长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (8): 1845-1852.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202208018

• 创刊三十周年纪念专辑 • 上一篇    下一篇

川中丘陵区镶嵌式田坎土壤可蚀性变化特征及影响因素

郑江坤1,2,冉至立1,韩雨婧1,胡水蓝1,刘思艺1,曾衡3
  

  1. (1.四川农业大学林学院,长江上游林业生态工程四川省重点实验室,长江上游森林资源保育与生态安全国家林业和草原局重点实验室,四川 成都 611130;2. 成都水生态文明建设研究重点基地,四川 成都 611231;3.四川省遂宁市安居区水土保持服务中心,四川 遂宁 629006)

  • 出版日期:2022-08-20 发布日期:2022-09-16

Soil Erodibility Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Embedded Terrace Ridge in the Hilly Area of Sichuan Basin

ZHENG Jiang-kun1,2,RAN Zhi-li1,HAN Yu-jing1,HU Shui-lan1,LIU Si-yi1, ZENG Heng3   

  1. (1.College of forestry, Sichuan Province Key Laboratory of Ecological Forestry Engineering on the Upper Reaches of the
     Yangtze River, National Forestry and Grassland Administration Key Laboratory of Forest Resources Conservation and Ecological Safety on the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China; 2. Key Research Base of Water Ecological Civilization Construction of Chengdu, Chengdu 611231, China; 3. Soil and Water Conservation Service 
    Center of Anju District in Suining City, Suining 629006, China)
  • Online:2022-08-20 Published:2022-09-16

摘要: 田坎土壤可蚀性是影响梯田稳定的关键因素,为探讨不同修建年限田坎土壤可蚀性,以遂宁市安居区镶嵌式田坎为研究对象,结合野外采样和室内分析,研究了镶嵌式田坎修建1、3和5年的土壤可蚀性(K值)变化及影响因素。结果表明: (1) K值范围0.05~0.06 (t·hm2·h)/(MJ·mm·hm2),田的K值大于坎,随着镶嵌式田坎的修建年限的增加,坎K值呈减小趋势,建成5年时达显著性水平。(2)坎黏粒含量随修建年限递减,而粉粒与砂粒含量呈递增趋势;建成1年的坎土壤容重显著大于建成3年和5年;建成1年和3年时,田和坎的土壤团聚体破坏率(PAD)、不稳定团粒指数(ELT)、风干土团聚体分形维数(风干D)、水稳性团聚体分形维数(水稳D)、风干性团聚体平均质量直径(风干MWD)和风干性团聚体几何平均直径(风干GMD)有显著差异;建成5年时则无显著差异,说明建成5年时田和坎的土壤物理性质趋于一致。(3) 镶嵌式田坎上的土壤有机质含量随修建年限呈增加趋势,建成5年时达显著性水平。(4)K值与PAD、ELT和水稳D呈极显著正相关,与风干GMD、水稳MWD呈极显著负相关。镶嵌式田坎K值与团聚体关系紧密,建成5年后K值显著减小。

Abstract: The stability of the terrace ridge is a key factor for terrace construction. Meanwhile soil erodibility has effect on the stability of the terrace ridge. To discuss soil erodibility of terrace ridge, embedded terrace ridges were taken as the research object in Anju district of Suining City, which were built in 2015, 2017 and 2019, respectively. Combined with field sampling and indoor analysis, the K of EPIC model was adopted to represent soil erodibility characteristics. The soil erodibility and influencing factors of terrace ridges were analyzed.The results showed that the K value ranged from 0.05 to 0.06(t·hm2·h)/ (MJ·mm·hm2). With increase of construction years, the K value decreased, soil erodibility decreased significantly when embedded terrace ridges were constructed after 5 years. With increase of construction years, the contained clay particles decreased, meanwhile the content of silt and sand particles increased. There were significant differences in soil PAD, ELT, D, air-dried MWD and air-dried GMD between terrace field and terrace ridge at 1 year or 3 years after terrace ridge construction, but no significant differences at 5 years after terrace ridge construction. The soil bulk density at 1 year after terrace ridge construction was significantly higher than those of 3 years and 5 years, which indicated that the physical properties of embedded terrace ridges improved significantly after 3 years construction.With increase of construction years,soil organic matter increased and reached a significant level at 5 years after construction.K was significantly positively correlated with PAD, ELT and water stable D, significantly negatively correlated with air-dried GMD and water stable MWD, and significantly negatively correlated with air-dried MWD and water stable GMD. At 5 years after terrace ridge construction, K was significantly reduced, which was strongly related to soil aggregates. Therefore, embedded terrace ridges can be popularized and applied in the area. 


No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨佳, 葛馨, 吴起鑫. 贵阳市主城区空气质量指数时空分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1827 .
[2] 童庆蒙 张露 张俊飚. 土地流转能否提升农民生活满意度?——来自湖北省江汉平原地区的经验证据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[3] 代培, 阎明军, 周游, 周彦锋, 熊满晖, 卢剑达, 刘凯.  

太湖五里湖沿岸带浮游植物群落生态特征(2014~2015) [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2348 -2357 .

[4] 周晟吕, 李月寒, 胡 静, 封竞男. 基于问卷调查的上海市大气环境质量改善的支付意愿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2419 -2424 .
[5] 屈小娥. 中国生态效率的区域差异及影响因素——基于时空差异视角的实证分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2673 -2683 .
[6] 孙传谆, 甄霖, 刘小玲, 刘通, 吴顺辉, 李景刚. 小尺度上蜜蜂传粉服务与耕地利用集约水平之间权衡关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 112 -121 .
[7] 刘 菊, 傅 斌, 张成虎, 胡治鹏, 王玉宽. 基于InVEST模型的岷江上游生态系统水源涵养量与价值评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 577 -585 .
[8] 张亚飞, 廖和平, 李义龙, . 基于反规划与FLUS模型的城市增长边界划定研究——以重庆市渝北区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(04): 757 -767 .
[9] 盛叶子, 曾蒙秀, 彭海军, 李 雪, 高 洋, 朱丽东, 李凤全, 胡忠行, 苏 婕, 余奕泓. 1470~1949年贵州地区干湿序列的重建及其影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(06): 1354 -1364 .
[10] 俞雅文, 徐东坡. 运用碳氮稳定同位素技术探究中华绒螯蟹与无齿螳臂相手蟹的营养生态位特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(09): 2092 -2099 .