RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (04): 573-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201404018

Previous Articles     Next Articles

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GEOCHEMICAL ELEMENTS ACCUMULATION IN PALAEOFLOOD AND MODERN FLOOD SLACKWATER DEPOSITS IN THE UPPER HANJIANG RIVER VALLEY

GUO Yongqiang, HUANG Chunchang, PANG Jiangli, ZHA Xiaochun, ZHOU Yali   

  1. (College of Tourism and Environmental Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xian 710062, China)
  • Online:2014-04-20

Abstract:

The upper Hanjiang River basin,the water source area of Middle Route of South to North water transfer project of China,is controlled by subtropical monsoonal climate.The rainstorms in the summer and longlasting rains in the autumn often cause great floods.The most recent large floods occurred on 19 July,2010 and 19 September,2011.Hydrologic environment information of large floods is often recorded by slackwater deposits (SWD) in the convex river bank,tributary mouth and wide channel etc.Slackwater deposits (SWD) are actually suspended sediment load of the flood at a highstage stagnant environment.Flood SWD,the product of soil erosion and rock weathering,is closely related to the surface materials during flood period and human actives.In the recent years,palaeoflood SWD were found at several sites along the upper Hanjiang River valley.These SWDs often inserted in the loesspalaeosol and slope clastic deposits.Geochemical elements including major elements and heavy metals accumulation in palaeoflood and modern flood SWD in the upper Hanjiang River valley were measured and analyzed.These results showed that palaeoflood SWD had high Na2O and CaO content and low K2O.UCCnormalized abundances of major elements SiO2,Al2O3,Fe2O3,TiO2,MgO and MnO for palaeoflood SWD were similar to that of modern flood SWD.On the one hand,the chemical index of alteration (CIA) and the weathering index of parker (WIP) were applied to evaluate the chemical weathering intensity of palaeoflood SWD and modern flood SWD in the upper Hanjiang River.The average CIA value of palaeoflood SWD was 64,whereas modern flood SWD was 60.Moreover,the average WIP value of palaeoflood SWD was also close to that of modern flood SWD.On the other hand,the triangle diagram ACNK of flood SWD showed that the weathering intensity of palaeoflood SWDs was intermediate weathering,while modern flood SWD was weak weathering.In addition,Modern flood SWD was a tool for evaluating floodrelated environment impacts on heavy metal concentrations within river sediments,which affect river and groundwater quality,soil quality and floodplain systems.The sources of modern flood SWD were mainly from soil erosion on modern ground during flood periods.Heavy metals Zn,Co,Cr,V and Ba content of modern flood SWD were higher than palaeoflood SWD 16%,60%,20%,77%,42%,respectively.UCCnormalized abundances of Zn,Co,Cr,V and Ba of modern flood SWD were obviously higher than that of palaeoflood SWD.The phenomenon implied that modern flood SWD significantly influenced by heavy metals of anthropogenic input on the Hanjiang drainage basin.The differences of chemical weathering and anthropogenic impact on the hydroclimatic system of the upper Hanjiang River basin were indicated by geochemical character of extraordinary floods in the long timescale.These results enlarge the knowledge of the relationship between human activities and natural weathering,at the same time,they are important for understanding soil and water conservation and ecological environment during flood period in the upper Hanjiang River

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] NIE Na,YU Kunxiang. ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC ACCOUNTS THOUGHTS ON TOURIST INDUSTRY IN CHINESE WORLD NATURAL HERITAGE SITE[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2009, 18(2): 121 .
[2] CAO Yingui, WANG Jing, CHENG Ye, LIU Aixia,XU Ning, HAO Yin, RAO Caixia. LAND USE CHANGE AND INFLUENTIAL FACTORS IN RESERVOIR AREA OF THREE GORGES[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2007, 16(6): 748 .
[3] XU Junjie, HE Qing, LIU Hong, CHEN Jiyu. PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF CHARACTERISTICS OF THE EXCEPTIONAL LOW DISCHARGE AND ITS CAUSE OVER THE YANGTZE RIVER|2006[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2008, 17(5): 716 .
[4] YOU Qinglong,KANG Shichang, LI Chaoliu,YAN Yuping,YAN Shiyue. CHANGE IN EXTREME TEMPERATURE OVER SANJIANGYUAN REGION IN THE PERIOD FROM 1961 TO 2005[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2008, 17(2): 232 .
[5] WU Bingfang, LUO Zhimin. ECOSYSTEM HEALTH ASSESSMENT OF DANINGHE RIVER BASIN |IN THE THREE GORGES RESERVOIR BASED ON REMOTE SENSING[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2007, 16(1): 102 -106 .
[6] HAO Hongsheng, LI Kefeng, LI Ran, ZHAO Zaixing. ON THE INFLUENCE OF INTAKE LOCATION ON TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE OF RESERVOIR WITH SEASONAL TEMPERATURE STRATIFICATION[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2007, 16(1): 21 -25 .
[7] LIU Chengliang, TIAN Ying,LIANG Bin,5. SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS ON INDUSTRIAL ECONOMY OF WUHAN METROPOLITAN AREA[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2009, 18(1): 1 .
[8] WU Xin-mu,LIAO Dan,YAN Jin. INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF URBANAGGLOMERATION IN THE MIDDLE REACHES OF THEYANGTZE RIVER SURROUNDING WUHAN CITY[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2004, 13(1): 1 -6 .
[9] LI Chong|LIAO Wengen|PENG Jing,YE Baisheng . ASSESSMENT OF ECO HYDROLOGICAL ALTERNATION (1900~2004) IN YICHANG GAUGE OF THE YANGTZE RIVER[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2007, 16(1): 76 -80 .
[10] ZHNAG Xin-yi, LIU Min, MENG Fei. EXPANSION OF URBAN CONSTRUCTION LAND IN SHANGHAI CITY BASED ON RS AND GIS[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2006, 15(1): 29 -33 .