RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN >> 2024, Vol. 33 >> Issue (7): 1462-1473.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202407008

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on Carbon Footprint Under Different Cropping Patterns of Paddy Fields in the Lower Reaches of the Yangtze Rive

YAN Yan1, JI Guo-jun2,3, HU Nai-juan3, CHEN Liu-gen3, ZHENG Jian-chu3, HU Feng2   

  1. (1. College of Humanities and Social Development, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095,China;2. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095,China;3. Key Laboratory of Agricultural Environment of the Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China/Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China)
  • Online:2024-07-20 Published:2024-07-18

Abstract: Reducing carbon emissions while ensuring grain security is currently an urgent problem that needs to be solved for optimizing agricultural planting structure. This study analyzed the influence of different cropping patterns on greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprint of paddy fields in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Four treatments were considered including one single-cropping pattern (i.e., winter fallow-rice) and three double-cropping patterns (i.e., Chinese milk vetch-rice, winter rapeseed-rice and winter wheat-rice). Methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions were simultaneously measured by static chamber and gas chromatography methods for two consecutive years. The life cycle assessment method was used to estimate the direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions caused by field production process and agricultural inputs. The carbon footprint was then accordingly calculated. The results showed that: (1) Double-cropping patterns significantly increased the annual CH4 and N2O emissions by 17.5%~64.5% and 60.7%~139.8%, and the annual soil organic carbon sequestrations by 17.3%~37.2%, respectively. (2) The soil organic carbon sequestrations under different cropping patters could offset 26.6%~35.6% of greenhouse gas emissions. When soil organic carbon sequestrations were taken into account, the average annual net carbon footprint per unit area for winter wheat-rice, winter rapeseed-rice, and Chinese milk vetch-rice was 13.79, 11.83, and 9.07 t CO2-eq·hm-2, respectively, which was 80.6%, 55.0%, and 18.8% greater than that for winter fallow-rice (7.63 t CO2-eq·hm-2). (3) Soil CH4 emissions were the most important contributor to the carbon footprint of paddy fields (61.8%~67.4%), followed by nitrogen fertilizer application (18.3%~23.9%), N2O emissions (3.3%~5.2%) and diesel combustion (2.2%~2.8%). (4) Double-cropping patterns could increase the annual grain yields and economic outputs compared with those of single-cropping pattern, while planting grain and oil crops in non-rice season significantly improved the annual net incomes. However, no significant differences in the carbon footprint per grain yield and the carbon footprint per economic output were observed between the four cropping patterns. Therefore, winter fallow-rice was a relatively low carbon cropping pattern for paddy fields in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Considering the carbon emission, grain security and economic output, winter wheat-rice and winter rapeseed-rice were superior to winter fallow-rice. Development of effective strategies for CH4 and nitrogen fertilizer reduction should be considered as a priority for reducing the carbon footprint of paddy fields.


No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] ZHANG Xin, CHEN Zhigang . Economic Growth Incentive, Local Officials’ Characteristics and Urban Industrial Pollution:#br# A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1314 .
[2] LUO Nengsheng, WANG Yuze, PENG Yu, LI Jianming. EcoEfficiency of Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Yangtze River Basin: Spatial Analysis and Synergetic Promotion Mechanism[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[3] ZHANG Dapeng, CAO Weidong, , YAO Zhaozhao, YUE Yang, REN Yawen. Study on the Distribution Characteristics and Evolution of Logistics Enterprises in Shanghai Metropolitan Area[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1365 .
[4] SHE Ying, , LIU Yaobing. Historical Context and Enlightenment of Domestic and Foreign Green Development Regime[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1370 .
[5] YAO Lin, SHEN Jing, WEN Xinlong, GAO Chao. Impact of Various Parameterization Schemes in WRF Model on Wind Simulation at the mountain Wind Power Station of Jiangxi Province[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1380 .
[6] WU Wenqi, , LUO Xian, , HUANG Wei, LI Yungang, . Research on the Water Resources Carrying Capacity and Its Temporal——Spatial Distribution Characteristics in Yunnan Province, China[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1385 .
[7] WANG Hui, , YAN Junping, , WANG Pengtao, WU Yaqun, . Spatial Pattern of Economic Disparities in the Multiethnic Region of China[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1390 .
[8] XIONG Meihua, SHAO Ke, ZHAO Xiujiang, ZHU Bin, SHI Fang. Population Genetic Structure of Coreius guichenoti in the Upstream and Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1395 .
[9] YANG Hanwei, MA Yue, SHI Jun. Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Summertime High Temperature in Yangtze River Delta under the Background of Global Warming[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1400 .
[10] KONG Feng, , SUN Shao, WANG Yifei, LU Lili, . Temporal and Spatial Variation Pattern of Waterlogging Events in Eastern China in Recent 56 Years[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(07): 1405 .