长江流域资源与环境 >> 2025, Vol. 34 >> Issue (1): 166-180.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202501013

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国降碳减污扩绿增长的时空分异及收敛性研究

胡剑波1,周宗康1,李潇潇2   

  1. (1.贵州财经大学经济学院,贵州 贵阳 550025;2.新疆大学经济与管理学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830046)
  • 出版日期:2025-01-20 发布日期:2025-01-24

Spatial-temporal Differentiation and Convergence of Cutting Carbon Dioxide Emissions,Reducing Pollution, Expanding Green Development and Pursuing Economic Growth in China

HU Jian-bo1, ZHOU Zong-kang1, LI Xiao-xiao2   

  1. (1.School of Economics, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025,China;2.School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)
  • Online:2025-01-20 Published:2025-01-24

摘要: 推进降碳减污扩绿增长协同发展是新发展阶段实现经济社会高质量发展的内在要求。采用CRITIC-熵值法、Dagum基尼系数、方差分解、核密度分析与空间收敛模型等方法,分析2004~2021年全国及八大综合经济区降碳减污扩绿增长水平发展趋势、区域差异与结构来源、动态演进、收敛性。结果表明:(1)全国及八大综合经济区降碳减污扩绿增长水平持续向好,但地区发展水平不均衡特征仍然明显,呈现出沿海地区>全国均值>内陆地区的分布特征;(2)区域间差异是总体降碳减污扩绿增长水平差异的主要来源,具体来看,增长提质差异主要集中于全国及沿海地区,扩绿效益差异主要集中于黄河中游、长江中游、东北地区和西南地区,降碳水平差异在大西北地区重要性日趋提高;(3)八大综合经济区存在显著的空间溢出效应,黄河中游地区仅存在条件β收敛,全国及其他经济区均存在绝对β收敛和条件β收敛。

Abstract: Promoting the synergistic development of cutting carbon dioxide emissions, reducing pollution, expanding green development and pursuing economic growth is an inherent requirement for realizing high-quality economic and social development in the new phase of progress.Using CRITIC-entropy method, Dagum Gini coefficient, variance decomposition, kernel density analysis and spatial convergence model, this paper analyzed the development trend, regional differences and structural roots, dynamic evolution and astringency of cutting carbon dioxide emissions, reducing pollution, expanding green development and pursuing economic growth level in China and eight comprehensive economic zones from 2004 to 2021.The results indicated that: (1) the level of cutting carbon dioxide emissions, reducing pollution, expanding green development and pursuing economic growth in both entire country and the economic zones had been consistently improving.However, there still existed an imbalance in regional development, with coastal areas demonstrating higher distribution characteristics compared to the national average and inland areas.(2) The inter-regional differences were the main source of the differences in the overall growth level of cutting carbon dioxide emissions, reducing pollution, expanding green development and pursuing economic growth.Specifically, differences in growth quality were mainly concentrated in the entire country and coastal areas and discrepancies in green expansion benefits were primarily concentrated in the middle reaches of the Yellow River, the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, Northeast region and Southwest region.The significance of differences in carbon reduction levels was increasingly pronounced in the Great Northwest region.(3) Significant spatial spillover effects were observed in the economic zones, while only conditional β convergence could be found in the middle Yellow River region.Moreover, both absolute β convergence and conditional β convergence presented cross the entire country and other economic zones.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孔令强. 水电工程农村移民入股安置模式初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 185 .
[2] 鄢帮有, 刘青, 万金保, 郑林, 夏雨, 黄齐. 鄱阳湖生态环境保护与资源利用技术模式研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 614 .
[3] 傅春, 欧阳莹, 陈炜. 环鄱阳湖区水足迹的动态变化评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(12): 1520 .
[4] 张鑫, 陈志刚. 经济增长激励、官员异质性与城市工业污染:以长三角地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1314 .
[5] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[6] 蓝希, 刘小琼, 郭炎, 陈昆仑. “长江经济带”战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[7] 罗能生, 王玉泽.彭郁, 李建明. 长江中游城市群生态效率的空间关系及其协同提升机制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[8] 刘钢, 刘坤琳, 汪玮茜, 赵爽. 水质感知视角下水库移民满意度分析——基于有序逻辑回归的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1355 .
[9] 戢晓峰, 刘丁硕. 基于3D理论与SEM的县域交通可达性与空间贫困的耦合机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1360 .
[10] 张大鹏, 曹卫东, 姚兆钊, 岳洋, 任亚文. 上海大都市区物流企业区位分布特征及其演化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1365 .