RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN >> 2013, Vol. 22 >> Issue (11): 1369-.

• Contents • Previous Articles    

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND AGRICULTURAL NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION:DECOMPOSITION MODEL AND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS

LIANG Liutao1, QU Futian2, FENG Shuyi2   

  1. (1.College of Environment and Planning,Henan University,Kaifeng 475004,China;2.China Center for Land Policy Research,Nanjing Agricultural University,Nanjing 210095,China
  • Online:2013-10-20

Abstract:

Since the reform and openingup in 1978,institutional innovation and technological progress have promoted the development of agricultural economy.However,due to the “threehigh (high energy consumption,high investment,and high waste)” mode of agricultural production,great achievements in agricultural development were largely at the expense of the ecological environment.Agricultural development and environmental protection have become an increasingly prominent conflict.Therefore,it is an important and urgent task to solve the contradiction among agricultural development,resource utilization and ecological environment protection.Following Islam,this paper developed a theoretical model to decompose the relationship between economic development and agricultural nonpoint source pollution.Using provincial level panel data from year 1990 to 2010,this paper investigated the driving mechanisms of the evolution of agricultural nonpoint source pollution in order to provide the theoretical basis for the control and management of agricultural nonpoint source pollution.The main conclusions are as follows.(1) The evolution of agricultural nonpoint source pollution was simultaneously influenced by the scale effect,the structure effect and the abatement effect.The scale effect was the effect of the scale of agricultural economic activity on agricultural nonpoint source pollution.Economic production consumed natural resources and produced waste,and therefore had a negative impact on the environment.The structure effect reflected the effect of the share of different industrial output on agricultural nonpoint source pollution.In different industries,factor inputs and production processes were different.Therefore,different industrial output had different impact on the environment.The abatement effect reflected the effect of the demand for environmental quality and the increase of environmental investment due to the increase of the level of economic development,technological progress,and the reform of agricultural environmental management system on agricultural nonpoint source pollution.(2) Empirical results show that the scale effect positively affected agricultural nonpoint source pollution,indicating that the expansion of the scale of agricultural production and rural population increased agricultural nonpoint source pollution.The two important aspects of the structure effect,i.e.the rise of the proportion of cash crop as well as the production value of livestock and poultry,increased agricultural nonpoint source pollution as well.The abatement effect due to technological progress and economic development started to play a role in effectively reducing agricultural nonpoint source pollution.This made the coordinated development between agricultural production and ecological environment possible

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] LI Chong-ming, HUANG Zhen-li. STUDY ON THE POLLUTANT LOADS INTO THREE GORGES RESERVOIR (Ⅱ)——POLLUTANT LOAD PREDICTIONS AFTER IMPOUNDMENT[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2006, 15(1): 97 -106 .
[2] LI Jia, LI Siyue, TAN Xiang, ZHANG Quanfa. WATER QUALITY APPRAISAL ALONG THE WATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM OF THE MIDDLE ROUTE OF THE SOUTH TO NORTH WATER TRANSFER PROJECT, CHINA[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2008, 17(5): 693 .
[3] ZOU Limin, WANG Chao, FENG Shilong. POTENTIAL BIOLOGICAL TOXICITY ASSESSMENT ON HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS OF XUANWU LAK[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2008, 17(2): 280 .
[4] CHEN Shuang,WANG Jin,. LEVEL OF URBANIZATION AND ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS OF IMMIGRATORY POPULATION IN THE TAIHU WATERSHED[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2004, 13(6): 524 -529 .
[5] ZHANG Wenguang, HU Yuanman,LIU Miao, YANG Zhaoping, CHANG Yu,LI Xiuzhen,YANG Meng, WEN Qingcun,. ESTIMATION OF THE GAINS AND LOSSES OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICE VALUES BASED ON LAND USE/COVERAGE CHANGE —A CASE OF UPPER REACHES OF MINJIANG RIVER[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2007, 16(6): 821 .
[6] LI Guixiang,MENG Guangtao,FANG Xiangjing,GUO Liqun,CHAI Yong,HE Liping,ZHANG Zhenghai. DISTRIBUTION OF MAJOR FOREST VEGETATION TYPES OF JINSHAJIANG RIVER BASIN IN YUNNAN PROVINCE[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2008, 17(1): 51 .
[7] FENG Xinling,LUO Longcheng,QIU Lili,. R/S ANALYSIS ON FUTURE CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE CITY OF CHENGDU[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2008, 17(1): 83 .
[8] GUO Jie, OU Minghao, LIU Qiong, OU Weixin. ON TREND AND DRIVING FORCES OF CULTIVATED LAND USE CHANGE IN JIANGSU PROVINCE[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2009, 18(2): 139 .
[9] LIU Zhi-Yong-| LAI Ge-Yang-| BO Shao-Meng-. SIMULATION OF HYDROLOGICAL EFFECTS OF VEGETATION EVOLUTION IN HEADSTREAM OF GANJIANG[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2009, 18(5): 446 .
[10] LI Yong-Le, TUN Qun. ECONOMIC GROWTH AND QUANTITY CHANGE OF CULTIVATED LAND——COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS AND GRANGER CAUSALITY TEST[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2011, 20(1): 33 .