RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN >> 2024, Vol. 33 >> Issue (2): 322-335.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202402008

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Policy-oriented Land Use Simulation and Ecosystem Service Value Assessment in the Minjiang River Basin

WANG Meng-chao1,2,GAO Cheng1,2,PAN Hong-yi1,2,YAO Cai-yi1,2, HE Yan-mei1,2,CHENG Jian-xiong1,2,ZHANG Tian-yi1,2   

  1. (1.Sichuan Normal University, College of Geography and Resource Science, Chengdu 610066, China;
    2.Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Monitoring, Ministry of Education, Southwest Sichuan ,Chengdu 610066, China)
  • Online:2024-02-20 Published:2024-03-06

Abstract: Effective measurement and assessment of ecosystem service values are crucial for formulating ecological compensation, land remediation policies, and improving human welfare. Taking the Minjiang River Basin as the study area, based on the three periods of land use data in 2000, 2010, and 2020, the PLUS model and the dynamic equivalent method were applied to quantitatively assess the ecosystem service value of the study area in 2030. Additionally, the study formed a policy-oriented scenario based on the key indicator of arable land quality in arable land protection as an orientation. It was then analyzed in comparison with the simulation of ecological service value under the natural development scenario. The results showed that: (1)The spatial distribution pattern of land use in the Minjiang River Basin in 2030 remained consistent across different scenarios, but the trends in land use change differed. In the policy-oriented scenario, the growth rate of construction land area was effectively controlled, there was a shift from a decrease to an increase in the area of woodland and grassland. The decrease rate of arable land area was significantly slowed down. Compared with the natural scenario, 90.94 km2 of arable land of average grade or higher was protected from encroachment, ensuring the effective preservation of arable land quality; (2) In 2030, the ecological service value of the Minjiang River Basin would be 133.459 billion yuan under the natural development scenario and 134.765 billion yuan under the policy-oriented scenario. The spatial distribution showed higher values in the northern and southwestern regions, and lower values in the central and southeastern regions. In the policy-oriented scenario, the range and concentration of cold spots of ecological service value changes were significantly reduced compared with the natural development scenario, and the loss of value was effectively mitigated; (3) The interconversion of cropland and forest land was the main source of contribution to future ESV gains and losses in the Minjiang River Basin, and the contribution of cropland to construction land was significantly lower under the policy-oriented scenario, compared with the natural scenario, at 4.3%. The results of the study can provide theoretical references and assist in decision making for the construction of ecological civilization and sustainable development strategies in the Minjiang River Basin.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] ZHAO Men-men, FENG Li, GUO Song, TIAN Hui-hui. Impacts of Landscape Patterns on the Dynamic Changes of Thermal Comfort in Nanjing City[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(08): 1712 .
[2] YANG Jia, GE Xin, WU Qixin. Temporal and Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Air Quality Index in Guiyang,China[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(08): 1827 .
[3] DAI Pei, YAN Mingjun, ZHOU You, ZHOU Yanfeng, XIONG Manhui , LU Jianda, LIU Kai.  

Ecological Characteristics of Phytoplankton Community Structure in the Littoral Zone of Lake Wuli, Lake Taihu in 2014-2015 [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(10): 2348 -2357 .

[4] ZHOU Sheng-lv, LI Yue-han, HU Jing, FENG Jing-nan. Willing-To-Pay For Improvement of Air Quality in Shanghai Based on  Questionnaire Survey[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(11): 2419 -2424 .
[5] QU Xiao-e. Regional Differentials and Influence Factors of Eco-efficiency in China: an Empirical Analysis Based on the Perspective of Spatio-temporal Differences[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(12): 2673 -2683 .
[6] LIU Ju, FU Bin, ZHANG Cheng-hu, HU Zhi-peng, WANG Yu-kuan. Assessment of Ecosystem Water Retention and Its Value in the Upper Reaches of Minjiang River Based on InVEST Model[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(03): 577 -585 .
[7] LV Hao, TIAN Hui-wu, SHEN Shao-yi, DUAN Xin-bin, LIU Hao-ping. The Larval Esources of Fishes Spawning  Drifting Eggs in the Lower Reaches of the Minjiang River[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(03): 586 -593 .
[8] ZHANG Ya-fei, LIAO He-ping, LI Yi-long, . Delimitation of Urban Growth Boundary Based on Anti-planning and FLUS Model:A Case Study of Yubei District, Chongqing, China[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(04): 757 -767 .
[9] LIANG Ming-qiang, LI Jun-yun, ZHOU Jing-li, ZHANG Jian, CHEN Chao-jun. Characteristics of Environmental Change and Studying on the Influencing Factors in Furong Cave, Chongqing[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(04): 962 -970 .
[10] HU Nai-juan, CHEN Qian, ZHU Li-qun. Life Cycle Environmental Impact Assessment on Rice Winter Wheat Rotation System in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River:A Case Study of Nanjing, Jiangsu Province[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(05): 1111 -1120 .