RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (2): 345-357.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202202009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

System Dynamics Simulation and Control Strategy of Water Environment Carrying Capacity in Baiyangdian Basin Based on Industry Refinement and Multifactor Constraint

CHEN Wen-ting1,2,3, ZHENG Ming-xia2, XIA Qing2, SU Jing2, XI Bei-dou1,2, XIANG Wei2,YU Min-da2, FU Xue-mei2   

  1. (1.School of Water Resources and Environment, China University of Geosciences(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;2.State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Simulation and Control of Groundwater Pollution, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China;3.Geological Engineering Department, Qinghai University, Xining 810016,China)
  • Online:2022-02-20 Published:2022-03-21

Abstract: In order to coordinate the development between water environment carrying capacity and regional economy, the system dynamics method (SD) was used to model the water environment carrying capacity in Baiyangdian Basin which includes 17 refined industrial industries and is constrained by multiple factors of water resources, water pollution and water ecology. Thirty-two sensitive indicators were obtained from sensitivity analysis of SD. Taking local practical development demand into consideration, 6 control scenarios which are applicable to the carrying capacity of water environment in Baiyangdian Basin were set, and the simulation along with the regulation results of water environment carrying capacity from 2017 to 2035 in Baiyangdian Basin were obtained: (1) If the present status is maintained, population and economic growth will arouse increasing demand for water resources and bring more water pollutants. Consequently, there will be a water resource gap which may further increase after 2020 and the water pollution will be worsen after 2021. (2)Compared with the current scenario, industrial structure adjustment or water environment protection could improve the overload of water environment in Baiyangdian Basin by 10.78% or 10.42% and increase the GDP by 0.22% or 0.26% in the future. However, the sustainable development scenario which considers the coordinated development of economy and environment is more favorable. When the GDP increases by 0.22%, the improvement of the water environment overload situation could reach 16.23%, which means the improvement effect is more distinct. If more stringent water environment protection measures are taken, the improvement effect may reach 34.56%, but the GDP will decrease by 5.06%, and the economic development will be greatly restricted. (3)Based on the above analysis, the overall planning must be conducted. High-end, high-tech and service industries should be vigorously developed, the scale of primary and secondary industries should be rationally reduced, and the scale of livestock breeding should be regulated. Meanwhile, the development scale of high water consumption and heavy pollution industry such as textile, paper and paper products should be restrained while cleaner production technology for industry improvement and innovation should be adopted. Multiple water supply mechanism should also be established to guarantee the water level in Baiyangdian and reduce groundwater exploitation. Water pollution treatment facilities and the rate of water resource utilization and sewage reuse should all be improved too. Moreover, forests and wetlands need to be restored and high-standard pollution control should be performed in Baiyangdian Basin so as to coordinate the development of economy, population and environment.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] LI Jian-Bao, HUANG Xian-Jin, MENG Hao, ZHOU Yan, XU Guo-Liang, WU Chang-Yan. Analysis of Cumulative Target Completion Rate of Carbon Intensity in China During the Period of “Twelfth Five-Year”[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(08): 1655 .
[2] XIONG Hong-bin, ZHOU Ling-yan. Using PSR-grey Target Model to Assess Ecological and Environmental Impact of Flood Regulation Project At Riparian Zone Around Lake Chaohu[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(09): 1977 -1987 .
[3] WANG Kai, WANG Yujie, WANG Bin, ZHANG Shouhong, WANG Yunqi, WANG Chenfeng. Study on Soil Detachment Rate on a YellowSoil Hillslope[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(09): 2114 -2121 .
[4] LI Jia-yi, KUANG Hong-hai, TAN Chao, WANG Pei-pei.  

Spatio-Temporal Characteristics and Ecological Response of Urban Expansion in the Yangtze River Economic Zone [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(10): 2153 -2161 .

[5] TANG Zijun, CHEN Long, QIN Jun, ZHENG Xiang . Numerical Simulation of the Local Flow Field and the Boundary Layer Structure in the Pollution Process in Wuhan[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(11): 2540 -2547 .
[6] WANG Dongxiang, ZHANG Yiming, WANG Ruicheng, ZHAO Bingyan, ZHANG Zhiqi, HUANG Xianyu, . Characteristics of Dissolved Organic Matter in Pore Water from the Dajiuhu Peatland, Central China[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(11): 2568 -2577 .
[7] WANG Hai-li, HAN Guang-zhong, XIE Xian-jian. Spatiotemporal Pattern Evolvement Based on the DEA Model and Its Driving Factors of Arable Land Utilization Efficiency of the Southwest Region in China[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(12): 2784 -2795 .
[8] WANG Cong-cong, WANG Yi-cheng, MA Ren-feng, WANG Jing-min. Impact of Economic Agglomeration on Pollution of Smog Based on Spatial Econometric Model:The Case Study of Yangtze River Delta[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(01): 1 -11 .
[9] ZHAO Shu-cheng, ZHANG Zhan-yu, XIA Ji-hong, YANG Jie, SHENG Li-ting, TANG Dan, CHEN Xiao-an, . Phosphorus Adsorption Characteristics of Riparian Soils Surrounding Poyang Lake[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(01): 166 -174 .
[10] RUAN Tian, ZHA Qian-yu, YANG Ru, GAO Chao. Effects on Runoff Above the Cuntan Station Area in the Yangtze River Basin Under the 1.5℃ and 2.0℃ Global Warming[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(02): 407 -415 .