长江流域资源与环境 >> 2017, Vol. 26 >> Issue (11): 1875-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201711016

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

 
淮河干流大型底栖动物群落结构及水质生物学评价

丁建华1,周立志2,邓道贵1   

  1. (1. 淮北师范大学生命科学学院,安徽 淮北 235000;
    2. 安徽大学资源与环境工程学院生态工程与生物技术安徽省重点实验室,安徽 合肥 230039)
  • 出版日期:2017-11-20

COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF MACROZOOBENTHOS AND BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF WATER QUALITY IN THE MAINSTREAM OF HUAI RIVER

DING Jian-hua1, ZHOU Li-zhi2, DENG Dao-gui1   

  1. (1. School of Life Sciences, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei 235000, China;2. Anhui Key Laboratory of Eco-engineering and Bio-technique, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230039, China)
  • Online:2017-11-20

摘要: 2011年3月、6月、9月和12月对淮河干流大型底栖动物群落进行了取样调查,共采集到大型底栖动物4门41科94种。结果分析表明,淮河干流大型底栖动物群落结构具有一定的时空变化。在时间尺度上,生物密度呈极显著的季节性变化(p = 0.002),其最大值332.5 ind./m2出现在6月,最小值96.6 ind./m2则出现在9月;生物量的变化趋势与生物密度不同步,其最大值155.8 g/m2出现在9月,最小值40.0 g/m2则出现在3月,且季节性差异不显著。冗余分析(RDA)结果表明,溶解氧、盐度、溶解性总固体、水温和底质类型是影响底栖动物群落结构的主要环境因子。Shannon-Wiener多样性指数的季节性变化不显著,Margalef丰富度指数的季节性差异极显著(p = 0.000);自上游至下游,这2个指数的变化规律表现出高度的一致性,其水质评价结果表明淮河干流水质总体上处于中度污染的水平。

Abstract: The macrozoobenthic community structures of the mainstream of Huai Rirer were investigated in March, June, September, and December 2011. A total of 94 macrozoobenthic species from 41 families were recorded. Results showed that there was a significant temporal variation in the macrozoobenthic density(p = 0.002). The maximum mean population density(332.5 ind./m2) occurred in June while the minimum population density(96.6 ind./m2) appeared in September. And yet, the temporal variation trend of biomass was not consistent with that of population densities. The maximum mean biomass(155.8 g/m2) occurred in September while the minimum biomass(40.0 g/m2) appeared in March, and there were no obvious differences among seasons. The redundancy analysis(RDA) results showed that the dissolved oxygen, salinity, total dissolved solids, temperature, and sediment types were the main environmental factors that affect the macrozoobenthic community structure. The temporal variation of Shannon-Wiener diversity index was not significant, but the Margalef richness index was showed significant seasonal variations(p = 0.000). Even so, the variation trends of the two indices were highly consistent from the upstream to the downstream. Overall, the water quality of the mainstream of Huai River was evaluated at the middle-level pollution.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 许晗之,汪院生,常本春,王腊春. 江苏太湖地区调水改善水环境研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 92 -96 .
[2] 徐丽华,岳文泽,徐建华. 城市热场剖面的分形维数计算及其意义研究——以上海中心城区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 384 .
[3] 曾慧卿. 近40年气候变化对江西自然植被净第一性生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 227 .
[4] 冯 平,徐向广,李 海. 基于模糊集合分析的汛期分期方法及其应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 495 .
[5] 徐祖信,叶建锋. 前置库技术在水库水源地面源污染控制中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 792 -795 .
[6] 马荣华,杨桂山. 长江岸线与岛屿演化的空间分形研究——以江苏段为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 541 -545 .
[7] 胡冰川,吴 强,周曙东. 粮食生产的投入产出影响因素分析——基于江苏省粮食生产的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 71 -75 .
[8] 张青青,张世熔,李婷,张林,林晓利,. 基于多元数据的景观格局演变及其影响因素——以流沙河流域宜东段为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 125 -130 .
[9] 周国忠,冯海霞. 浙江省旅游资源地区差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 157 -163 .
[10] 贾 丽, 沈玉芳. 我国生态工业园发展的SWOT分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 711 .