU RIVER BASIN [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2008, 17(1): 148-148.
[12] KOU Liuxiu, BAO Cunkuan, JIANG Dahe. APPLICATION OF ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR URBAN PLANNING [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2008, 17(1): 119-119.
[13] HU Haisheng,. ANALYSIS OF ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT OF HILLY AND BEAUTY SPOTS—A CASE STUDY OF LUSHAN, JIANGXI PROVINCE [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2007, 16(6): 814-814.
[14] TAN Man-zhi,CHEN Jie,TIAN Xiao-si,ZHANG Xue-lei. DYNAMICS AND FORECASTING OF AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT AND CARRYING CAPACITY DURING RAPID URBANIZATION PROCESS OF NANJING CITY [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2005, 14(6): 754-759.
[15] SHU Xiao-ming,YANG Da-yuan,DONG Jie. ANALYSIS OF ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN MOUNTAIN AREA——TAKING YUEXI COUNTY AS AN EXAMPLE [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2005, 14(2): 243-247.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!