RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (01): 26-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201401004

• Contents • Previous Articles     Next Articles

STUDY ON THE URBANRURAL CULTURAL INTEGRATIONS SPACE MEASUREMENT AND MECHANISM OF WUHAN CITY CIRCLE

ZHU Yuanyuan| ZENG Juxin| HAN Yong   

  1. (College of Urban and Environment Science|CentralChina Normal University|Wuhan 430079|China)
  • Online:2014-01-20

Abstract:

Cultural integration is one of the most important fields in Cultural Geography. Especially, urbanrural cultural integration has become a highlight in academic and political circles. Urbanrural cultural integration refers to two paralleled cultural systems, the factors of which interact and merger each other to form an organic and harmonious culture system. Using a case study of Wuhan City Circle, this paper aims to construct Measure Index System (MIS), around spatial measure of integration for urbanrural cultural integration, following scientific, general and practical principles. The MIS is established from following levels of four functional indexes—urbanrural integration in cultural resources index, cultural factors index, cultural industries index and cultural development index, twelve goal decomposition indexes and twenty-four detailed indicators. By using the method of factor analysis, we extract three principal divisors—economic divisor, potential divisor and security divisor, and then compute the integration degree for the fortyeight counties. According to the computation, four strength regions are divided, which include the fullyintegrated region, wellintegrated region, weakintegrated region and weakerintegrated region. We argue that the spatial disparity of urbanrural cultural integration in Wuhan City Circle, by and large, presents the structure that Wuhan city is the center of cultural integration and as the distance increasing, the intensity decreases, especially along with “JingGuang” railway and the Yangtze river economic zone, the counties in which shows a stronger integration than other regions with the same distance. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the difference of urban-rural cultural resources is the fundamental factor causing the spatial structure disparity. The paper demonstrates that 1) the essence of urbanrural cultural structure disparity is resulted by the cultural resource difference between urban and rural. Culture resources can bring about the direct and indirect economic benefits, including cultural heritage, cultural groups, culture investment, and culture construction and so on. In the process of integration, narrowing the gap between urban and rural cultural resources will enhance the level of cultural integration through exploring the rural culture resources, organizing effectively cultural activity and improving the comprehensive quality of rural people; 2) to improve the cultural system is the key point for the integration. Urbanrural cultural system is constituted by material, spiritual, behavioral and institutional factors which form the cultural structure according to certain combination; 3) the foundation of integration is to harmonize urbanrural cultural industries. Cultural industries are part of cultural enterprises, which fully reflect the economic attribute of culture. Thus the harmony of cultural industries is the order and powerful way for the integration; 4) the ultragoal of integration is the scientific development of urbanrural culture. Urbanrural cultural integration is a process of preferential orientation, in which rural traditional culture will be critically inherited, and urban culture selectively absorbed. It is a twoway evolution where excellent culture will be taken in, while backward one abandoned. It must be a process, in which only based on the reorganization of disparity and complementarity between urban and rural area, the interaction between them will go on the track of being order, scientific and gradually improved

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] KOU Liuxiu, BAO Cunkuan, JIANG Dahe. APPLICATION OF ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR URBAN PLANNING[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2008, 17(1): 119 .
[2] YANG Shan. MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL PATTERN IN NANJING[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2004, 13(1): 7 -11 .
[3] ZHANG Wei-hao, SONG Li-rong, XU Xiao-qing, LIU Yong-ding, ZHANG Xi-hui. PRIMARY RESEARCH OF THE MICROCYSTIN'S FATE IN NATURAL AQUATIC SYSTEM[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2004, 13(1): 84 -88 .
[4] CHEN Mingxi,CHEN Fangqing,LIU Defu. APPLICATION OF LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY IN CONSTRUCTION |OF NATURAL RIVER LEVEE[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2007, 16(1): 97 -101 .
[5] LI An-Rong, Liu-Cong-Jiang, Chen- Chuan, Hong-Fu-Shun, Wang-Bao-Li, Li-Jun, Guan-Jin. null[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2009, 18(4): 350 .
[6] HUANG Ti-Sheng, Wang- Jiang. STUDY ON THE LEGISLATION OF UTILIZATION OF WATERRESOURCES FROM INTERNATIONAL RIVERS IN CHINA[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2009, 18(5): 416 .
[7] QIN Jie-| Zhou-Zhi-Xiang-| Teng-Meng-Jun-| Wang-Yan-Yan-| Shi-Mei-Rong-. EVALUATION ON LANDSCAPE SENSITIVITY OF JIUFENG URBAN FOREST RESERVE IN WUHAN[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2009, 18(5): 453 .
[8] ZHANG Xiao-Nan, WANG Ke-Lin, ZHANG Meng-Yang, ZHANG Wei, FAN Fei-De-. GRADIENT ANALYSIS OF LANDSCAPE PATTERN IN KARST AREA UNDER EFFECTS OF ANTHROPOGENIC ACTIVITIES[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2009, 18(12): 1187 .
[9] GUO Jin-Song-| He- Yang-| Fu- Chuan-| Fang- Fang-| Li- Zhe-| Yang- Yan-. INVESTIGATION OF SOIL NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS IN WATER FLUCTUATION ZONE IN CENTRAL DISTRICT OF THREE GORGES RESERVOIR AREA[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2010, 19(03): 311 .
[10] ZHANG Yi-Ran, QIU Dao-Chi, LI Yan-. ANALYSIS OF RURAL COLLECTIVE CONSTRUCTION LAND INTENSIFICATION IN THE THREEGORGES RESERVOIR AREA[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2010, 19(z1): 40 .