长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (3): 537-550.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202203005

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江中游旅游生态效率与区域生态安全的空间一致性研究

李  竹1,吴  卫1,2*   

  1. (1.湖南师范大学 旅游学院,湖南 长沙 410081;2.湖南财政经济学院地理研究所,湖南 长沙 410205)
  • 出版日期:2022-03-20 发布日期:2022-04-07

 Study on  Spatial Consistency of Tourism Eco-efficiency and Regional Eco-security in Middle Reaches of Yangtze River

LI Zhu1, WU Wei1,2   

  1. (1.College of Tourism, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China;2.Hunan Institute of Economic Geography,Hunan University of Finance and Economics,Changsha 410205, China)
  • Online:2022-03-20 Published:2022-04-07

摘要: 厘清旅游生态效率与区域生态安全的空间一致性能为旅游生态价值研究提供新思路。以2005~2018年长江中游各地级市为研究区域,分别利用单一指标法、PSR模型、空间一致性系数评价旅游生态效率、区域生态安全及两者空间一致性,运用空间分析法研究其时空分异特征,采用Logistic和Probit模型探讨其影响因素。结果表明:(1)研究期间,长江中游旅游生态效率和区域生态安全呈上升趋势。(2)两者重心距离由接近到渐远,表明两者之间存在“倒U型”变化趋势。(3)均衡型区域增多,非均衡型区域减少,两类型空间集聚强度皆呈增长趋势。(4)空间一致性均衡型受资源禀赋、社会保障和环境建设正向影响,受人口、人均基本生活和科技进步负向影响。(5)空间一致性非均衡型受人均基本生活、科技进步、产业结构和环境污染正向影响,受社会保障、经济增长和环境建设负向影响。

Abstract: Clarifying the spatial consistency between tourism eco-efficiency and regional eco-security can provide new ideas for the study of tourism ecological value. In this paper, the prefecture-level cities in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River from 2005 to 2018 were used as the research area. Single index method, PSR model and spatial consistency coefficient were used to evaluate tourism eco-efficiency, regional eco-security and their spatial consistency. Spatial analysis was used to study the spatio-temporal differentiation characteristics of tourism eco-efficiency, regional eco-security and their spatial consistency. Logistic and Probit models are used to explore the influencing factors. The results show that: (1) During the study period, the tourism eco-efficiency and regional eco-security in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River showed an upward trend. (2) The distance between the center of gravity of the two groups was from close to far, which indicates that there was an “inverted U-shaped” trend between them. (3) The number of equilibrium regions increased, while the number of non-equilibrium regions decreased. The spatial agglomeration intensity of the two types showed an increasing trend. (4) The equilibrium types of spatial consistency were positively affected by resource endowment, social security and environmental construction, while negatively affected by population, per capita basic living standards and scientific and technological progress. (5) The non-equilibrium types of spatial consistency were positively affected by per capita basic living standard, scientific and technological progress, industrial structure and environmental pollution, while negatively affected by social security, economic growth and environmental construction.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 袁博, 郭梦京, 周孝德, 郑兴. 气候变化及人类活动对河流溶解性有机质(DOM)影响的研究进展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1440 .
[2] 张路路, 郑新奇, 蔡玉梅.  基于投影寻踪模型的湖南省土地多功能时空演变分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1754 .
[3] 廖炜, 李璐, 杨伟, 吴宜进. 城镇化过程中的流域面源污染时空变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1776 .
[4] 奚世军 安裕伦 李阳兵 蔡沛伶 李瑞 龙立美 陈啟英. 基于景观格局的喀斯特山区流域生态风险评估 ——以贵州省乌江流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[5] 张亚飞 廖和平 李义龙. 基于反规划与FLUS模型的城市增长边界划定研究——以重庆市渝北区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 王先甲 秦颖 杨文俊 袁睢秋. 湖库泥沙资源化多目标优化配置研究综述[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[7] 秦立 吴起鑫. 赤水河流域土地利用结构对氮素输出的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[8] 刘晋高, 诸葛亦斯, 刘德富, 张佳磊, 马骏, 余晓.  

防控三峡水库支流水华的生态约束型优化调度 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2379 .

[9] 袁凯华, 张 苗, 甘臣林, 陈银蓉, 朱庆莹, 杨慧琳. 基于碳减排目标的省域碳生态补偿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 21 -29 .
[10] 顿佳耀, 王初, 姚东京, 黄敏慧, 许金鑫. 崇明东滩盐沼表层沉积物有机碳空间分布特征及其来源示踪研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 157 -165 .