长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (6): 1287-1397.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202106001

• 区域可持续发展 •    下一篇

长江经济带工业绿色转型与生态文明建设的协同效应研究

黄  成1,2,吴传清2,3,4   

  1. (1.清华大学社会科学学院,北京 100084;2.武汉大学中国发展战略与规划研究院,湖北 武汉 430072; 3.武汉大学经济与管理学院,湖北 武汉 430072; 4.武汉大学区域经济研究中心,湖北 武汉 430072)
  • 出版日期:2021-06-20 发布日期:2021-06-29

Research on the Synergetic Effect of Industrial Green Transformation and Ecological Civilization Construction in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

HUANG Cheng 1,2,WU Chuan-qing 2,3,4   

  1. (1. School of Social Sciences,Tsinghna University,Beijing 100084,China;  2. China Institute of Development Strategy and Planning,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China; 3. School of Economic and Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China;4. Centre for Regional Economic Research, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)
  • Online:2021-06-20 Published:2021-06-29

摘要: 测度长江经济带工业绿色转型效率和生态文明建设质量,把脉二者协同效应,对推进长江经济带绿色协同发展具有实践指导作用。在全国视野下,基于2011~2017年省级数据,采用Super-SBM模型测度长江经济带工业绿色转型效率,运用熵权法-Topsis评价模型测度长江经济带生态文明建设质量,构建耦合协调度模型实证研究长江经济带工业绿色转型与生态文明建设的协同效应。结果表明:长江经济带工业绿色转型效率低于全国平均水平,上中下游地区呈梯度递增空间格局,省际差异显著;长江经济带生态文明建设质量与全国平均水平基本持平,上中下游地区呈“V”型空间格局,省际差异较小;长江经济带各省份工业绿色转型效率与生态文明建设质量的协同系数普遍较低,且呈加剧趋势,主要原因是生态文明建设滞后于工业绿色转型。建议地方政府提高对工业绿色转型与生态文明建设协同发展的重视程度,着力扭转生态文明建设滞后于工业绿色转型的发展态势。特别要加大国土空间和生态环境治理保护力度,推动长江经济带中上游地区农业和工业生态化发展,普及生态文化,完善生态安全治理体系。

Abstract: It plays a practical and guiding role in promoting the green and coordinated development of Yangtze River Economic Belt by measuring industrial green transformation efficiency, ecological civilization construction quality, and the synergistic effect. The research of this paper is based on provincial data during 2011 to 2017 in a national perspective. Measure industrial green transformation efficiency in Yangtze River Economic Belt by Super-SBM model. Measure ecological civilization construction quality in Yangtze River Economic Belt by entropy weight method-topsis evaluation model. Research synergetic effect between industrial green transformation and ecological civilization construction in Yangtze River Economic Belt by builting coupling coordination degree model. The results show that industrial green transformation efficiency in Yangtze economic belt is lower than the national average, and the spatial pattern of the upper, middle and lower reaches in Yangtze economic belt is progressively increase. The industrial green transformation efficiency between provinces are significant differences. The ecological civilization construction quality in Yangtze River Economic Belt is basically the same as the national average, and the spatial pattern of upper, middle and lower reaches in Yangtze River Economic Belt show a “V”, but the inter-provincial difference is small. The synergy coefficient between industrial green transformation efficiency and ecological civilization construction quality in the provinces of Yangtze River Economic Belt are generally low, and this situation is becoming more and more significant. The main reason is that ecological civilization construction lags behind industrial green transformation. We suggest that local governments should pay more attention to the coordinated development between industrial green transformation and ecological civilization construction, as well striving to reverse the situation that ecological civilization construction lagging behind industrial green transformation. In particular, they must strengthen the protection of landspace and the ecological environment, and promoting agriculture and industry of upper and middle reaches in Yangtze economic belt develop towards a ecological way. Simultaneously, it is very important to popularize ecological culture among citizens, and improve the governance system of ecological security.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[2] 伍文琪, 罗贤, 黄玮。李运刚. 云南省水资源承载力评价与时空分布特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1385 .
[3] 王辉, 延军平, 王鹏涛, 武亚群. 多民族地区经济差异的空间格局演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1390 .
[4] 杨宏, 李会琳, 路璐. 嘉陵江(南充段)水体及其底泥中氨氧化微生物群落空间分布特征及其与环境因子关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1836 .
[5] 李恩康, 陆玉麒, 王 毅, 黄群芳, 郭 政. 城镇化对制度转型的影响——基于江苏13个市的脉冲响应函数分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1919 -1927 .
[6] 魏国恩, 朱 翔, 贺清云. 环长株潭城市群空间联系演变特征与对策研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1958 -1967 .
[7] 啜明英, 马骏, 刘德富, 杨正健. 整流幕对香溪河库湾水温特性影响数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2101 -2113 .
[8] 朱寅健. (新)环鄱阳湖区域交通网络通达性与旅游一体化发展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[9] 田 鹏, 李加林, 史小丽, 王丽佳, 刘瑞清. 浙江省土地利用格局时空变化及生态风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2697 -2706 .
[10] 危小建, 陈竹安, 张 蕾, 江 平, 吴 芳, . 引入城市扩张干扰效应的生态服务价值化方法改进[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 30 -38 .