RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN >> 2026, Vol. 35 >> Issue (1): 188-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202601015

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Water Quality Differences and Their Impacts between Poyang Lake and Its Isolated Lakes

YUAN Li-ge1, LI Bing2,3, YANG Gui-shan1,2,3,4, WAN Rong-rong2,3,4, WANG Xiao-long2,3,4, HE Zi-qian5   


  1. (1. School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Hohai University, Nanjing 210008, China; 2. National Key Laboratory of Lake Science and Environment, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 211135, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 211135, China; 4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 5. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China )
  • Online:2026-01-20 Published:2026-01-20

Abstract: Understanding the effects of hydrological connectivity loss on lake water quality is critical for developing targeted restoration strategies. As China’s largest freshwater and a historically river-connected lake, Poyang Lake has experienced progressive fragmentation since the 20th century due to dam and levee construction, isolating its subsidiary lakes (e.g., Zhuhu, Junshan, Kangshan, Xinmiao, and Nanbeigang). However, systematic comparisons of water quality between the main lake and these isolated subsystems remain scarce. To address this gap, we conducted a comprehensive survey analyzing spatiotemporal variations in physicochemical parameters. Key findings revealed: (1) Isolated lakes exhibited greater fluctuations than Poyang Lake, particularly for Chl-a (CV: 79% in Kangshan Lake vs. 73% in Junshan Lake) and nutrients (CODMn, NH3-N, PO4-P, TN, TP). (2) Kangshan Lake (γ = 1.25) and Nanbeigang (γ = 1.14) reached moderate pollution levels, significantly exceeding Poyang Lake in TN (p < 0.05 vs. Junshan/Zhuhu/Xinmiao) and TP (p < 0.05 vs. Zhuhu/Nanbeigang). (3) Anthropogenic pressures (fertilizer use, industrial density) dominated water quality disparities, while hydrological factors (water depth) exerted secondary effects. These results underscored the need for dual interventions: (i) stringent control of watershed pollutant loads and (ii) engineered reconnection to restore natural flow regimes.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!