长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (01): 106-112.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201601013

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

补贴流向与耕地保护经济补偿政策农户满意度绩效——以成都市耕地保护基金为例

余亮亮, 蔡银莺   

  1. 华中农业大学公共管理学院, 湖北武汉 430070
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-06 修回日期:2015-07-12 出版日期:2016-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 蔡银莺 E-mail:caiyinying@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:余亮亮(1989~),男,博士研究生,主要研究方向为土地资源经济与管理.E-mail:yuliangliang90@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41371519,71573099)[Foundation Item:National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 4137159 and 71573099]

SUBSIDY FLOW AND ECONOMIC COMPENSATION FOR FARMLAND PROTECTION POLICY BASED ON FARMERS' SATISFACTION:A CASE STUDY OF CULTIVATED LAND PROTECTION FUND IN CHENGDU

YU Liang-liang, CAI Yin-ying   

  1. College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China
  • Received:2015-05-06 Revised:2015-07-12 Online:2016-01-20

摘要: 从农户满意度绩效出发,在理论分析基础上提出相关研究假说,并基于全国率先探索耕地保护基金的成都市的实地调研数据,利用ordered probit模型,实证检验了耕地保护补贴流向对耕地保护经济补偿政策农户满意度的影响。研究结果表明:(1)转出土地的农户比转入土地或未流转土地的农户对耕地保护经济补偿政策有更高的满意度。土地转出行为使农民对补偿政策"非常不满意"、"不满意"和"一般"的概率分别下降0.3%、4.8%和11%,并使农民对补偿政策"满意"和"非常满意"的概率分别上升14.4%和1.7%。(2)土地转入行为则使农民对补偿政策"非常不满意"、"不满意"和"一般"的概率分别上升9.3%、35.4%和0.7%,并使农民对补偿政策"满意"和"非常满意"的概率分别下降42.9%和2.6%。为提高耕地保护经济补偿政策农户满意度绩效,政府应合理分配有限的耕地保护补贴资金,补贴资金应优先向土地转入户倾斜,提高实际上在承担耕地保护责任的土地转入户保护耕地的积极性。

关键词: 补贴流向, 耕地保护经济补偿政策, 农户满意度, 成都耕保基金

Abstract: From the perspective of peasant household' satisfaction and on the basis of theoretical analysis, we put forward a hypothesis. Based on the field survey data of Chengdu which takes the lead in exploring the cultivated land protection fund, we used the ordered probit model to test how the subsidy flow impacts the farmers' satisfaction about the economic compensation for farmland protection policy (ECFP). The results indicate that:(1) The farmers who transferred outward their farmland have higher satisfaction than those who transferred inward their farmland and those who didn't transfer their farmland. If the farmers transfer outward their farmland, the probability of "very dissatisfied", "not satisfied" and "general" that the farmers evaluate about the compensation policy fell by 0.3%, 4.8% and 11%, respectively, and the probability of "satisfaction" and "very satisfied" the farmers evaluate about the compensation policy increased by 14.4% and 1.7%, respectively. (2) If the farmers transfer inward their farmland, the probability of "very dissatisfied", "not satisfied" and "general" that the farmers evaluate about the compensation policy increased by 9.3%, 35.4% and 0.7%, respectively, and the probability of "satisfaction" and "very satisfied" the farmers evaluate about the compensation policy fell by 42.9% and 2.6%, respectively. To improve the farmers' satisfaction performance about the ECFP policy, the government should allocate the limited arable land protection subsidies reasonably. So, subsidies should be given priority to the farmers who transfer inward their farmland and take the responsibility of protecting the arable land actually to improve their motivation about cultivated land protection.

Key words: subsidy flow, economic compensation for farmland protection policy, farmers' satisfaction, cultivated land protection fund in chengdu

中图分类号: 

  • F301F062.1
[1] 刘彦随,乔陆印.中国新型城镇化背景下耕地保护制度与政策创新[J].经济地理,2014,34(4):1-6.[LIU Y S, QIAO L Y. Innovating system and policy of arable land conservation under the new-type urbanization in China[J]. Economic Geography, 2014, 34(4):1-6.]
[2] BAYLIS K, PEPLOW S, RAUSSER G, et al. Agri-environmental policies in the EU and United States:a comparison[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(4):753-764.
[3] KAPLOWITZ M D, MACHEMER P, PRUETZ R. Planners' experiences in managing growth using transferable development rights (TDR) in the United States[J]. Land Use Policy, 2008, 25(3):378-387.
[4] LAUKKANEN M, NAUGES C. Evaluating greening farm policies:A structural model for assessing agri-environmental subsidies[J]. Land Economics, 2014, 90(3):458-481.
[5] CLAASSEN R, CATTANEO A, JOHANSSON R. Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs:U.S. experience in theory and practice[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(4):737-752.
[6] HODGE I. Agri-environment policy in an era of lower government expenditure:CAP reform and conservation payments[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2013, 56(2):254-270.
[7] 余亮亮,蔡银莺.耕地保护经济补偿政策的初期效应评估——东、西部地区的实证及比较[J].中国土地科学,2014,28(12):16-23.[YU L L, CAI Y Y. Assessing the effect of economic compensation for farmland protection policy:an empirical research and comparison of the eastern and western regions of China[J]. China Land Sciences, 2014, 28(12):16-23.]
[8] 罗文斌,吴次芳,倪尧,等.基于农户满意度的土地整理项目绩效评价及区域差异研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(8):68-74.[LUO W B, WU C F, NI Y, et al. Research on performance evaluation of land consolation projects and its difference features based on satisfaction of peasant households survey in east, central and western regions in China[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013, 23(8):68-74.]
[9] 王良健,罗凤.基于农民满意度的我国惠农政策实施绩效评估——以湖南、湖北、江西、四川、河南省为例[J].农业技术经济,2010(1):56-63.[WANG L J, LUO F. Performance efficiency evaluation of the implementation of agricultural support policies of China based on farmer' satisfactory level——case of 1210 rural household survey in Hunan, Hubei, Jiangxi, Sichuan, and Henan[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2010(1):56-63.]
[10] 李效顺,蒋冬梅,卞正富.基于粮食安全视角的中国耕地资源盈亏测算[J].资源科学,2014,36(10):2057-2065.[LI X S, JIANG D M, BIAN Z F. The Surplus and deficit measurement of the cultivated land in China in the view of food security[J]. Resources Science, 2014, 36(10):2057-2065.]
[11] 陈会广,吕悦.基于机会成本与Markov链的耕地保护补偿基金测算——以江苏省徐州市为例[J].资源科学,2015,37(1):17-27.[CHEN H G, LV Y. Preservation compensation accounting for farmland based on opportunity costs and Markov chains:a case study on Xuzhou City[J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(1):17-27.]
[12] 聂英.中国粮食安全的耕地贡献分析[J].经济学家,2015(1):83-93.[NIE Y. An analysis of the contribution by cultivated land to food security in China[J]. Economist, 2015(1):83-93.]
[13] 李长健.农业补贴制度体系化建构逻辑的法理分析——基于利益与利益机制的视角[J].上海财经大学学报,2011,13(2):17-24.[LI C J. Jurisprudential analysis on systematized construction logic of agricultural subsidy system:from the angle of interests and interest mechanism[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 2011, 13(2):17-24.]
[14] 张兵,刘丹,李祎雯.匹配经济学视角下农户借贷匹配决定因素的实证分析[J].经济科学,2014(4):93-105.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘 健,陈 星,彭恩志,周学东. 气候变化对江苏省城市系统用电量变化趋势的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 546 -550 .
[2] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[3] 于国荣,夏自强,叶辉,王桂华,吴 瑶. 大坝下游河段的河流生态径流调控研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 606 .
[4] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[5] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[6] 张 静,汪诚信,白呼群,苏崇鳌,鄂启顺,武桂珍,黄玉英. 三峡库区虫媒和自然疫源性疾病分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 145 -148 .
[7] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[8] 陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[9] 谢 辉,张 雷,姜 巍,程晓凌. 21世纪初华中地区发展的资源环境基础[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 1 -5 .
[10] 翁君山,段 宁| 张 颖. 嘉兴双桥农场大气颗粒物的物理化学特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 129 .