RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (10): 2318-2332.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202210019

Previous Articles    

Does Financial Support for Agriculture Improve Agricultural Carbon Productivity?  ——Analysis on the Mediating Effects of Planting Structure and Mechanization Level

HUANG Wei-hua1,2, QI Chun-jie1, HUANG Yan-zhong1, NIE Fei1   

  1. (1.College of Economics&Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; 2. School of Economics and Management, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China)
  • Online:2022-10-20 Published:2022-10-27

Abstract: Climate warming has become an immediate threat to mankind, Carbon emissions from agricultural production constitute one of the important sources of greenhouse gases. In this context, clarifying the logic of carbon productivity growth in agriculture is conducive to “maintaining growth” and “promoting emission reduction” from the source.On the basis of a the theoretical analysis of the effect mechanism of financial support for agriculture on agricultural carbon productivity, this paper calculates the agricultural carbon productivity using the provincial panel data of China from 1994 to 2019, and constructs a mediation effect model to test the effect mechanism of financial support for agriculture on agricultural carbon productivity. The results show that: (1) From 1994 to 2019, China’s agricultural carbon productivity presented an increasing trend, with an average annual growth rate of 2.40%, The improvement of agricultural carbon productivity was mainly attributable to technological progress. (2) Financial support for agriculture has a significant direct promoting effect on the growth of agricultural carbon productivity. It also plays a vital role in promoting the increase of agricultural output and inhibiting the generation of carbon emissions, that is, it has the functions of “maintaining growth” and “promoting emission reduction”. (3)Financial support to agriculture can also affect agricultural carbon productivity through the partial mediating effects of agricultural planting structure and agricultural mechanization level. The mediating effects of the two channels accounted for 16.58% and 11.07% of the total effect, respectively, and the results remained valid after the endogeneity and robustness tests.Therefore, this paper provides empirical evidence for the role of financial support for agriculture in both “maintaining growth” and “promoting emission reduction”, and puts forward some policy suggestions based on empirical results.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] ZHONG Ye-xi, FU Yu, ZHU Zhi-zhou, WANG Xiao-jing. Network Structure of Listed Companies Based on the Relationship of Parent and Subsidiary Enterprises:A Case of the Middle Yangtze Urban Agglomeration[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(08): 1725 .
[2] WANG Lei, LI Cheng-li.  

The Effect of Multi-Center Structure of Urban Agglomerations in Central China [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(10): 2231 -2240 .

[3] TONG Xiao-rong, YANG Qing-yuan, BI Guo-hua, . Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Land Use Changes in Chongqing  during 2000-2015[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(11): 2481 -2495 .
[4] KANG Ting-ting, XU Huan, ZHANG Chun-hua, HU Zhao-ling. Estimation and analysis on the Temporal-spatial Variations of Cropland Maximum Light Use Efficiency at Regional Scale[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(12): 2766 -2774 .
[5] CHENG Liang, GUO Zhong-lu , QIN Jia-hui . Effects of Long-Term Fertilization on Soil Anti-Erodibility Under Wheat-Maize Rotation System in Mid-Subtropical, China[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(01): 212 -221 .
[6] HUANG Yue, HUANG Zhi-lin, XIAO Wen-fa, ZENG Li-xiong, MA Liang. Trend Analysis with Mann-Kendall Test on Water Quality of the Mainstream Inflow and Outflow for the Three Gorges Reservoir of Yangtze River[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(04): 950 -961 .
[7] LUO Ruoyu, ZHONG Yilin. Sociospatial Structure of Chengdu and Its Evolution(2000~2010)[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 0, (): 768 -782 .
[8] HAN Jing, RUI Yang, MA Teng, WU Peng, CHAO Jing. Evolution and Influencing Factors of Inter Provincial Distribution Pattern of National Garden Counties[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(04): 829 -838 .
[9] LIU Xiao-yang, HUANG Xiao-dong, DING Zhi-wei. Spatial Pattern and Its Influencing Factors of Informationization Level at County Level in Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(06): 1262 -1275 .
[10] GE Yun-jian, WU Xiao-han. Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Historical Flood Disasters in Jiangsu Province[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2019, 28(08): 1998 -2007 .