长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (2): 296-304.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202202004

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

贵州省城镇综合位序——规模分布变化及其特征

陆清平1,2,赵翠薇1,2,3,王  杰1   

  1. (1.贵州师范大学地理与环境科学学院,贵州 贵阳 550025;2.喀斯特山地生态环境保护与资源利用协同创新中心,贵州 贵阳 550025;
    3.喀斯特山地生态环境国家重点实验室培育基地,贵州 贵阳 550001)
  • 出版日期:2022-02-20 发布日期:2022-03-21

Comprehensive Rank of Cities and Towns in Guizhou Province:Changes in Size Distribution and Their Characteristics

LU Qing-ping1,2, ZHAO Cui-wei1,2,3, WANG Jie1   

  1. (1. School of Geography and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025,China; 2. Collaborative Innovation Center for Ecological Environmental Protection and Resource Utilization in Karst Mountainous Area, Guiyang 550025,China;3. State Key Laboratory Incubation Base for Karst Mountain Ecology Environment of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550001,China)
  • Online:2022-02-20 Published:2022-03-21

摘要: 为探究城镇规模发展及演化规律,解决单一指标难以全面表征城镇规模的问题,利用综合位序—规模法则,研究贵州省2000~2015年城镇规模分布特征及其变化规律。结果表明:2000~2015年贵州城镇规模遵循位序-规模法则,集中分布指数q值在 1.072 49~1.137 56 之间,趋近于位序—规模理想值1。中间城镇位序变化剧烈,两端城镇位序保持稳定,整体上表现出单分形特征。空间上呈现出西部、北部和西北部城镇位序较高,东部、南部城镇位序较低的梯度分布格局。省会贵阳市规模一直居首位,但城镇首位度指数小于1.3,其规模与末尾城镇的比,从2000年的32.09倍降低到2015年的6.35倍。综合位序—规模法则能有效刻画贵州城镇规模等级。需进一步增强贵州省会城市的带动作用。

Abstract: In order to explore the scale of urban development and its changes, and solve the problem that a single indicator cannot fully characterize the size of cities and towns, the comprehensive rank-scale law is used to study the characteristics of urban size distribution and its changes in Guizhou Province from 2000 to 2015. The results show that: From 2000 to 2015, the scale of Guizhou cities and towns followed the rank-scale law, the concentration distribution index q value was between 1.072 49-1.137 56, which approached the rank-scale ideal value 1. The order of the towns in the middle has changed drastically, and the order of the towns at both ends has hardly changed, showing a monofractal characteristic as a whole. Spatially, it presents a gradient distribution pattern in which cities and towns in the west, north and northwest are ranked high, while those in the east and south are low.The size of Guiyang which is the capital of Guizhou Province, has always been the first, but the urban primacy index is less than 1.3. The ratio of the size of Guiyang to the last towns has dropped from 32.09 times in 2000 to 6.35 times in 2015. The comprehensive rank-scale law can effectively describe the scale of Guizhou cities and towns.The leading role of the first town in Guizhou needs to be further enhanced.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚琳, 沈竞, 温新龙, 高超. WRF模式参数化方案对江西山地风电场的风模拟研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1380 .
[2] 孙惠惠, 章新平, 罗紫东, 尚程鹏, 贺新光, 饶志国.  近53 a来长江流域极端降水指数特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1879 .
[3] 吴浪, 周廷刚, 温莉, 刘晓璐, 朱晓波. 基于遥感数据的PM2.5与城市化的时空关系研究——以成渝城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2142 -2152 .
[4] 方琳, 吴凤平, 王新华, 余燕团.  

基于共同前沿SBM模型的农业用水效率测度及改善潜力 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2293 -2304 .

[5] 吕乐婷, 王晓蕊, 孙才志, 张 杰. 基于SWAT模型的细河流域蓝水绿水资源量时空分布研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 39 -47 .
[6] 胡兴坤, 高 雷, 杨 浩, 刘绍平, 陈大庆, 段辛斌 . 长江中游黄石江段鱼类早期资源现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 60 -67 .
[7] 胡晓, 余英俊, 魏永才, 洪亮, 张永年, 石小涛, 吴睿. 基于过鱼效果评估的涵洞鱼道堰式挡板性能研究与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 134 -143 .
[8] 秦立, 付宇文, 吴起鑫, 安艳玲, 刘瑞禄, 吕婕梅, 吴振宇. 赤水河流域土地利用结构对氮素输出的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 175 -183 .
[9] 李艳, 马百胜, 杨宣. 两类ENSO事件对中国东部地区极端降水的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 469 -482 .
[10] 陈 炳, 曾 刚, 曹贤忠, 宓泽锋. 长三角城市群生态文明建设与城市化耦合协调发展研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 530 -541 .