长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (04): 504-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201404009

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

乐安河流域面源营养物质输移研究

夏 雨, 黄灵光, 鄢帮有, 方豫   

  1. (1.南昌大学理学院,江西 南昌 330031;2.江西省山江湖开发治理委员会办公室,江西 南昌 330046)
  • 出版日期:2014-04-20

RESEARCH ON TRANSFORMATION OF DIFFUSE NUTRIENTS IN THE LEANHE WATERSHED

XIA Yu1,2, HUANG Lingguang2, YAN Bangyou2, FANG Yu2   

  1. (1.School of Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China;2.Office for MountainRiverLake Development and Management Committee of Jiang Province, Nanchang 330046, China
  • Online:2014-04-20

摘要:

根据乐安河流域2009~2011年17个监测断面的定期观测数据,初步分析了流域内总氮、总磷的时空分布规律。运用WATLAC水文模型和MESAW营养盐模型,对乐安河流域营养物质产出与输移进行模拟,估算主要土地利用方式营养物输出系数、产出量及河道滞留率。研究表明:该流域氮年产出量为10 4380 t,对流域出口处的贡献量为5 8557 t,滞留率为439%;磷年产出量为1 0037 t,对流域出口贡献量为3449 t,滞留率为656%。由于氮的可溶性强和流动性更强,因此比磷的产生量和贡献量都更多,并且滞留率受降雨影响更为显著。延长污染物的迁移路径和时间,可增加营养物的滞留率,减少对河道的贡献量

Abstract:

Diffuse water pollution has become one of the most important factors for environmental pollution. Research on emission, transportation, transformation, and management of nonpoint source water pollution is helpful for effectively preventing lake pollution. The Leanhe Watershed is a typical agriculturalbased watershed of Poyang Lake watershed. The nonpoint source pollution in this watershed impacts water quality issue which influences ecology and society. Based on observed data from 17 monitoring stations within the Leanhe Watershed from 2009 to 2011, the temporal and spatial variation patterns were analyzed. The WATLAC Model and MESAW Model are combined to simulate the nutrient emission and transformation in the Leanhe watershed, and to calculate the nutrient load and retention rate in river course. The main conclusions of this paper are as follows. (1)The distribution and seasonal changes of nitrogen and phosphorus are basically similar. They increased from April by the beginning of rainfall and agricultural season, reached a high level in June, and then dropped dramatically to the lowest value in September for annually maximum water volume in the Leanhe Watershed. After September, the values recovered for the dry season and reached the highest point for the annually minimum water value int December. The nutrient concentrations were generally higher in downstream than in upstream. This result indicated that agricultural fertilization was the main source of diffuse N in soils, the rainfall runoff was the main driving factor for Nlosses, and forest land had an obviously constraint effect on nonpoint pollution. (2)Nonpoint source based nitrogen and phosphorus emission and transformation in the Leanhe watershed was simulated by the MESAW Model. The result shows that: the nitrogen emission from the Leanhe Watershed was 10 4380 t/a, the contribution to the watershed mouth was 5 855.7 t, and the retention rate of nitrogen in the Leanhe Watershed was 439%. In terms of phosphorus, the emission from the Leanhe Watershed was 1 0037 t/a, the contribution to the watershed mouth was 3449 t, and the retention rate of phosphorus in the Leanhe Watershed was 656%. Those data indicated the nitrogen had higher emission and contribution value than phosphorus because of its higher solubility and fluxility. The main physical form of phosphorus was particle, which could be detained by sedimentation. Phosphorus had therefore a higher retention rate than nitrogen. (3)The retention rates of nitrogen and phosphorus in the wet season were higher than in the dry season, because less precipitation in the dry season leaded to a lower amount of runoff flowing down the river course slowly. However, the storm in June of 2011 caused huge dissolved nitrogen going into river course in short time. The N retention rate in this season was 15%, lower than that in 2010. The storm also moved some particle phosphorus that has been absorbed in the soil for a long time to the river, so P retention rate in this season was 10%, higher than that in 2010.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[3] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[4] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[5] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[6] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[7] 陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[8] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[9] 翁君山,段 宁| 张 颖. 嘉兴双桥农场大气颗粒物的物理化学特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 129 .
[10] 王书国,段学军,姚士谋. 长江三角洲地区人口空间演变特征及动力机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 405 .