长江流域资源与环境 >> 2015, Vol. 24 >> Issue (03): 469-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201503017

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

三种综合气象干旱指数在洞庭湖流域的适用性分析

薛联青,张竞楠,何新林,汤骅,杨广   

  1. (1. 河海大学水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098;2. 石河子大学水利建筑工程学院, 新疆 石河子 832003;3.河海大学文天学院,安徽 马鞍山 243000
  • 出版日期:2015-03-20

APPLICABILITY OF THREE COMPREHENSIVE METEOROLOGICAL DROUGHT INDEXES IN DONGTING WATERSHED

XUE Lianqing1,2,3, ZHANG Jingnan1,  HE Xinlin2,TANG Hua2,YANG Guang2   

  1. (1. State Key Laboratory of HydrologyWater Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098,China;2.College of Water Conservancy & Architectural Engineering,Shihezi University,Xinjiang 832003,China;3.Hohai University Wentian College, Anhui 243000, China)
  • Online:2015-03-20

摘要:

结合洞庭湖流域水文气象特点,从不合理跳跃点、统计特征、区域干旱以及空间分布等方面综合分析了3种气象干旱指数在该流域的适用性及可靠性。评价结果表明:(1)NCC2CI与CInew指数均可较好解决传统CI指数评估中出现的不合理震荡、旱情加剧等不足,且该指数对长历时干旱表现较为敏感,对短历时干旱存在漏测的可能性;(2)对具有较大烈度特征的干旱事件,NCC2CI指数虽然能较好地监测出等级较高的干旱强度,但对极端干旱强度的特征表征有所不足;(3)干旱NCC2CI指数较好地延续了传统CI指数的统计特性以及空间分布特性,反映出的某时段较大降水对日后的影响时段为20~40 d,指数表征更加符合干旱发生的过程。而CInew指数反映的影响时段为45~70 d,且在空间分布上变化较大,应用可靠性相对较差。综合比较分析表明,NCC2CI指数在洞庭湖流域更具实用性,研究结果对其它类似流域干旱评估具有一定参考作用

Abstract:

The meteorological data from 19 meteorological stations of the Dongting watershed during 1961-2009 were chosen. NCC2CI and CInew are improved form of the traditional CI. NCC2CI is an improved form of the traditional CI in the accumulatedrainfallweight, while the CInew is equivalent to change the SPI30 and M30, which are part of NCC2CI, into SPI90 and M90. The calculation principle of this three drought index is simple synthesis of the standard precipitation index and relative moisture index. This study investigates the applicability of three comprehensive meteorological drought indexes (traditional CI, NCC2CI, CInew) in the Dongting Lake basin, from the unreasonable jump point, the statistical characteristics, the process of sitedrought, the process of regionaldrought and spatial distribution, and so on. Results showed that CInew and NCC2CI could be good solution to the problems such as the unreasonable shocks, the unreasonable increased drought and other shortcomings of the traditional CI. The CInew index is more sensitive to NCC2CI and traditional CI in the monitoring of long duration drought, while there is more possibility to leak the short duration of drought. NCC2CI can better monitor short duration drought, and CInew is better in capturing the starting time of drought than CInew and NCC2CI index. For monitoring the large intensity feature drought, the NCC2CI index can better monitor the higher intensity drought but weakly monitor the extreme drought. NCC2CI index can inherit the distribution and spatial characteristics of the traditional CI index. NCC2CI shows that the influence period of a larger precipitation is 20-40 d, which is more consistent with the development process of drought; while the influence period of a larger precipitation, shown through CInew index, is 45-70 d. In addition, the CInew index has larger difference with the traditional CI index in the spatial distribution, so having a poor reliability 〖JP2〗on application. With a comprehensive comparative analysis, the NCC2CI index is more practical in the Dongting Lake watershed; the research results have a certain reference to other similar watershed on the assessment of drought. In addition,one thing to note is that the meteorological drought index evaluate drought is only based on the evaporation, rainfall and other meteorological information. However, the actual drought is often integrated decision by meteorological, soil moisture, water conservancy facilities and water applications. The comprehensive meteorological drought index can not distinguish the difference between the harm degrees which is caused by the same degree of less precipitation in the farming period and the slack period (i.e. winter). Therefore, the evaluation of drought only based on meteorological index may cause 

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 向 波,纪昌明,蓝霄峰,罗庆松. 地下水非稳定流问题的有限分析五点格式[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 721 .
[3] 刘传江,朱劲松. 三峡库区土地资源承载力现状与可持续发展对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 522 .
[4] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[5] 肖思思, 黄贤金, 彭补拙, 濮励杰, 陈 逸. 经济发达县域耕地土壤重金属污染评价及其影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 674 .
[6] 陈 逸,黄贤金,彭补拙,濮励杰,张 健 . 经济发达区不同土地利用方式下土壤中镉的含量特征——以江苏省昆山市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 391 .
[7] 魏显虎|杜耘,蔡述明,薛怀平,刘韬,. 清江流域1995~2000年土壤侵蚀时空变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 120 -124 .
[8] 姚书春,薛 滨,夏威岚. 洪湖历史时期人类活动的湖泊沉积环境响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 475 -480 .
[9] 林建伟,王里奥, 赵建夫,张 军,袁 辉. 三峡库区生活垃圾的重金属污染程度评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 104 -108 .
[10] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .