长江流域资源与环境 >> 2013, Vol. 22 >> Issue (08): 1072-.

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

巢湖流域丰乐河洪水事件营养盐输出动态研究

储 茵 |潮洪武 |马友华 |郑珊珊 |潘应生   

  1. (1安徽农业大学资源与环境学院, 安徽 合肥 230036|2合肥市水文局|安徽 合肥 230022)
  • 出版日期:2013-08-20

DYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF NUTRIENT EXPORT DURING FLOOD EVENTS FROM FENGLE RIVER CATCHMENT OF CHAO LAKE BASIN,CHINA

CHU Yin1,CHAO Hongwu2,MA Youhua1,ZHENG Shanshan1,PAN Yingsheng2   

  1. (1.School of Resources and Environment,Anhui Agricultural University,Hefei 230036|China;2.Bureau of Hydrology of Hefei City,Hefei 230022|China
  • Online:2013-08-20

摘要:

洪水期是非点源污染输出的关键时期。通过对巢湖典型农业型流域丰乐河桃溪断面两次暴雨洪水过程(发生于2010年6月初的Event06和8月底的Event08)进行集中取样监测,结合该断面流量数据,分析了洪水过程中氮和磷营养盐不同指标(包括总氮、铵氮、硝态氮、总磷和可溶磷)浓度和瞬时负荷的动态变化规律。结果表明:Event06氮磷各指标浓度最小值、最大值及平均值均比Event08大,这与6月初农作物大量施肥,氮磷来源丰富有很大关系。丰乐河洪水事件氮输出的形式以可溶性无机氮(铵氮和硝态氮)为主,而磷则以颗粒态为主,但在涨水段的初、中期颗粒态氮和颗粒态磷所占比例比其它时段高。洪水过程中主要氮、磷指标浓度和瞬时负荷随流量增大而总体呈上升趋势(除了硝态氮),在流量峰值前达到最大值,然后呈总体下降趋势。总磷、总氮浓度与流量呈比较典型的顺时针圈形结构,表明暴雨洪水较强烈的冲刷输送作用。虽然进一步的负荷累积分析并没有显示显著的初期冲刷效应,但洪水期,特别是涨水段营养盐输出的重要性已较明显。丰乐河流域面积较大、地势较平坦,以农业活动为主,水体污染的非点源来源与农业活动有关,具体的洪水过程对营养盐的输出动态也有一定影响

Abstract:

Nonpoint source pollutants are mainly transported during flood events.The Fengle River,one of the main tributaries of the Chao Lake in the middleeast part of China,was chosen to study nonpoint source nutrient export characteristics in a largesized agricultural catchment.Two summer events (Event06,in the beginning of June and Event08,at the end of August,2010) were intensively sampled at Taoxi section of the river and analyzed for Total Nitrogen (TN),Ammonia,Nitrate,Total Phosphorus (TP) and Dissolved Phosphorus.Hourly discharge and rainfall data were also available at the same section.The drainage area of this section is 1500 km2 with elevatio between 6463m and main stream length is about 50km.Land use includes agriculture (about 45%),forest (39%),town and roads (10%) and water area (ponds and river,6%).No large cities or industry factories are located in this drainage catchment.Both events demonstrated single peak hydrograph.But Event06,which was caused by one storm,was relatively more intensive than Event08 which was caused by 3 separated storms.The base,peak and average discharge were 226,2163 and 1313m3/s for Event06 and 654,1564 and 1094m3/s for Event08,respectively.The minimum,maximum and average concentration values of each indicator of Event06 were much higher than those of Event08,which was mainly due to the fertilization at the end of May or in beginning of June just before the transplanting of rice seedling.Another reason might be that Event06 was more intensive and thus demonstrated stronger erosion and transportation capacity than Event08.The average concentrations of TN and TP were 405 and 011 mg/L for Event06 and 162 and 008 mg/L for Event08,respectively.Nitrogen was mainly exported in dissolved inorganic forms,ie.ammonium and nitrate,which were at similar level.Particulate phosphorus export was relatively more important than dissolved form.The transportation of particulate forms of both nitrogen and phosphorus was more important in the beginning and middle phase of rising limb than the rest flood phases.During the flood events,both concentrations and instantaneous loads of most of the determinants (with an exception of nitrate in one of the events) fluctuated but generally increased in the rising limb,attained the peak values before peak discharge and then declined.The relationships between concentrations of TN and TP and discharge over both events resulted in typical clockwise hysteresis,demonstrating the important washing off and transport capacity of flood water flow in the rising phase.Although obvious ‘first flush’ effect was not obtained through the cumulative mass and cumulative discharge analysis based on the two monitored events mainly due to the relatively large catchment area and gentle topography in most part of the catchment,the importance of nutrient export during flood event had been emphasized.The detailed pollutant accumulation processes in the river reaches and/or the area near the river reach and their transportation should be influenced by successive flood events,which need further study through detailed field and modeling work

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 向 波,纪昌明,蓝霄峰,罗庆松. 地下水非稳定流问题的有限分析五点格式[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 721 .
[3] 刘传江,朱劲松. 三峡库区土地资源承载力现状与可持续发展对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 522 .
[4] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[5] 肖思思, 黄贤金, 彭补拙, 濮励杰, 陈 逸. 经济发达县域耕地土壤重金属污染评价及其影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 674 .
[6] 陈 逸,黄贤金,彭补拙,濮励杰,张 健 . 经济发达区不同土地利用方式下土壤中镉的含量特征——以江苏省昆山市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 391 .
[7] 魏显虎|杜耘,蔡述明,薛怀平,刘韬,. 清江流域1995~2000年土壤侵蚀时空变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 120 -124 .
[8] 姚书春,薛 滨,夏威岚. 洪湖历史时期人类活动的湖泊沉积环境响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 475 -480 .
[9] 林建伟,王里奥, 赵建夫,张 军,袁 辉. 三峡库区生活垃圾的重金属污染程度评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 104 -108 .
[10] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .