RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (11): 2763-2777.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202111019

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on the Spatio-temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Economic Efficiency of Generalized Water Use for Crop Production in China′s Major Grain-producing Area

WU Zhao-dan1,2,3, ZHANG Yi1, WU Zhao-lei4, WU Yi-zhuo1, LIANG Xi-yao5   

  1. (1. Business School, Hohai University, Changzhou 213022, China; 2. Jiangsu Provincial Collaborative Innovation 
    Center of World Water Valley and Water Ecological Civilization, Nanjing 211100, China; 
    3. Center of Africa Studies with One Belt One Road, Hohai University, Changzhou 213022, China; 
    4. School of Electric Power, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China; 
    5. College of Innovative Business and Accountancy, Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok Thailand 10210)

  • Online:2021-11-20 Published:2021-12-14

Abstract: Improving the economic efficiency of water use for crop production in China′s major grain-producing areas (MGPA) is greatly significant to promote national food security, water safety, rural revitalization, the Yangtze River protection, as well as the ecological protection and high-quality development of the Yellow River Basin. Regional economic efficiency of generalized water use for crop production (EEGWUC) was represented by the ratio of regional crops output value to the total amount of blue and green water consumption in the crop production. Considering both the five major staple crops like rice and wheat, and 12 non-staple crops such as sugarcane, peanut, cotton, etc., the spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of the EEGWUC was analyzed in the 13 provinces of MGPA in China during 2000-2018. With the improvement and supplement of the influencing factors in existing researches, this study analyzed the influencing factors of EEGWUC in MGPA based on the panel data regression method. The results show that: (1) from 2000 to 2018, annual mean of EEGWUC in any of the 13 provinces in China′s MGPA were in fluctuating upward trend, and the annual average of EEGWUC in MGPA increased from 140 CNY/ million tons to 267 CNY/ million tons. This efficiency in Jilin showed the most obvious fluctuation, while that in Hubei embodied the weakest fluctuation. The inter-provincial difference of EEGWUC in MGPA decreased with fluctuation, and the 13 provinces can be ranked by the EEGWUC annual average from the highest to the lowest as follows: Jiangsu (265 CNY/ million tons), Hunan, Jiangxi; Liaoning; Henan, Sichuan; Jilin, Hubei; Hebei, Anhui, Inner Mongolia, Heilongjiang and Shandong (144 CNY/million tons). (2) The significantly positive factors of EEGWUC in MGPA included fertilizer application per unit sown area, water use in the irrigation per unit area, the ratio of sown area of food crop to the regional sown area, the ratio of effective irrigation area to regional cultivating area, water-saving irrigation index, reservoir capacity per unit sown area, utilization coefficient of irrigation water. Meanwhile, amount of agricultural plastic film used per unit sown area, proportion of fixed asset investment in the GDP of the primary industry, provincial water use structure and educational level of the rural population, impacted the EEGWUC significantly and negatively. Based on this, suggestions were put forward to improve the EEGWUC in China′s MGPA, such as adjusting the mode of agricultural production, strengthening the construction and operation of water conservancy infrastructure, increasing agricultural subsidies and preferential policies for agriculture, allocate water resources scientifically and strengthening education and publicity, and improving the management of government financial expenditure.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] GUO Zheng, , DONG Ping, , LU Yuqi, , , HUANG Qunfang, MA Yinyi. Analysis on the Evolution and Influence Factors of Yangtze River delta container port system[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[2] WU Wenqi, , LUO Xian, , HUANG Wei, LI Yungang, . Research on the Water Resources Carrying Capacity and Its Temporal——Spatial Distribution Characteristics in Yunnan Province, China[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1385 .
[3] WANG Hui, , YAN Junping, , WANG Pengtao, WU Yaqun, . Spatial Pattern of Economic Disparities in the Multiethnic Region of China[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1390 .
[4] YANG Hong, , LI Huilin , LU Lu . Spatial Distribution of AmmoniaOxidizing Microorganism in Surface Water and Sediment in Jialing River (Nanchong Section) and Their Relationship with Environmental Factors[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(08): 1836 .
[5] LI En-kang, LU Yu-qi, WANG Yi, HUANG Qun-fang, GUO Zheng. Impact of Urbanization on Institutional Transformation:Analysis of Impulse Response Function Based on 13 Cities In Jiangsu Province[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(09): 1919 -1927 .
[6] WEI Guo-en, ZHU Xiang, HE Qing-yu. Study on the Evolution Characteristics and Countermeasures of Spatial Evolvement Relation in Urbanagglomeration around Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(09): 1958 -1967 .
[7] CHUO Mingying, MA Jun, LIU Defu, YANG Zhengjian . Numerical Simulation of the Influence of Curtain Weirs on Characteristics of Water Temperature in Xiangxi Bay[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(09): 2101 -2113 .
[8] . Dynamic Evolution of Land Use Landscape Patterns in Mountainous Cities from 2000 to 2015:A Case Study of Yubei District in Chongqing[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, , (): 0 .
[9] . [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, , (): 0 .
[10] TIAN Peng, LI Jia-lin, , SHI Xiao-li, WANG Li-jia, LIU Rui-qing. Spatial and Temporal Changes of Land Use Pattern and Ecological Risk Assessment in Zhejiang Province[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(12): 2697 -2706 .