长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (08): 1801-1810.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201908005

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

长三角城市群旅游场强时空异质性及演化机理

胡美娟1,沈一忱1,郭向阳1,丁正山1*,张允翔1,阮  陵1,2   

  1. (1.南京师范大学地理科学学院/江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心/虚拟地理环境教育部重点实验室(南京师范大学)/江苏省地理环境演化国家重点实验室培育建设点,江苏 南京 210023;2 . 南京师范大学常州创新发展研究院,江苏 常州 213002)
  • 出版日期:2019-08-20 发布日期:2019-08-19

Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity and Evolution Mechanism of Tourism Field Strength in Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration

HU Mei-juan1, SHEN Yi-chen1, GUO Xiang-yang1,DING Zheng-shan1, ZHANG Yun-xiang1, RUAN Ling1,2   

  1. (1.School of Geography Science, Nanjing Normal University, Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment (Nanjing Normal University), Ministry of Education, State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base of Geographical Environment Evolution (Jiangsu Province), Nanjing 210023, China; 2.Changzhou Institute of Innovation and Development, Nanjing Normal University, Changzhou 213002,  China)
  • Online:2019-08-20 Published:2019-08-19

摘要:  以长江三角洲城市群26个城市为研究单元,综合运用主成分因子分析、可达性分析、改进的场强模型、地理探测器模型等方法对2000~2016年长江三角洲城市群区域旅游场强时空格局的演化及其形成机理展开研究。结果表明:(1)长三角城市群城市旅游综合规模差异化显著,但趋于均衡化发展态势;(2)区域旅游场强具有明显的时空异质性,交通“轴线”扩散明显,空间结构由最初的“Z”字型发展为“网状”,最后演变为“树枝状”,旅游场强类型呈现稳定的圈层包围结构,不断地由低级向高级演变;(3)旅游场强格局演化主要由交通优势度、旅游产业发展水平、地区经济发展水平、旅游资源禀赋和政策导向等多方面因素共同作用形成的结果。

Abstract: The field intensity model uses the concept of physics to represent the tourism influence of node cities with “tourism field intensity” with regarding cities in the urban agglomeration as “field source points”. The interaction between field source points are forming force lines with different strength and the compound field groups are formed by interaction of different force lines with superposition effect. Taking the 26 cities in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration as research scope and the tourism field strength(TFS) as the research object, this paper analyzed the space-time evolution pattern and formation mechanism of regional tourism field strength between 2000 and 2016 by using methods of principal component analysis, accessibility analysis, improved field strength model and geographical detector model. The results showed that: (1)The TFS in the Yangtze river delta urban agglomeration had been continuously enhancing, while its differences between cities became larger since 2000. The traffic accessibility of cities improved significantly and presented obvious “center-periphery” structure. However, the scope of center experienced from original “network” to a closely linked “block” and finally exhibited “branches” along traffic line. As the scope of periphery continuously tended to shrink, the trend of TFS towards equalization and network integration were expected. (2)The spatial pattern of TFS in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration were taking Shanghai as the core and spread along the line of “He-Ning-Hu-Hang-Yong” towards the peripheral “axis”. The growth rate of urban TFS fluctuated in the range of 10.54%~13.89% with gradually enlarge differences and a trend toward polarization. The type of urban TFS constantly evolved from low to high level and generally formed a structure of circle layer centering on high level and higher level cities. (3)The changing spatio-temporal heterogeneity pattern of regional TFS were resulted from the effect of multi-factor cycle accumulation. Specifically speaking, regional transportation advantages, tourism industry development and government policy guidance had significantly strengthening impact on the TFS, regional economic development had a stable influence on the TFS, while the impact of tourism resource endowment on the TFS tended to weaken.Exploring the spatio-temporal differences and formation mechanism of urban TFS is helpful to promote reasonable competition and cooperation in tourism, which contributes to diagnosing the short board and barriers of tourism development and providing scientific basis and practical reference for regional tourism development.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 印士勇, 娄保锋, 刘辉, 兰静, 袁琳, 张琦, 臧小平. 三峡工程蓄水运用期库区干流水质分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(3): 305 .
[2] 胡振鹏, 葛刚, 刘成林. 鄱阳湖湿地植被退化原因分析及其预警[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(03): 381 .
[3] 沈惊宏1,4, 余兆旺2, 沈宏婷3, 陆玉麒4. 基于修正场模型的区域空间结构演变及空间整合〖HT2”SS〗——以泛长江三角洲为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(04): 557 .
[4] 李邹, 林伟立, 徐晓斌, 张万诚. 香格里拉区域大气本底站地面臭氧浓度的变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(08): 1412 -1417 .
[5] 陈心池, 张利平, 闪丽洁, 杨卫, 徐霞. 基于Copula函数的汉江中上游流域极端降雨洪水联合分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(08): 1425 -1433 .
[6] 周晟吕, 李月寒, 胡 静, 封竞男. 基于问卷调查的上海市大气环境质量改善的支付意愿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2419 -2424 .
[7] 屈小娥. 中国生态效率的区域差异及影响因素——基于时空差异视角的实证分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2673 -2683 .
[8] 潘 静, 沈建忠, 孙林丹, 熊 雷. 长江、赣江鲢幼鱼耳石核区元素指纹特征分析及其在群体识别中的应用研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2740 -2746 .
[9] 杨达源, 黄贤金, 施利锋, 李升峰. 1973~2017年扬中市江岸冲淤遥感监测及古河道塌江分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2796 -2804 .
[10] 何莎莎, 朱文博, 崔耀平, 何春龙, 叶露培, 冯小燕, 朱连奇, . 基于InVEST模型的太行山淇河流域土壤侵蚀特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 426 -439 .