RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (10): 2109-2123.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202310010

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of Well-Being of Ecosystem Services in Xin’an River Basin and the Realization Path:An Empirical Analysis Based on 798 Questionnaires of Rural Residents

FU Lin-rong1,2, REN Yi-sheng3,4, LU Lin2, LI Tian-yu1    

  1. (1. School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China; 2. School of Geography and Tourism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241002, China;3. School of Economics and Management, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241002, China;4. Institute of Rural Revitalization, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241002, China)
  • Online:2023-10-20 Published:2023-10-26

Abstract: Rural residents benefit from river basin ecosystems as a result of the interaction of natural, social, and economic systems. Based on 798 questionnaires of rural residents in the Xin’an River Basin, a logical framework of the well-being effects of watershed ecosystem services and the paths to achieve was constructed by combining the theory of planned behavior. This study analyzed the needs and demand satisfaction status of watershed residents in terms of the importance of watershed ecosystem services and residents’ well-being satisfaction, and explored the specific process of natural ecosystem flow to well-being by using structural equation modeling. The results showed that: (1) rural residents in the river basin are mainly pure farmers, and their livelihood patterns hada relatively high demand for provisioning and regulating services, so the importance perception is high as well.The overall change of ecosystem services in the watershed demonstrated a slightly increasing trend; (2) Residents’ satisfaction with health well-being is high, while satisfaction with freedom and choice of well-being is low. The satisfaction status of higher-order well-being needs was poor and was difficult to achieve; (3) Well-being was the result of the residents’ initiative as the main body of action to promote the formation of a positive interaction between the natural ecological system and the social and economic system. Two paths were concluded. The first path was:the importance of ecosystem services → ecological awareness → change in ecosystem services → well-being of residents; The second one: the importance of ecosystem services → ecological awareness → willingness to participate → eco-environmental behavior → change in ecosystem services → well-being of residents. Finally, this paperput forward suggestions on promoting the realization of well-being in terms of the improvement of residents’ ecological cognition, the transformation and upgrading of sustainable livelihoods, the development of incentives and penalties, and the exercise of the subjective initiative of action subjects.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] GUO Zheng, , DONG Ping, , LU Yuqi, , , HUANG Qunfang, MA Yinyi. Analysis on the Evolution and Influence Factors of Yangtze River delta container port system[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[2] WU Wenqi, , LUO Xian, , HUANG Wei, LI Yungang, . Research on the Water Resources Carrying Capacity and Its Temporal——Spatial Distribution Characteristics in Yunnan Province, China[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1385 .
[3] LI En-kang, LU Yu-qi, WANG Yi, HUANG Qun-fang, GUO Zheng. Impact of Urbanization on Institutional Transformation:Analysis of Impulse Response Function Based on 13 Cities In Jiangsu Province[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(09): 1919 -1927 .
[4] WANG Lei, LI Cheng-li.  

The Effect of Multi-Center Structure of Urban Agglomerations in Central China [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(10): 2231 -2240 .

[5] . [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, , (): 0 .
[6] TONG Xiao-rong, YANG Qing-yuan, BI Guo-hua, . Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Land Use Changes in Chongqing  during 2000-2015[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(11): 2481 -2495 .
[7] KANG Ting-ting, XU Huan, ZHANG Chun-hua, HU Zhao-ling. Estimation and analysis on the Temporal-spatial Variations of Cropland Maximum Light Use Efficiency at Regional Scale[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(12): 2766 -2774 .
[8] . Temporal and spatial variation of suspended sediment at the controlling station of Yangtze River Estuary[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, , (): 0 .
[9] GUO Qing-bin, LUO Kang, LI Jue-ming, LIU Cheng-liang. Spatial Correlation Analysis of the Resources Aggregating Ability in Wuhan Metropolitan Area[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(02): 306 -312 .
[10] DONG Peng-yu, ZHAO Hua-fu, . Study on Trade-off and Synergy Relationship of Cultivated Land Multifunction: A Case of Qingpu District, Shanghai[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(02): 368 -375 .