长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (7): 1625-1637.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202107010

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

长株潭城市群人为热排放对城市热环境影响研究

陈一溥,郑伯红*   

  1. (中南大学建筑与艺术学院,湖南 长沙 410075)
  • 出版日期:2021-07-20 发布日期:2021-08-03

Study on the Impact of Human Heat Emission on the Urban Thermal Environment of Changsha Zhuzhou Xiangtan Urban Agglomeration

CHEN Yi-pu, ZHENG Bo-hong   

  1. (School of architecture and art,Central South University,Changsha 410075,China)
  • Online:2021-07-20 Published:2021-08-03

摘要: 采用“自上而下”的能源清单法,研究了长株潭城市群2017年人为热排放量及其时空分布特征;同时,利用中尺度天气预报模式(Weather Research and Forecasting,WRF)及其耦合的UCM对夏冬两季分别进行数值模拟试验,定量分析了不同类型建成区人为热排放增温效应的季节性差异。结果表明:(1)长株潭2017年人为热排放总量为3.49×1017J/a,平均人为热排放强度为14.22 W/m2,工业、建筑、交通和人体新城代谢对人为热的贡献率分别为48.15%、40%、11.3%和0.55%。(2)人为热的引入使得城市群主城区夏季和冬季的平均温度分别升高了约0.7℃和1.5℃;冬季增温效果是夏季的2倍。(3)不同密度分区人为热排放导致的增温效果不同,总的来说,工业/商业区>高密度住宅区>低密度住宅区。

Abstract: Based on the "top-down" energy inventory method, the anthropogenic heat emissions and their temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of Changsha Zhuzhou Xiangtan Urban Agglomeration in 2017 were studied. At the same time, the weather research and forecasting (WRF) model and its coupled UCM are used to carry out numerical simulation experiments in summer and winter respectively, and the seasonal differences of artificial heat emission warming effects in different types of built-up areas are quantitatively analyzed. The results show that: (1) in 2017, the total anthropogenic heat emission of Changsha Zhuzhou Xiangtan was 3.49×1017J/a, and the average anthropogenic heat emission intensity was 14.22 w/m2. The contribution rates of industry, construction, transportation and metabolism of human new towns to anthropogenic heat were 48.15%, 40%, 11.3% and 0.55%, respectively.(2) With the introduction of artificial heat, the average temperature of the main urban areas in summer and winter increased by about 0.7℃ and 1.5℃ respectively, and the effect of increasing temperature in winter was twice that in summer.(3) The effect of artificial heat emission in different density zones is different.In general, industrial / commercial area > high density residential area > low density residential area.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[2] 伍文琪, 罗贤, 黄玮。李运刚. 云南省水资源承载力评价与时空分布特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1385 .
[3] 王辉, 延军平, 王鹏涛, 武亚群. 多民族地区经济差异的空间格局演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1390 .
[4] 杨宏, 李会琳, 路璐. 嘉陵江(南充段)水体及其底泥中氨氧化微生物群落空间分布特征及其与环境因子关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1836 .
[5] 李恩康, 陆玉麒, 王 毅, 黄群芳, 郭 政. 城镇化对制度转型的影响——基于江苏13个市的脉冲响应函数分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1919 -1927 .
[6] 魏国恩, 朱 翔, 贺清云. 环长株潭城市群空间联系演变特征与对策研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1958 -1967 .
[7] 啜明英, 马骏, 刘德富, 杨正健. 整流幕对香溪河库湾水温特性影响数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2101 -2113 .
[8] 朱寅健. (新)环鄱阳湖区域交通网络通达性与旅游一体化发展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[9] 田 鹏, 李加林, 史小丽, 王丽佳, 刘瑞清. 浙江省土地利用格局时空变化及生态风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2697 -2706 .
[10] 谢五三, 吴 蓉, 丁小俊. 基于FloodArea模型的城市内涝灾害风险评估与预警[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2848 -2855 .