长江流域资源与环境 >> 2013, Vol. 22 >> Issue (8): 1172-.

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于陆路交通网络的跨界旅游区可达性测度及空间格局优化研究

冯立新|杨效忠   

  1. (安徽师范大学国土资源与旅游学院|安徽 芜湖 |241003)
  • 出版日期:2013-09-20

MEASURING AND OPTIMIZING SPATIAL STRUCTURE OF ACCESSIBILITY OF 
[JP3]CROSSBORDER TOURISM REGION BASED ON LAND TRANSPORTATION NETWORK

FENG Lixin| YANG Xiaozhong   

  1. (College of Territorial Resources and Tourism| Anhui Normal University| Wuhu 241003| China)
  • Online:2013-09-20

摘要:

跨界旅游区是中国重要的潜在旅游目的地,而可达性大小是制约其旅游一体化发展的主要因素之一。通过构建景区区内可达性、景区区外可达性两类指标,运用 GIS软件定量分析大别山跨界旅游区景区可达性,生成空间格局示意图,发现:(1)国道、省道、县道构成的普适性交通网络的完善程度对景区区内可达性起着决定性的影响作用,而高速公路、普通铁路、高速铁路可以有效提高景区区内可达性;(2)普适性交通网络对景区区外可达性的影响力最弱,高速公路在改善景区区外可达性方面起到关键性作用,普通铁路的影响力不及高速公路,高速铁路仅对停靠站附近的景区有所影响。最后构建了景区、交通、旅游集散地耦合发展模式

Abstract:

Crossborder tourism area is important potential tourism destination in China, while the size of accessibility is one of the main restrictive factors of integrated development of tourism. Accessibility is an efficient and comprehensive index for transport network evaluation. The traffic impact on accessibility has been the hotspot research in the transportation geography. Abroad researchers take more work on accessibility theory which is relatively mature, and empirical research is also more indepth. From the perspective of selected cases, domestic researchers mostly concentrate in accessible areas, less involve crossborder tourism areas. Thus,we focus on the accessibility of crossborder tourism area. In this study, two kinds of indexes were built, including scenic area intraregional accessibility and scenic area extraregional accessibility. Taking Dabie Mountain crossborder tourism scenic area for example, Dabie Mountain crossborder tourism scenic area was analyzed and the spatial pattern diagram was generated by using GIS software quantitative analysis method. The results show that, the effect of single transportation on regional intraregional accessibility was limited, but  the effect of entrance and exit of the expressway and railway station nearby tourism scenic region was significant. Due to the characteristics of sealing and the limited quantity of entrance and exit of the expressway and railway station, the expressway, common railway, highspeed railway had not become universality transportation. Degree perfection of universality transport network played a decisive influence on the scenic area intraregional accessibility, which included the national, provincial and county roads. Then the expressway, common railway, highspeed railway could effectively improve the intraregional accessibility. Universality transport network had the weakest influence on the scenic extraregional accessibility. The expressway played a key role in improving scenic area extraregional accessibility. And the common railway had less influence,compared with expressway. The expressway only had an impact on the scenic spots near the railway station. Market mechanism and government guidance need to be carried out simultaneously to succeed in developing the scenic area, transportation and tourism center. The government agency should set up crossborder coordination, draw up crossborder area, transportation, distribution center coupling development plan, in order to weaken the geographic boundaries and the rigid constraints of traditional administrative boundaries. Especially in the early coupling,crossborder cooperating agency should provide more support from financial, policy and other aspects, harmonize both sides of the border relevant departments, such as the transport sector, tourism management department, department of transportation and other departments. We also need to create favorable external hardware environment for coupling functions of the scenic area, transportation, tourism centers. In addition, the coupling body of the scenic area, transportation, tourism centers should take the road of marketoriented operation, selfmanagement, selffinancing, in order to enhance the ability of adapting to market competition. Finally, this paper constructed the area, transport, tourism center hub coupling development mode, in the hope of understanding the accessibility scenic area spatial pattern in crossborder tourism, revealing its inherent laws, and trying to provide theoretical inspiration and practical guidance for building tourism centers, transportation infrastructure and the development of crossborder.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 向 波,纪昌明,蓝霄峰,罗庆松. 地下水非稳定流问题的有限分析五点格式[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 721 .
[3] 刘传江,朱劲松. 三峡库区土地资源承载力现状与可持续发展对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 522 .
[4] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[5] 肖思思, 黄贤金, 彭补拙, 濮励杰, 陈 逸. 经济发达县域耕地土壤重金属污染评价及其影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 674 .
[6] 陈 逸,黄贤金,彭补拙,濮励杰,张 健 . 经济发达区不同土地利用方式下土壤中镉的含量特征——以江苏省昆山市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 391 .
[7] 魏显虎|杜耘,蔡述明,薛怀平,刘韬,. 清江流域1995~2000年土壤侵蚀时空变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 120 -124 .
[8] 姚书春,薛 滨,夏威岚. 洪湖历史时期人类活动的湖泊沉积环境响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 475 -480 .
[9] 林建伟,王里奥, 赵建夫,张 军,袁 辉. 三峡库区生活垃圾的重金属污染程度评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 104 -108 .
[10] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .