长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (7): 1746-1756.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202107021

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

淮河生态经济带农业面源污染空间分布及治理研究

郭利京,黄振英   

  1. (安徽财经大学经济学院,安徽 蚌埠 233030)
  • 出版日期:2021-07-20 发布日期:2021-08-03

Study on Spatial Distribution and Control of Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution in Huaihe Ecological Economic Belt

GUO Li-jing,HUANG Zhen-ying   

  1. (College of Economics,Anhui University of Finance & Economics,Bengbu 233030,China)
  • Online:2021-07-20 Published:2021-08-03

摘要: 淮河流域是我国重要的农业生产功能区,长期以来以追求高产量、高利润为目的的农业生产活动,导致了日益严重的农业面源污染问题。厘清淮河生态经济带农业面源污染空间分布状况,为生态经济带内各级行政主体实施农业面源污染综合防治、提高生态环境治理体系和治理能力现代化提供政策建议,具有重要的理论和现实意义。应用产污系数法、等标污染法、GIS技术等方法,对经济带内155个县域单元农业面源污染的化学需氧量(COD)、总氮(TN)、总磷(TP)3种污染物进行分析的基础上,核算了淮河生态经济带农业面源污染物的排放量、重点污染源、重点污染区、排放强度及空间分布。结果发现:2018年淮河生态经济带农业面源污染物中COD、TN、TP排放量分别为199.3、107.2、12.6万t,排放强度分别为69.2、34.7、3.4 kg/km2;重点污染源为农田化肥、畜禽养殖和水产养殖,重点污染物为TN和TP,重点防治区为建湖县、兴化县、漯河市辖区等10个县(市、区)。农田化肥污染是淮河生态经济带农业面源污染分布最广的污染类型,综合污染是农业面源污染治理中防治难度最大的污染类型。针对淮河生态经济带县域单元农业面源污染存在较高空间异质性的现实,提出应根据不同区域不同污染类型实施针对性治理的政策建议。

Abstract: The article calculated the emissions of agricultural non-point source pollutants, key pollution sources, key polluted areas, emission intensity and spatial distribution, based on the analysis of three kinds of pollutants: COD, total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) in the agricultural non-point source pollution in 155 counties in the Huaihe Ecological Economic Belt, in order to clarify the current status of agricultural non-point source pollution and implement comprehensive management of agricultural non-point source pollution. The results showed that there were 199.33×104 t, 107.20×104 t, and 12.64×104 t for the emissions of COD, TN, and TP from agricultural non-point source pollutants in the Huaihe Ecological Economic Belt in 2018, respectively, and there were 69.23 kg/km2, 34.71 kg/km2, 3.42 kg/km2 for the emission intensities; The key pollution sources were farmland fertilizations and livestock and poultry farming, the key pollutants were TN and TP, and there were Jianhu County, Xinghua County, and Luohe City, including 10 counties (cities and districts) for the key prevention and control areas. The type of Farmland fertilizer pollution was the most widely agricultural non-point source pollution in the Huaihe Ecological Economic Belt. It was the most difficult to control for the comprehensive pollution type in agricultural non-point source pollution. Therefore, it is high spatial heterogeneity of agricultural non-point source pollution in counties in the Huaihe Ecological Economic Belt, and it should be implemented for the targeted control policies according to different pollution types in different regions.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陈 立,邓晓丽,张俊勇,刘 林. 江湖洪水不同遭遇对城陵矶水位影响的实验研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 496 -500 .
[2] 梁常德,龙天渝,李继承,刘腊美. 三峡库区非点源氮磷负荷研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 26 -30 .
[3] 陈姗姗, 束炯, 徐建中. 中国若干典型城市对流层NO2时空分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(12): 1484 .
[4] 文玉钊, 陆玉麒, 靳诚, 陈博文, 杨忠臣. 德清县水环境压力与胁迫类型区划分[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(06): 981 -988 .
[5] 郑玉雯,薛伟贤,王 萌. 基于SBM动态网络模型的中国高新区效率评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(01): 31 .
[6] 吴浪, 周廷刚, 温莉, 刘晓璐, 朱晓波. 基于遥感数据的PM2.5与城市化的时空关系研究——以成渝城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2142 -2152 .
[7] 文高辉 杨钢桥. 耕地细碎化对农地整治农户土地权属调整意愿的影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[8] 马小亮, 刘桂民, 吴晓东, 徐海燕, 叶琳琳, 张晓兰. 三江源高寒草甸下溪流溶解性有机碳的季节性输移特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2387 -2394 .
[9] 苏 芳, 郑亚萍, 阚立娜, 蔡 莎. 基于CVM调查法评估城市公共绿地服务价值 ——以西部省会城市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2434 -2442 .
[10] 朱立一, 何伟, 朱璧然, . 纳米二氧化硅和铅复合暴露对 斑马鱼幼鱼甲状腺内分泌系统的毒性影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2588 -2596 .