长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (01): 106-112.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201601013
余亮亮, 蔡银莺
YU Liang-liang, CAI Yin-ying
摘要: 从农户满意度绩效出发,在理论分析基础上提出相关研究假说,并基于全国率先探索耕地保护基金的成都市的实地调研数据,利用ordered probit模型,实证检验了耕地保护补贴流向对耕地保护经济补偿政策农户满意度的影响。研究结果表明:(1)转出土地的农户比转入土地或未流转土地的农户对耕地保护经济补偿政策有更高的满意度。土地转出行为使农民对补偿政策"非常不满意"、"不满意"和"一般"的概率分别下降0.3%、4.8%和11%,并使农民对补偿政策"满意"和"非常满意"的概率分别上升14.4%和1.7%。(2)土地转入行为则使农民对补偿政策"非常不满意"、"不满意"和"一般"的概率分别上升9.3%、35.4%和0.7%,并使农民对补偿政策"满意"和"非常满意"的概率分别下降42.9%和2.6%。为提高耕地保护经济补偿政策农户满意度绩效,政府应合理分配有限的耕地保护补贴资金,补贴资金应优先向土地转入户倾斜,提高实际上在承担耕地保护责任的土地转入户保护耕地的积极性。
中图分类号:
[1] 刘彦随,乔陆印.中国新型城镇化背景下耕地保护制度与政策创新[J].经济地理,2014,34(4):1-6.[LIU Y S, QIAO L Y. Innovating system and policy of arable land conservation under the new-type urbanization in China[J]. Economic Geography, 2014, 34(4):1-6.] [2] BAYLIS K, PEPLOW S, RAUSSER G, et al. Agri-environmental policies in the EU and United States:a comparison[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(4):753-764. [3] KAPLOWITZ M D, MACHEMER P, PRUETZ R. Planners' experiences in managing growth using transferable development rights (TDR) in the United States[J]. Land Use Policy, 2008, 25(3):378-387. [4] LAUKKANEN M, NAUGES C. Evaluating greening farm policies:A structural model for assessing agri-environmental subsidies[J]. Land Economics, 2014, 90(3):458-481. [5] CLAASSEN R, CATTANEO A, JOHANSSON R. Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs:U.S. experience in theory and practice[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(4):737-752. [6] HODGE I. Agri-environment policy in an era of lower government expenditure:CAP reform and conservation payments[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2013, 56(2):254-270. [7] 余亮亮,蔡银莺.耕地保护经济补偿政策的初期效应评估——东、西部地区的实证及比较[J].中国土地科学,2014,28(12):16-23.[YU L L, CAI Y Y. Assessing the effect of economic compensation for farmland protection policy:an empirical research and comparison of the eastern and western regions of China[J]. China Land Sciences, 2014, 28(12):16-23.] [8] 罗文斌,吴次芳,倪尧,等.基于农户满意度的土地整理项目绩效评价及区域差异研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(8):68-74.[LUO W B, WU C F, NI Y, et al. Research on performance evaluation of land consolation projects and its difference features based on satisfaction of peasant households survey in east, central and western regions in China[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013, 23(8):68-74.] [9] 王良健,罗凤.基于农民满意度的我国惠农政策实施绩效评估——以湖南、湖北、江西、四川、河南省为例[J].农业技术经济,2010(1):56-63.[WANG L J, LUO F. Performance efficiency evaluation of the implementation of agricultural support policies of China based on farmer' satisfactory level——case of 1210 rural household survey in Hunan, Hubei, Jiangxi, Sichuan, and Henan[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2010(1):56-63.] [10] 李效顺,蒋冬梅,卞正富.基于粮食安全视角的中国耕地资源盈亏测算[J].资源科学,2014,36(10):2057-2065.[LI X S, JIANG D M, BIAN Z F. The Surplus and deficit measurement of the cultivated land in China in the view of food security[J]. Resources Science, 2014, 36(10):2057-2065.] [11] 陈会广,吕悦.基于机会成本与Markov链的耕地保护补偿基金测算——以江苏省徐州市为例[J].资源科学,2015,37(1):17-27.[CHEN H G, LV Y. Preservation compensation accounting for farmland based on opportunity costs and Markov chains:a case study on Xuzhou City[J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(1):17-27.] [12] 聂英.中国粮食安全的耕地贡献分析[J].经济学家,2015(1):83-93.[NIE Y. An analysis of the contribution by cultivated land to food security in China[J]. Economist, 2015(1):83-93.] [13] 李长健.农业补贴制度体系化建构逻辑的法理分析——基于利益与利益机制的视角[J].上海财经大学学报,2011,13(2):17-24.[LI C J. Jurisprudential analysis on systematized construction logic of agricultural subsidy system:from the angle of interests and interest mechanism[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 2011, 13(2):17-24.] [14] 张兵,刘丹,李祎雯.匹配经济学视角下农户借贷匹配决定因素的实证分析[J].经济科学,2014(4):93-105. |
No related articles found! |
|