长江流域资源与环境 >> 2025, Vol. 34 >> Issue (11): 2445-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202511006

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江中游地区数字化绿色化协同转型发展水平测度与提升路径研究

吴传清1,2,3,宋用九1*,邓和顺1   

  • 出版日期:2025-11-20 发布日期:2025-11-20

Measurement and Enhancement Path of Coordination Degree of Synergistic Transformation and Development of Digitalization and Greenization in the Middle Yangtze River Region

WU Chuan-qing1,2,3 ,SONG Yong-jiu1 ,DENG He-shun1   

  1. (1. School of Economics and Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China; 2. China Institute of Development Strategy and Planning,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China; 3. Center for Reginal Economics Research,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)
  • Online:2025-11-20 Published:2025-11-20

摘要: 研究数字化绿色化协同转型发展的时空演变特征及内在机理,对促进长江中游地区高质量发展具有重要的实践意义。基于2011~2020年中国沪深股市A股上市公司数据,采用耦合协调度模型测度长江中游三省29个城市数字化绿色化协同转型发展水平,采用Kernel密度估计、Dagum基尼系数和空间杜宾模型等方法探究长江中游地区双化协同水平的时空演变、区域差异及影响因素。研究结果表明:(1)长江中游地区数字化、绿色化转型发展水平稳步提升,双化协同水平表现出良好增长态势。(2)核密度估计表明,双化协同水平的空间差异呈收敛特征,鄂湘赣三省极化现象差异明显。(3)Dagum基尼系数分解表明,双化协同水平的地区总体差异先升后降,并主要来源于地区内差异。(4)经济发展水平、数字金融水平、信息化水平、对外开放水平、政府规制水平和生态环境水平是影响双化协同的主要因素,这一结论在稳健性检验后仍然成立,并对各因素影响效应的演变过程进行了异质性分析。进一步提升长江中游地区双化协同水平的实践路径主要有:优化要素配置,消除城市双化协同的两极分化;采取政策引导,缩小城市双化协同的地区差异;强化因城施策,激发城市双化协同的内在动力。

Abstract: It is of great practical significance to study the spatio-temporal evolution characteristics and internal mechanism of the coordinated transformation and development of digitalization and greenization for promoting the high-quality economic and social development in the Middle Yangtze River region. Based on the data of A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets from 2011 to 2020,this paper used the coupling coordination model to measure the coordination degree of dual synergy transformation and development of digitalization and greenization in 29 cities of three provinces in the Middle Yangtze River region. Kernel density estimation,Dagum Gini coefficient and spatial Durbin model were used to explore the spatio-temporal evolution,regional differences and influencing factors of the dual synergy level. The results showed that: (1) The development level of digitalization and greenization had been steadily improved,and the dual synergy level demonstrated a favourable growth trend. (2) The spatial disparity in the dual synergy level exhibited a convergence tendency,and the polarization phenomenon of three provinces displayed distinct contrasts. (3) The overall regional differences in the dual synergy level enlarged first and then reduced, and mainly came from intra-regional differences. (4) The major driving factors to promote the coordination degree of urban dual synergy were the level of economic development,the level of digital finance,the degree of informatization,the level of opening up,the level of government regulation and the level of ecological environment. This conclusion remained robust after a rigorous testing. A heterogeneity analysis was conducted on the dynamic impacts of these factors. Furthermore,the main practical paths to enhance the coordination degree of dual synergy in the study area were as follows: (1) To optimize the allocation of factors to eliminate the polarization of the dual synergy of digitalization and greenization; (2) To adopt policy guidance to narrow the regional differences of the dual synergy of digitalization and greenization; (3) To strengthen the implementation of policies based on the individual city to stimulate the internal power of the dual synergy of digitalization and greenization.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!