长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (02): 180-189.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201602002

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

上海港对间接腹地经济的作用研究——基于资本路径和物流路径

宋敏, 李剑, 蒋苗苗   

  1. 河海大学商学院, 江苏 南京 211100
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-09 修回日期:2015-08-26 出版日期:2016-02-20
  • 作者简介:宋敏(1975~),女,副教授,博士,主要研究方向为水利经济.E-mail:songmin@hhu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    江苏高校协同创新中心"沿海开发与保护协同创新中心"项目;江苏高校人文社会科学校外研究基地"江苏沿海资源经济研究中心"项目;教育部社科规划基金项目"水利基础设施投资效率的动态空间特征研究"(15YJAF90052)

IMPACT OF SHANGHAI PORT ON ITS INDIRECT HINTERLAND ECONOMY——BASED ON THE PATH OF CAPITAL AND LOGISTICS

SONG Min, LI Jian, JIANG Miao-miao   

  1. Business College, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
  • Received:2015-06-09 Revised:2015-08-26 Online:2016-02-20
  • Supported by:
    Collaborative innovation center Foundation of Education Committee of Jiangsu Province;Humanities and Social Science Research Base Foundation of Education Committee of Jiangsu Province;Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Ministry of Education(15YJAF90052)

摘要: 资本流和物流作为海港对间接腹地经济作用的载体,可以根据其作用路径进行详细分析。通过尝试性地建立面板数据模型,分析海港资本作用枢纽-物流园区、支线港和无水港对间接腹地经济的影响,结合海港对作用枢纽的影响力算法,研究得出上海港通过资本路径对间接腹地生产总值的产出弹性为0.058 6。通过物流路径的系统动力学分析对SD流图进行描述,结合Eviews软件设定各要素的数学方程,选择上海港进行仿真分析,并用历史数据对模型进行检验,误差在可接受的范围之内。进一步对系统进行短期预测,结合预测的结果发现货物运输对间接腹地经济作用的弹性约为0.7。最后分别对上海港主要的吞吐货种进行系统仿真,发现集装箱和石油、天然气及制品的物流运输对间接腹地经济影响最大。

关键词: 海港, 间接腹地经济, 资本路径, 物流路径

Abstract: Capital flow and logistics could be as a carrier of the harbor to indirect hinterland economy effect, in this paper, based on its path for a detailed analysis. This paper tentatively built the panel data model to analysis port hub role of capital, Logistics park the feeder port and anhydrous port had influence on indirect hinterland economy, further combined with influence algorithm of port hub role, and the empirical research revealed that the capital path of the Shanghai port to indirect economic hinterland of gross output elasticity was 0.058 6. Through the logistics system dynamics analysis of the path of SD flow chart described, combined with the mathematical equations set each element of the Eviews software, choosing Shanghai port for the simulation analysis, and using historical data to test the model, the error is within an acceptable range. Further by short-term forecasting system, combined with the result of prediction found the goods transport on indirect hinterland economy effect of elasticity was about 0.7. Finally, respectively, by the Shanghai mainly increased the throughput of system simulation, it found containers and oil, natural gas and products of logistics transportation had the greatest influence on indirect hinterland economy.

Key words: seaport, indirect hinterland economy, capital path, Logistics path

中图分类号: 

  • U116
[1] YOCHUM G R, AGARWAL V B. Economic impact of a port on a regional economy:Note[J]. Growth and Change, 1987, 18(3):74-87.
[2] MOLONEY R, SJOSTROM W. The economic value of the Port of Cork to Ireland in 1999:An input-output study[R]. Cork:National University of Ireland, 2000:8-10.
[3] 许继琴. 港口城市成长的理论与实证探讨[J]. 地域研究与开发, 1997, 16(4):11-14.[XU J Q. On the function of port to the development of port city[J]. Areal Research and Development, 1997, 16(4):11-14.]
[4] 何小明, 王薇. 投入-产出模型在港口对地区经济贡献研究中的应用[J]. 水运管理, 2005, 27(3):16-18.[HE X M, WANG W. Application of input-output model in port economic impact over regional economy[J]. Shipping Management, 2005, 27(3):16-18.]
[5] 宋敏, 姚伟伟, 蒋苗苗. 上海港对直接腹地经济的作用研究——基于海港产业部门构建的投入产出模型[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(1):119-125, 161.[SONG M, YAO W W, JIANG M M. The impact of Shanghai port on its hinterland economy:based on the re-built harbor industrial sector input-output model[J]. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(1):119-125, 161.]
[6] 张光南, 李小瑛, 陈广汉. 中国基础设施的就业、产出和投资效应——基于1998~2006年省际工业企业面板数据研究[J]. 管理世界, 2010(4):5-13, 31.[ZHANG G N, LI X Y, CHEN G H. The effects of public infrastructure on employment, output and investment[J]. Management World, 2010(4):5-13, 31.]
[7] LAKSHMANAN T R. The broader economic consequences of transport infrastructure investments[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2011, 19(1):1-12.
[8] FORRESTER J W. World dynamics[J]. Technology Review, 1971, 73(3):52-68.
[9] NOTTEBOOM T E. Concentration and the formation of multi-port gateway regions in the European container port system:an update[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2010, 18(4):567-583.
[10] 许长新. 港航经济系统理论与数理模型研究[D]. 南京:河海大学博士学位论文, 2001.
[11] 汪传旭, 崔建新. 长江三角洲港口群物流系统动力学分析模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2007. 7(5):77-83.[WANG C X, CUI J X. Dynamics analysis model of port group logistics system in Yangtze River Delta[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2007, 7(5):77-83.]
[12] 王媛. 基于系统动力学的港口物流联盟研究[D]. 广州:广东外语外贸大学硕士学位论文, 2009.[WANG Y. Analysis of port logistics alliance system based on system dynamic[D]. Guangzhou:Master Dissertation of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, 2009.]
[13] 张咪. 港口群物流协同模式研究[D]. 武汉:武汉理工大学博士学位论文, 2011.[ZHANG M. Researcher on logistics-cooperation model of port group[D]. Wuhan:Doctor Dissertation of Wuhan University of Technology, 2011.]
[14] DORIGO M, STÜTZLE T. Ant colony optimization:overview and recent advances[A]//GENDREAU M, POTVIN J Y. Handbook of Metaheuristics. US:Springer, 2010, 146:227-263.
[1] 葛振鸣,周晓,程健敏,陈邦林, 王天厚,王开运,5. 生态型港口综合评价指标体系初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 329-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[2] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[3] 吕东亮. 汉江水质优于长江的原因刍议[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 102 -104 .
[4] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[5] 彭刚华,黄良英. 长江水质评价和预测模型探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 77 -82 .
[6] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[7] 陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[8] 张 雷,吴映梅. 长江干流地区区域发展与国家工业化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 633 -637 .
[9] 魏 伟,周 婕,许 峰. 大城市边缘区土地利用时空格局模拟——以武汉市洪山区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 174 -179 .
[10] 翁君山,段 宁| 张 颖. 嘉兴双桥农场大气颗粒物的物理化学特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 129 .