长江流域资源与环境 >> 2018, Vol. 27 >> Issue (09): 2042-2052.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201809015

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

稻农低碳生产行为影响因素与引导策略——基于人际行为改进理论的多组比较分析

沈雪1,2,张露1,2,张俊飚1,2,骆兰翎1,2   

  1. (1.华中农业大学经济管理学院,湖北 武汉 430070;2.湖北农村发展研究中心,湖北 武汉 430070)
  • 出版日期:2018-09-20 发布日期:2018-11-09

Influencing Factors and Guiding Strategies for Lowcarbon Production in Rice Planting: Multiplegroup Analysis Using Interpersonal Behavior Improvement Theory

SHEN Xue, ZHANG Lu, ZHANG Junbiao, LUO Lanling   

  1. (1.College of Economics & Management,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070,China; 2.Hubei Rural Development Research Center, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070,China)
  • Online:2018-09-20 Published:2018-11-09

摘要: 水稻种植是我国农业温室气体的主要排放源,有效引导农户进行水稻低碳化生产对减少农业温室气体排放,实现我国农业绿色可持续发展具有重要意义。基于改进的人际行为理论,建立稻农低碳生产行为影响机制理论框架,继而运用结构方程模型,实证检验了影响稻农低碳生产行为的主要因素及其影响路径。研究表明,低碳行为意愿与能力是激发稻农低碳生产行为的直接动因。行为态度、社会规范、环境情感通过影响低碳行为意愿作用于低碳生产行为。其中,行为态度的影响最大(0555),其次是社会规范(0232),环境情感作用最小(0153)。促进条件在意愿-行为、能力-行为的转化过程中具有显著的调节作用。进一步的多群组分析发现,受教育程度、家庭年收入、种植规模等变量在不同群组间的调节效应存在显著差异。由此表明,鼓励稻农适度扩大水稻种植规模,完善农业绿色生产补贴,加强水稻低碳生产教育与专业技术培训等是提高农户低碳认知与行为意愿,引导稻农从事低碳生产的有效手段

Abstract: The greenhouse gas produced during rice planting is the main source of agricultural greenhouse gases. Effectively promoting the lowcarbon rice production among farmers is an important way to reduce agricultural greenhouse gas emission and to realize the green sustainable development of agriculture in China. In this study, the theoretical framework for the mechanism of lowcarbon production behavior in rice planting was established, which is based on the interpersonal behavior improvement theory. Then, SEM model was employed to analyze the impact of farmers' behavior and its influence. The low carbon willingness and ability  were the direct driving factors to stimulate their lowcarbon production. Behavioral attitudes, social norms and environmental emotions could indirectly affect lowcarbon production behavior by affecting the lowcarbon willingness. Moreover, the coefficient of behavioral attitude is the greatest (0555), indicating the main impact factor, followed by social norms (0232) and environmental emotion (0153). Promotion condition played an importantly moderating role in the transformation process of willingness-behavior and ability-behavior. The further multiplegroup analysis found that there were significant differences in the adjustment effect among different groups divided by education, family income and farm scale. In rice cultivation, encouraging farmers to expand the rice farm scale, improving the subsidies for the agricultural green production and strengthening lowcarbon production education specially in professional technical training are effective methods to enhance the lowcarbon cognition of farmers and behavioral willingness, and to guide farmers to engage in lowcarbon production 。

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张榆霞,刘嘉麒,王立前. 漫湾电站建成后澜沧江下游水质变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 501 -506 .
[2] 刘 健,陈 星,彭恩志,周学东. 气候变化对江苏省城市系统用电量变化趋势的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 546 -550 .
[3] 彭长青,冯金飞,卞新民. 基于遗传算法和GIS的县域水田种植制度空间布局优化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 66 -70 .
[4] 王宜虎,崔 旭,陈 雯. 南京市经济发展与环境污染关系的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 142 -146 .
[5] 王晓青,李哲,吕平毓,郭劲松. 三峡库区悬移质泥沙对磷污染物的吸附解吸特性[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 31 -36 .
[6] 李宽意,刘正文,王春忠,王传海,史加达,胡耀辉. 低溶解氧对苦草生长的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 670 -673 .
[7] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[8] 黄应生,,陈世俭,吴后建,,朱明勇,. 洪湖演变的驱动力及其生态保护对策分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 504 .
[9] 向悟生, 李先琨, 何成新, 吕仕洪, 陆树华. 石漠化山地复合生态系统评价——以广西平果县龙何屯生态重建示范区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 826 .
[10] 曹银贵,王 静,程 烨,刘爱霞,许 宁,郝 银,饶彩霞. 三峡库区土地利用变化与影响因子分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 748 .