RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (4): 927-936.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202204019

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on Farmers′ Cultivated Land Protection Willingness and Behavior Paradox Using Logit and Interpretive Structural Model: Example from Wuhan Metropolitan Area

CHEN Yin-rong,WANG Xiao-mei, MEI Yun   

  1. (College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China) 
  • Online:2022-04-20 Published:2022-04-21

Abstract: Converting farmers′ cultivated land protection willingness into behavior, and unifying their willingness and behavior, is one of the effective measures to solve the problem of cultivated land protection. In this paper, the theory of social embeddedness is applied to farmers' cultivated land protection. Firstly use Logit model to measure the degree of social embedded factors influencing farmers′ cultivated land protection willingness and behavior paradox, and then use interpretive structural model to further analyze the relationship and hierarchy between the various factors. The results show that: (1) Farmers′ education level, employment status, percentage of agricultural income, arable land area, policy propaganda, economic output value cognition, social security value cognition, interpersonal trust, institutional trust, strong connection network have a significant impact on the occurrence mechanism of paradox between farmers′ cultivated land protection willingness and behavior. (2) The education level, employment status, cultivated land area and policy propaganda are deep-rooted factors. These root factors affect the percentage of agricultural income, interpersonal trust, institutional trust and strong connection network. Economic output value cognition, social security value cognition are the direct surface factors that directly drive the occurrence of paradox between farmers′ cultivated land protection willingness and behavior.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . Analysis on the Trend and Influencing Factors of PM2.5 in China Based on Multi-source Remote Sensing Data[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, , (): 0 .
[2] . Analysis of the impact of natural disasters on agricultural insurance——Based on the microscopic survey data in HuBei province[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, , (): 0 .
[3] SHEN Xue, ZHANG Lu, ZHANG Junbiao, LUO Lanling. Influencing Factors and Guiding Strategies for Lowcarbon Production in Rice Planting: Multiplegroup Analysis Using Interpersonal Behavior Improvement Theory[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(09): 2042 -2052 .
[4] MA Kun, TANG Xiaolan, LIU Siyuan, WANG Yiwen, REN Yujie, LIU Xiaohan. Study on Spatial Distribution Characteristics of National Protected Areas and the Space Strategy of National Park Corridor in the Yangtze River Basin#br#[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(09): 2053 -2069 .
[5] WANG Kai, WANG Yujie, WANG Bin, ZHANG Shouhong, WANG Yunqi, WANG Chenfeng. Study on Soil Detachment Rate on a YellowSoil Hillslope[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(09): 2114 -2121 .
[6] PAN Cao, ZHOU Chi, MIAO Teng, LIU LinFeng, GAO Jian, QIAO YiYing, LI Zhu, ZHANG JiaMin, WANG HuiJun, XU DeXiong. Macrozoobenthic Community Structure and Water Quality Bioassessment of Four Rivers in Western Hubei Province, Yangtze River Basin[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(11): 2529 -2539 .
[7] CHANG Hua-yi, ZHANG Jun-biao, , HE Ke, . Technology Perception and Biological Pesticides Adoption[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(01): 202 -211 .
[8] LI Jing-bao, YU Dan-dan, ZHANG Rui, YANG Bo, DAI Wen, HE Meng, XU Zhi. Evolution Characteristics of River Network of the Three Estuaries of Southern Jing River in the Past 61 Years[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(05): 1214 -1224 .
[9] . Spatio-temporal Evolution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Land Ecological Security in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, , (): 0 .
[10] WANG Deng-qiang, GAO Lei , DUAN Xin-bin, CHEN Da-qing, MENG Qiu, , LIU Shao-ping. Preliminary Analysis of the Fish Larvae and Eggs and the Effects of the Eco-operation of Cascade Reservoirs on Fish Propagation in the Lower Hanjiang River[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(08): 1909 -1917 .