RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (12): 3004-3016.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202112019

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Does Social Interaction Promote the Adoption of Farmers′ Soil  and Water Conservation Technologies?

GAO Tian-zhi,LU Qian   


  1. (College of Economics and Management, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, China)
  • Online:2021-12-20 Published:2022-01-07

Abstract: Based on the survey data of 1195 farmers in the Loess Plateau, the analysis framework of social interaction-trust-soil conservation technology was constructed. The exploration factor, binary logistic regression and KHB method were used to analyze and test the role and influence of social interaction on farmers' adoption of soil and water conservation technology. mechanism. The study found that: (1)The five dimensions of social interaction directly affect farmers' adoption of soil and water conservation technologies, and play an important role in improving the adoption rate of agricultural technology and improving the ecological environment; (2)Social interaction indirectly affects farmers through interpersonal trust, network trust and government trust. The use of soil and water conservation technology; (3)The total indirect effect of trust (0.735 3) is greater than the direct effect of social interaction (0.576 3), in which the interpersonal trust has the largest indirect effect value (0.394 7), the government trust second (0.220 3), the network trust is minimal (0.120 3). The study deepened the understanding of the relationship between farmers and the adoption of soil and water conservation technology, and suggested that the relevant departments should give full play to the positive role of social interaction and trust when formulating targeted policies in economic and social development and ecological security.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] ZHANG Xin, CHEN Zhigang . Economic Growth Incentive, Local Officials’ Characteristics and Urban Industrial Pollution:#br# A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1314 .
[2] GUO Zheng, , DONG Ping, , LU Yuqi, , , HUANG Qunfang, MA Yinyi. Analysis on the Evolution and Influence Factors of Yangtze River delta container port system[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[3] LAN Xi, LIU Xiaoqiong, GUO Yan, CHEN Kunlun . Comprehensive Evaluation of Urban Water Environmental Carrying Capacity in Wuhan Under the Context of the Yangtze River Economic Belt Strategic[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[4] LUO Nengsheng, WANG Yuze, PENG Yu, LI Jianming. EcoEfficiency of Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Yangtze River Basin: Spatial Analysis and Synergetic Promotion Mechanism[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[5] LIU Gang, , LIU Kunlin, WANG Weiqian, ZHAO Shuang. Analysis of Immigrants’ Satisfaction Degree in Water Quality#br# —— Empirical Research of Ordinal Logistic Regression[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1355 .
[6] Xiaofeng, , LIU Dingshuo, . Coupling Mechanism of County Traffic Accessibility and Spatial Poverty Based on 3D Theory and SEM: A Case Study in Mountains Border Regions of Western Yunnan[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1360 .
[7] ZHANG Dapeng, CAO Weidong, , YAO Zhaozhao, YUE Yang, REN Yawen. Study on the Distribution Characteristics and Evolution of Logistics Enterprises in Shanghai Metropolitan Area[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1365 .
[8] SHE Ying, , LIU Yaobing. Historical Context and Enlightenment of Domestic and Foreign Green Development Regime[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1370 .
[9] HOU Wenjia, CHEN Changqing, QIAO Hui, SUN Xinsu, ZHOU Shudong. TemporalSpatial Characteristics of Rape Freezing Injury in the Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River During 1980-2009[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1375 .
[10] YAO Lin, SHEN Jing, WEN Xinlong, GAO Chao. Impact of Various Parameterization Schemes in WRF Model on Wind Simulation at the mountain Wind Power Station of Jiangxi Province[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1380 .