RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (12): 2982-2991.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202112017

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of Eco-compensation Policy on Farmers' Willing and Behavior of Wetlands Ecological Protection:Based on Poyang Lake

PANG Jie1,2, QIU Shui-lin1,3, JIN Le-shan1,3   

  1. (1.College of Humanities and Development Studies,China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193,China; 2.Research Center for
     Rural Economy,Beijing 100810,China; 3. China Eco-compensation Policy Research Center, Beijing 100193,China)
  • Online:2021-12-20 Published:2022-01-07

Abstract: Wetland eco-compensation is an important policy tool to solve the problems of wetland ecological environment and effectively alleviate the contradiction between wetland protection and development and utilization, but the eco-compensation policy with the government as the main body often ignores and weakens the rights and interests of farmers. This paper theoretically analyzes the impact of eco-compensation on the willingness and behavior of farmers to protect wetlands, and reveals that the eco-compensation policy can influence the behavioral willingness of the group to form the herd effect, so as to make more farmers participate in the transformation of wetland protection. Taking Poyang lake wetland as an example, this paper introduces the eco-compensation policy, adopts the extended planning behavior theory and structural equation model, and makes an empirical analysis on the impact of eco-compensation policy and psychological factors on farmers’ wetland protection intentions and behaviors. Results showed that: (1) the eco-compensation policy can not only effectively motivate farmers directly participate in the wetland protection, can also through the positive influence on wetland protection will indirectly encourage farmers to participate in the wetland protection, but compared with effects on the wetland protection will significant under 1% level, eco-compensation policies directly affect the effect of wetland protection action only by under 5%, that eco-compensation policies for wetland protection behavior of incentive effect has not been fully play, there is further room for improvement. (2) the psychological variables of local farmers (behavior attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavior control) have a significant positive impact on the wetland protection intention of farmers, and indirectly affect the wetland protection behavior of farmers by influencing the wetland protection intention. (3) the direct effect of farmers' willingness to protect wetlands on their protection behavior is 0.640, and ecological compensation policies, psychological variables and other factors will indirectly affect wetland protection behavior through their willingness to protect wetlands, which fully demonstrates the importance of their willingness to protect wetlands on their protection behavior. Based on the results of the study, policy suggestions were put forward to improve farmers’ willingness and behavior of wetland protection from the perspective of adjusting wetland eco-compensation policy and strengthening farmers' psychological variables.


No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] ZHANG Xin, CHEN Zhigang . Economic Growth Incentive, Local Officials’ Characteristics and Urban Industrial Pollution:#br# A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1314 .
[2] GUO Zheng, , DONG Ping, , LU Yuqi, , , HUANG Qunfang, MA Yinyi. Analysis on the Evolution and Influence Factors of Yangtze River delta container port system[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[3] LAN Xi, LIU Xiaoqiong, GUO Yan, CHEN Kunlun . Comprehensive Evaluation of Urban Water Environmental Carrying Capacity in Wuhan Under the Context of the Yangtze River Economic Belt Strategic[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[4] LUO Nengsheng, WANG Yuze, PENG Yu, LI Jianming. EcoEfficiency of Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Yangtze River Basin: Spatial Analysis and Synergetic Promotion Mechanism[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[5] LIU Gang, , LIU Kunlin, WANG Weiqian, ZHAO Shuang. Analysis of Immigrants’ Satisfaction Degree in Water Quality#br# —— Empirical Research of Ordinal Logistic Regression[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1355 .
[6] Xiaofeng, , LIU Dingshuo, . Coupling Mechanism of County Traffic Accessibility and Spatial Poverty Based on 3D Theory and SEM: A Case Study in Mountains Border Regions of Western Yunnan[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1360 .
[7] ZHANG Dapeng, CAO Weidong, , YAO Zhaozhao, YUE Yang, REN Yawen. Study on the Distribution Characteristics and Evolution of Logistics Enterprises in Shanghai Metropolitan Area[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1365 .
[8] SHE Ying, , LIU Yaobing. Historical Context and Enlightenment of Domestic and Foreign Green Development Regime[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1370 .
[9] HOU Wenjia, CHEN Changqing, QIAO Hui, SUN Xinsu, ZHOU Shudong. TemporalSpatial Characteristics of Rape Freezing Injury in the Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River During 1980-2009[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1375 .
[10] YAO Lin, SHEN Jing, WEN Xinlong, GAO Chao. Impact of Various Parameterization Schemes in WRF Model on Wind Simulation at the mountain Wind Power Station of Jiangxi Province[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1380 .