RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (1): 54-63.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202101006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Influencing Factors and Spatial Distribution Identification of Farmland Conversion at the Urban-Rural Fringe:A Case Study of Pudong New Area, Shanghai

DUAN Xin-yu 1,2,CAI Yin-ying 1,2,ZHANG An-lu 1,2   

  1. (1.College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agriculture University, Wuhan 430070, China; 2.Institute of Ecological and Environmental Economics, Huazhong Agriculture University, Wuhan 430070, China)
  • Online:2021-01-20 Published:2021-02-04

Abstract: It is helpful to protect high-quality farmland and permanent basic farmland by accurately identifying the influencing factors and spatial distribution characteristic at the urban-rural fringe. In this paper, we take Shanghai Pudong New Area as a typical example of urban-rural fringe. Based on the difference between the conversion probability and the conversion rate on patch scale, a hurdle model is constructed to identify the key influencing factors of farmland conversion. Furthermore, based on the estimation results of the hurdle model, we improved the risk assessment model to evaluate the risk of farmland conversion, and analyzed the possible spatial distribution of farmland conversion by hot spot analysis. The results show that: (1) The farmland conversion process in Pudong New Area is not complete, the average conversion rate is about 19% on patch scale, and there is obvious spatial distribution characteristics for these converted plots, such as the form of block or strip. (2) The farmland conversion process is very complicated, only the key influencing factors have significant dual impacts on it, including the nearest distance between the plots and water source, rural road, town, whether the plots in basic farmland conservation area or within urban development boundary or not. (3) According to the results of risk assessment and hot spot analysis, the farmland is divided into four types: risk area, fragile area, sensitive area and safety area. Based on the division results showed above, about 2 426.86 hm2 farmland are at risk of large scale conversion, about 5 449.7 and 3 793 hm2 farmland are located in fragile area and sensitive area, about 15 253.5 hm2 farmland are left in agricultural production safety area with low farmland conversion probability, which could be used as the permanent basic farmland of the city for key construction. The study attempts to identify possible farmland conversion plots and their spatial distribution in Pudong New Area, hoping to provide reference for local governments to strengthen farmland protection and agricultural infrastructure investment.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] ZHANG Ying-hao , CHEN Jiang-long, CHENG Yu. Study on the Influence Mechanism of Environmental Regulation on Green Economy Efficiency in China-Empirical Analysis Based on Super Efficiency Model and Spatial Panel Metering Model[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(11): 2407 -2418 .
[2] LIU Jinke, HAN Guilin, YANG Kunhua, LIU Man. Temporal and Spatial Variations of Dissolved Carbon in the Jiulongjiang River Basin[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(11): 2578 -2587 .
[3] PAN Jing, SHEN Jian-zhong, SUN Lin-dan, XIONG lei. Analysis on the Otolith Core Elemental Fingerprint of Young-of-the-year (YOY) Silver Carp from Yangtze River and Ganjiang River and Its Application in Stock Identification[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(12): 2740 -2746 .
[4] YANG Da-yuan, HUANG Xian-jin, SHI Li-feng, LI Sheng-feng. Erosion and Siltation Monitoring Along the River Bank of Yangzhong City During 1973-2017 by Remote Sensing and Analyzing the Bank Collapse[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(12): 2796 -2804 .
[5] HE Sha-sha, ZHU Wen-bo, CUI Yao-ping, HE Chun-long, YE Lu-pei, FENG Xiao-yan, ZHU Lian-qi, . Study on Soil Erosion Characteristics of Qihe Watershed  in Taihang Mountains Based on the InVEST Model[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(02): 426 -439 .
[6] . Spatial-temporal variation of Net Primary Productivity and its response to climate change in Jianghan Plain from 2000 to 2015[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 0, (): 0 .
[7] . Remote Sensing Monitoring of Tropospheric NO2 Density in Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration Based on OMI Data[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 0, (): 0 .
[8] . Research on farmers’ conservation tillage technology adoption behavior from the perspective of social embeddedness:Based on the survey data of 668 farmers in Hebei, Anhui and Hubei provinces[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 0, (): 0 .
[9] SUN Hui-hui, ZHANG Xin-ping, LI Zu-xian, LIU Fu-ji, SHANG Cheng-Peng, LUO Zi-dong, ZHOU Hui. Inhomogeneity Distribution of Different Types of Precipitation in the Yangtze River Basin[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(06): 1422 -1433 .
[10] SUN Wei, CHEN Wen, LIU Chong-gang, . Correlation Evaluation of Water Sensitivity and Construction Land Expansion in Taihu Lake Basin[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(07): 1575 -1582 .