长江流域资源与环境 >> 2024, Vol. 33 >> Issue (10): 2150-2164.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202410008

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

区域高铁可达性与居民收入协调发展分析 ——以江浙沪地区为例

金梦洁1,顾茹月1,万绪才2*,肖怡3   

  1. (1.南京财经大学营销与物流管理学院, 江苏 南京 210023;2.南京财经大学工商管理学院,江苏 南京 210023;3.浙江大学海洋学院,浙江 舟山 316000) 
  • 出版日期:2024-10-20 发布日期:2024-11-07

Coordinated Development between Regional Accessibility of High-speed Railway and Residents’ Income: Exemplified in Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai

JIN Meng-jie1, GU Ru-yue1, WAN Xu-cai 2, XIAO Yi3   

  1. (1. School of Marketing and Logistics Management, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, China; 
    2. School of Business Administration, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, China; 3. Occean College, Zhejiang University, Zhoushan 316000, China)
  • Online:2024-10-20 Published:2024-11-07

摘要: 推进共同富裕,全面提高居民收入是当前面临的重要任务。高铁作为近年来发展最迅速的交通设施,对改善居民收入具有重要作用。以江浙沪地区为研究区域,创新性地从内外部可达性视角对2012、2016和2020年各市高铁网络可达性进行测度,并探讨总体可达性、内外部可达性与居民收入的耦合协调发展关系。发现:(1)各市高铁总体可达性逐步提升,但呈现出明显的空间差异特征:上海、苏中、苏南和浙北地区城市的可达性明显比苏北和浙南地区高。(2)上海、苏南和浙东南地区的居民收入水平较高,其次为苏中和浙西南地区,最后为苏北地区。(3)大部分城市的高铁可达性与居民收入水平为协调同步发展关系,但是与外部可达性相比,内部可达性与居民收入的耦合协调度提升较慢。(4)苏北地区高铁交通建设快于居民收入水平,需要提高高铁设施的利用率;浙东南地区的高铁内部交通建设滞后于居民收入,属于前者制约后者的失调衰退关系,需要加强高铁站与周边地区的交通联系。总体上,高铁网络可达性的提升促进了当地居民收入增长,但是部分地区高铁内部交通网络发展较慢的现象制约了居民增收;未来可合理规划高铁及配套交通基础设施建设,促进居民收入增加和区域协调发展。


Abstract: Promoting common prosperity and increasing residents' income is a crucial task in China. As one of the most rapidly developed transportation infrastructure, high-speed railway (HSR) plays a pivotal role in enhancing residents' income. This study evaluated the accessibility of HSR networks in Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Shanghai from new perspectives of internal and external accessibility for the years of 2012, 2016, and 2020. Furthermore, this study analyzed the coupling and coordination development between HSR accessibility and residents' income. The findings were: (1) The overall HSR accessibility was gradually increasing; However, there existed an imbalance in the spatial distribution with higher accessibility in Shanghai, Central Jiangsu, Southern Jiangsu, and Northern Zhejiang, compared to Northern Jiangsu and Southern Zhejiang. (2) Among the studied regions, Shanghai demonstrated the highest income level, followed by Southern Jiangsu and Southeastern Zhejiang. Central Jiangsu along with Southwestern Zhejiang were ranked the next, while Northern Jiangsu was lagged behind. (3) Most cities exhibited a coherent developmental relationship between HSR accessibility and residents' income; However, when comparing internal versus external accessibility measures, the coupling coordination degree between internal accessibility and residents' income demonstrated a slower growth. (4) In Northern Jiangsu, the HSR development outpaced the improvement rate of residents’ income level, which indicated a need of an enhanced utilization of HSR infrastructure. Conversely, in Southeastern Zhejiang, the slower pace of internal transportation infrastructure development hampered resident's income growth, resulting in an imbalanced relationship. It was imperative to strengthen transportation links between HSR stations and surrounding areas within this region. In summary, the enhancement of HSR network accessibility promoted residents' income. However, the sluggish development of the internal HSR transportation network in certain regions hampered residents' income growth. In order to foster residents' income and expedite coordinated regional development, it is imperative to strategically advance HSR alongside other transportation infrastructure.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!