RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (11): 2541-2550.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202011021

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of Ecological Restoration 10 Years After the “5.12” Wenchuan Earthquake

YANG Miao 1,2, JIANG La-hai 1,HOU Peng 3, ZHAI Jun 3, ZHU Han-shou 3, TAN Ting 1, LI Bo 1   

  1. (1.Sichuan Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China; 2.Research Center for
    Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100085,China;3.Ministry of
    Ecology and Environment Center for Statelite Application on Ecologyand Environment, Beijing 100090,China)
  • Online:2020-11-20 Published:2020-12-17

Abstract: Ten years after the Wenchuan earthquake, the types and qualities of ecosystem, community structures,pland biodiversity and soil nutrient recovery conditions were comprehensively assessed at the most severely affected areas. Through the Remote interpretation of ecosystem types, the sample survey of ground vegetation, the inversion of GPP and LAI, as well as the determination of the soil organic matter, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, total potassium, available nitrogen, available phosphorus, and available potassium in the soil. The results exhibited that the regional ecological system generally tends to incline towards stability and positive recovery according to the remote sensing interpretations. Although the bare surface area assessed in 2017 was higher compared to the one before the earthquake in 2007, the decrease in number is relative to the post-earthquake one in 2008. In terms of ecosystem quality, the average values received from GPP and LAI continuously rose after 2014 though quite slowly. It reflected the overall resilience of the regional ecosystem. However, some of the forest ecosystems damaged by the earthquake still have not returned to the original state. A part of the farmland in the Chengdu Plain has been converted into an urban construction land. By 2017 in the earthquake-damaged area, there was a significant increase in the number of plant species, dominated by pioneer species, such as Rosaceae, Compositae, and Gramineae, similar results as to those in 2009. The community structure found at the earthquake-damaged area has been well restored. In terms of vertical stratification, the community structure of the remaining areas has formed three layers of trees-shrub-herb, noting that there is only one layer of herb or shrub and herb combination in the arid valley area. Generally, the soil fertility condition at the control spot was proved healthier compared to the impaired areas where the situation continued to deteriorate. The bare soil area that was caused by the earthquake has shown an acceleration in the mineralization process, increasing content of available nutritional elements in the impaired sites achieved short-term yet the loss of nutrients and soil fertility proved to be taxing long-term. Hence, there have been formulations of numerous suggestions: Based on strengthening the supervision of geological hazards and preventing secondary disasters, the natural vegetation must be dominated by natural restoration in the high precipitation areas of Western China, in front of Longmen Mountain. The arid valley area is able to adapt the appropriate artificial restoration measures which follow the principle of "adaptation to local conditions and matching trees with the site", Meanwhile, the improvement of soil nutrient conditions and the promotion of vegetation restoration must be given more emphasis and attention. In the process of urban construction, on the other hand, the land and space management and essential farmland protection must be strengthened, so as the red line of ecological protection, as well as all kinds of protected areas, including basic farmland.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] DU Tao1, XIONG Lihua1, YI Fanghui2, XIAO Yi2, SONG Qiuming1. RELATION OF THE WATER AREA OF DONGTING LAKE TO THE WATER LEVELS OF HYDROLOGICAL STATIONS BASED ON MODIS IMAGES[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2012, 21(06): 756 .
[2] YUAN Xi, HUANG Ying-ping, JIANG Qing, JING Jin-jie, GAO Yong, TU Zhi-ying. ADVANCES OF STUDIES ON PHYSIOLOGICAL AND ECOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR OF JUVENILE CHINESE STURGEON[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2016, 25(03): 429 -438 .
[3] . EVOLUTION OF ECOSYSTEM RESILIENCE IN MOUNTAINOUS CITIES OF KARST——TAKING GUIYANG URBAN AREA AS AN EXAMPLE[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 0, (): 0 .
[4] BI Xue-cheng, GU Ren-xu, SU Qin.  

Regional Industrial Specialization, Co-opetition Relations and Division of Labor in the manufacturing industryEconometric Analysis Based on Panel Data in Jiangsu Province [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(10): 2201 -2213 .

[5] WANG Quan, LI Yang-bing, LIU Ya-xiang. Comparative Study of Land Use Change in Karst Hillside-Trough Dam Area[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(01): 122 -133 .
[6] YANG Gao-sheng, XIE Qiu-hao. Study on Spatial and Temporal Differentiation of Green Water Resources Efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(02): 349 -358 .
[7] YAN Dong-sheng, WANG Hui, SUN Wei. Research on Driving Factors Evolution of Regional Development Gap in the Yangtze River Delta[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(03): 517 -529 .
[8] YANG Zi-jiang, HAN Wei-chao, YANG En-xiu. A System Dynamic Model and Simulation for Water Resources Carrying Capacity in Kunming[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(03): 594 -602 .
[9] YUAN Hua-xi, , LIU Yao-bin, , HU Sen-lin, FENG Yi-dai. Does Industrial Agglomeration Aggravate Environmental Pollution: From A Perspective of Foreign Direct Investment[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(04): 794 -804 .
[10] ZANG Man-dan, LOU Zi-meng, KONG Jia-jing. Spatial-temporal Differentiation of Interprovincial Water Well-being Performance in China[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(04): 805 -816 .