长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (10): 1418-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201410012

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

县域农村居民点景观格局指数的空间粒度效应

耿焕侠,张小林,李红波   

  1. (南京师范大学地理科学学院,江苏 南京 210023)
  • 出版日期:2014-10-20

EFFECTS OF CHANGING GRAIN SIZE ON LANDSCAPE INDICES OF RURAL SETTLEMENT AT COUNTY SCALE〖WT4”BZ〗——A CASE STUDY OF FENGXIAN IN JIANGSU PROVINCE

GENG Huanxia, ZHANG Xiaolin, LI Hongbo   

  1. (School of Geographical Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)
  • Online:2014-10-20

摘要:

利用ArcGIS 93软件从2009年全国第二次土地调查成果数据库中提取丰县农村居民点数据作为数据源,采用中心属性值原则得到20种空间粒度下的农村居民点景观格局,借助Fragstats 33软件对选取的8个景观指数进行计算,分析农村居民点景观格局的粒度效应并据此确定适宜粒度范围。研究表明:除景观面积指数及景观分离度指数外,其他景观指数的粒度效应较明显,即景观格局对空间粒度的依赖性较强,若避开粒度谈论景观格局意义不大;空间粒度由10 m增大到200 m,斑块个数、斑块密度、景观形状指数、景观结合度指数、景观聚集度指数均下降,最大斑块指数上升,说明最大斑块的优势度上升,斑块破碎化程度降低,斑块形状趋于规则,景观斑块间连接程度降低且分布趋向分散;综合各个景观指数的第一尺度域,研究确定丰县1〖DK〗∶10 000比例尺精度下农村居民点景观格局分析的适宜粒度范围为50~60 m,最佳粒度为60 m

Abstract:

Taking the landscape pattern of the rural settlement in Fengxian of Jiangsu Province as the research subject, this paper extracted the rural settlement data of Fengxian in Jiangsu Province from the national results of the second land survey data as the main data source by using ArcGIS 9.3 spatial analysis software to find out how the different grinds of administrative center influenced the landscape pattern of land use by using Fragstats 33 as the landscape pattern analysis software, then got twenty kinds of rural settlement landscape pattern based on Rule of Centric Cell. With the help of ArcGIS 9.3 spatial analysis software, we changed the vector data of rural settlement to raster data. By using Fragstats 3.3 as the landscape pattern analysis software, the eight selected landscape indices were calculated. The selected landscape indices could reflect the changes in the characteristics of amounts and scales, the shape, the spatial configuration and the dominance index. According to the results of the calculation, we analysed the effects of changing grain size on landscape indices of rural settlement at county scale, based on which we chose the appropriate grain of landscape pattern analysis. The results showed as follows. (1) Most of the rural settlements in Fengxian were smallscale and the per capita area was large (204.04 m2 per capita), at the same time the shape of landscape was fragmentized and anomalous. The distribution features of rural settlement in Fengxian were “low aggregation, high dispersion” and “small scale, large density”. (2) Apart from the two landscape indices of Total Area and Landscape Division Index, the remaining six landscape indices all had strong scale effect. In other words, the landscape pattern was exposed to the space scale strongly. There was little significance talking about the landscape pattern without the space scale. (3) With the space scale increasing from 10m to 200m, all the five landscape indices of Number of Patches, Patch Density, Landscape Shape Index, Patch Cohesion Index and Aggregation Index had a decrease, while the landscape index of Largest Patch Index increased astatically. The changing in the values of landscape indices showed that the degree of the dominance of the largest patch tended to increase, the degree of fragmentation of the patches was lower, the shape of the patches tended to be inerratic, the degree of cohesion was becoming less and the patches distributed dispersedly. (4) After all the first scale domains of the eight landscape indices were taken into consideration, we got to know the determination of the appropriate grain of landscape pattern analysis for the analysis of the rural settlement at county scale. The appropriate grain of landscape pattern analysis was 50-60 m and 60m was defined as the optimizationscale. Through the analysis, it was found that the changes in the grain size could have a great effect on landscape indices of rural settlement at county scale. We had to take the factor of analysis scale into consideration, when we calculated the landscape indices of rural settlement to research the landscape pattern

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[2] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[3] 吕东亮. 汉江水质优于长江的原因刍议[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 102 -104 .
[4] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[5] 彭刚华,黄良英. 长江水质评价和预测模型探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 77 -82 .
[6] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[7] 陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[8] 张 雷,吴映梅. 长江干流地区区域发展与国家工业化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 633 -637 .
[9] 魏 伟,周 婕,许 峰. 大城市边缘区土地利用时空格局模拟——以武汉市洪山区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 174 -179 .
[10] 翁君山,段 宁| 张 颖. 嘉兴双桥农场大气颗粒物的物理化学特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 129 .