长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (06): 827-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201406012

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

土地整治区典型林地土壤贮水量预测方法比较

李谦,廖凯华,杨桂山,朱青,郑锦森   

  1. (1中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所,湖泊与环境国家重点实验室,江苏 南京 210008;
    2中国科学院大学,北京 100049;3南京市国土资源局,江苏 南京 210005)
  • 出版日期:2014-06-20

COMPARISON OF PREDICTION METHOD OF TYPICAL #br# [JP3]WOODLAND SOIL WATER STORAGE IN LAND CONSOLIDATION DISTRICT

LI Qian1,2,3,LIAO Kaihua1,YANG Guishan1,ZHU Qing1,ZHENG Jinsen1   

  1. (1 Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology,State Key Laboratory of Lake Science 
    and Environment,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Nanjing 210008,China; 
    2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China; 
    3 The Bureau of Land Resource Nanjing,Nanjing 210005,China)
  • Online:2014-06-20

摘要:

在长期田间试验基础上,分别利用数值模拟方法(Numerical Simulation,NS)和人工神经网络(Artificial Neural Network,ANN)模型构建江南平原土地整治区典型林地的土壤水分运动模型,并对土壤贮水量进行预测。[JP2]NS模型校正结果表明,该模型虽能较好地预测林地土壤含水量动态变化,但是NS模型对训练期和验证期0~60 cm[JP]土层贮水量预测的均方根误差(Root Mean Square Error,RMSE)分别为1109和829 mm,而ANN预测的RMSE分别为417和408 mm,说明ANN的预测效果好于NS模型。最后,敏感性分析结果表明ANN预测精度对输入参数的敏感程度由高到低依次为:前期土壤贮水量>降水量>最高气温>最低气温

Abstract:

Forest hydrological research plays a critical role in alternative landuse practices (eg, restoring farmlands to forests) and  management Mathematical simulation models have often been applied to hydrological processes in forest soils Based on longterm field experimental data, in this study, numerical simulation (NS) method was adopted to construct soil water movement model in typical woodland in land consolidation district of Jiangnan plain, and to predict soil water storage A total of 100 days of observed soil moisture data at four depths (400 observations) were adopted to calibrate the Richards equation by using the inverse option in HYDRUS1D The calibration was for the assessment of the Richards equation to simulate soil moisture content in the experimental site The result of NS model showed that the coefficient of determination (R2) between simulated and observed value of soil moisture in 10, 20, 40 and 60 cm depth was 0863,0870,0865 and 0665, respectively, indicating that soil moisture dynamics in woodland can be effectively predicted by this model It is noteworthy that the 60cm depth was found to have the lower accuracy than the other three depths This may be attributed to the “free drainage” bottom boundary condition at this depth, which often leads to the overestimation of the simulated drainage during the relatively wet periods Therefore, the simulated soil moisture contents at the lower depth (ie, 60 cm) tended to be systematically underestimated [JP2]In addition to NS, the artificial neural network (ANN) [JP]was also applied in this study Four independent variables including precipitation, daily maximum temperature, daily minimum temperature, and antecedent soil water storage were used to construct ANN model to predict the soil water storage as well When predicting the soil water storage of 0-60 cm layer, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for training period and validation period in NS model was 1109 and 829 mm, respectively, while that in ANN model was 417 and 408 mm, respectively, indicating that the prediction result of ANN model was better than NS model However, ANN model is not capable of estimating soil moisture variations for a long time Therefore, using a ensemble method, which has the ability to take both physical and statistical modeling and obtain better prediction results, can be an interesting avenue for future research At last, result of sensitivity analysis showed that the predicting precision of ANN model was most sensitive to antecedent soil water storage, followed by precipitation, daily maximum temperature, and daily minimum temperature

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 向悟生, 李先琨, 何成新, 吕仕洪, 陆树华. 石漠化山地复合生态系统评价——以广西平果县龙何屯生态重建示范区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 826 .
[2] 胡海胜,. 山地景区生态足迹分析——以庐山为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 814 .
[3] 张彦春, 王孟钧, 戴若林. 三峡库区水环境安全分析与战略对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 801 .
[4] 万金保, 李媛媛. 湖泊水质模型研究进展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 805 .
[5] 吴丰林,周德民,胡金明. 基于景观格局演变的城市湿地景观生态规划途径[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 368 .
[6] 余辉, 燕姝雯, 徐??20. 太湖出入湖河流水质多元统计分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 696 .
[7] 刘 钢 | 王慧敏 | 仇 蕾. 湖域工业初始排污权合作配置体系构建——以太湖流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(10): 1223 .
[8] 宋 策 | 谭奇林. 水电工程干扰下饮用水水源地的水质风险评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(01): 59 .
[9] 周彦辰 |胡铁松 |张楠楠 |靳 顶. 美国内陆核电取水量与水资源保障条件浅析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(01): 75 .
[10] 谷家川 |查良松. 皖江城市带农田生态系统碳排放动态研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(01): 81 .