长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (01): 26-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201401004

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

武汉城市圈城乡文化整合的空间测度与机理研究

朱媛媛| 曾菊新| 韩勇   

  1. (华中师范大学城市与环境科学学院|湖北 武汉 430079)
  • 出版日期:2014-01-20

STUDY ON THE URBANRURAL CULTURAL INTEGRATIONS SPACE MEASUREMENT AND MECHANISM OF WUHAN CITY CIRCLE

ZHU Yuanyuan| ZENG Juxin| HAN Yong   

  1. (College of Urban and Environment Science|CentralChina Normal University|Wuhan 430079|China)
  • Online:2014-01-20

摘要:

文化整合是文化地理学研究的重要领域之一,城乡文化整合已经成为学界与政界的关注焦点。围绕武汉城市圈城乡文化整合的空间测度,遵循科学性、普适性和可操作性的原则从城乡文化资源整合、城乡文化要素整合、城乡文化产业整合与城乡文化发展整合4个方面构建评价指标体系,运用因子分析法对武汉城市圈48个县域单元的城乡文化整合度进行测算,据之将其分为4个等级。阐述了武汉城市圈城乡文化整合空间分异整体上呈以武汉市为圆心,随距离的递增向周边地区递减的网络化格局,其中沿“京-广”铁路与“长江经济带”分布的县级单元的城乡文化整合度强于同等距离的其他区域。论证了城乡文化资源差异是城乡文化空间结构分异的根本,城乡文化系统改善是城乡文化整合度提升的关键,城乡文化产业协调是促进城乡文化整合的基础,城乡文化科学发展是城乡文化整合的最终目标

Abstract:

Cultural integration is one of the most important fields in Cultural Geography. Especially, urbanrural cultural integration has become a highlight in academic and political circles. Urbanrural cultural integration refers to two paralleled cultural systems, the factors of which interact and merger each other to form an organic and harmonious culture system. Using a case study of Wuhan City Circle, this paper aims to construct Measure Index System (MIS), around spatial measure of integration for urbanrural cultural integration, following scientific, general and practical principles. The MIS is established from following levels of four functional indexes—urbanrural integration in cultural resources index, cultural factors index, cultural industries index and cultural development index, twelve goal decomposition indexes and twenty-four detailed indicators. By using the method of factor analysis, we extract three principal divisors—economic divisor, potential divisor and security divisor, and then compute the integration degree for the fortyeight counties. According to the computation, four strength regions are divided, which include the fullyintegrated region, wellintegrated region, weakintegrated region and weakerintegrated region. We argue that the spatial disparity of urbanrural cultural integration in Wuhan City Circle, by and large, presents the structure that Wuhan city is the center of cultural integration and as the distance increasing, the intensity decreases, especially along with “JingGuang” railway and the Yangtze river economic zone, the counties in which shows a stronger integration than other regions with the same distance. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the difference of urban-rural cultural resources is the fundamental factor causing the spatial structure disparity. The paper demonstrates that 1) the essence of urbanrural cultural structure disparity is resulted by the cultural resource difference between urban and rural. Culture resources can bring about the direct and indirect economic benefits, including cultural heritage, cultural groups, culture investment, and culture construction and so on. In the process of integration, narrowing the gap between urban and rural cultural resources will enhance the level of cultural integration through exploring the rural culture resources, organizing effectively cultural activity and improving the comprehensive quality of rural people; 2) to improve the cultural system is the key point for the integration. Urbanrural cultural system is constituted by material, spiritual, behavioral and institutional factors which form the cultural structure according to certain combination; 3) the foundation of integration is to harmonize urbanrural cultural industries. Cultural industries are part of cultural enterprises, which fully reflect the economic attribute of culture. Thus the harmony of cultural industries is the order and powerful way for the integration; 4) the ultragoal of integration is the scientific development of urbanrural culture. Urbanrural cultural integration is a process of preferential orientation, in which rural traditional culture will be critically inherited, and urban culture selectively absorbed. It is a twoway evolution where excellent culture will be taken in, while backward one abandoned. It must be a process, in which only based on the reorganization of disparity and complementarity between urban and rural area, the interaction between them will go on the track of being order, scientific and gradually improved

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 寇刘秀, 包存宽, 蒋大和. 生态足迹在城市规划环境评价中的应用——以苏州市域城镇体系规划为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 119 .
[2] 杨 山. 南京城镇空间形态的度量和分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 7 -11 .
[3] 张维昊,宋立荣,徐小清,刘永定,张锡辉. 天然水体中微囊藻毒素归宿的初步研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 84 -88 .
[4] 陈明曦,陈芳清,刘德富 . 应用景观生态学原理构建城市河道生态护岸[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 97 -101 .
[5] 李干蓉 刘丛强 陈 椽 汪福顺 王宝利 李军 灌瑾. 丰水期乌江上游干流水库—河流体系硫同位素组成[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 350 .
[6] 黄锡生 王 江. 中国国际河流水资源利用立法略论[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(5): 416 .
[7] 覃 婕 周志翔 滕明君 王燕燕 史梅容. 武汉市九峰城市森林保护区景观敏感度评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(5): 453 .
[8] 张笑楠, 王克林, 张明阳, 张伟, 凡非得. 人类活动影响下喀斯特区域景观格局梯度分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1187 .
[9] 郭劲松| 贺 阳| 付 川| 方 芳| 李 哲| 杨 艳. 三峡库区腹心地带消落区土壤氮磷含量调查[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(03): 311 .
[10] 张怡然, 邱道持, 李艳. 浅析三峡库区农村集体建设用地集约利用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(z1): 40 .