长江流域资源与环境 >> 2025, Vol. 34 >> Issue (4): 882-894.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202504016

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

农户生计资本对耕地利用碳排放效率的影响研究 ——以常德市为例

文高辉1,2,黄丹妮1,栾若芳1,胡贤辉1,陈藜藜3   

  1. (1.湖南师范大学地理科学学院,湖南 长沙 410081;2.地理空间大数据挖掘与应用湖南省重点实验室,湖南 长沙 410081;3.中南林业科技大学商学院,湖南 长沙 410004)
  • 出版日期:2025-04-20 发布日期:2025-04-29

Impact of Farmers’Livelihood Capital on Carbon Emission Efficiency of Cultivated Land Use:The case of Changde City

WEN Gao-hui1,2, HUANG Dan-ni1, LUAN Ruo-fang1, HU Xian-hui1, CHEN Li-li3   

  1. (1.School of Geographical Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China;2.Hunan Key Laboratory of Geospatial Big Data Mining and Application, Changsha 410081, China;3.School of Business, Central South University of Forestry & Technology, Changsha 410004, China)
  • Online:2025-04-20 Published:2025-04-29

摘要: 全球气候暖化背景下农业碳排放的贡献不容忽视,从农户角度提高耕地利用碳排放效率是实现农业碳减排的重要切入点。在分析农户生计资本对耕地利用碳排放效率的影响机理的基础上,利用湖南省常德市农户微观调查数据,运用随机前沿模型进行实证检验,结果表明:(1)研究区域农户生计资本总体水平偏低,差异明显,以非农化和兼业化为主要分化方向,不同类型农户在生计资本水平、结构和具体指标方面均存在差异;(2)生计资本结构对耕地利用碳排放效率有影响,不同类型农户生计资本结构对耕地利用碳排放效率的影响存在异质性:农业主导户耕地利用碳排放效率受到5项生计资本的正向影响,兼业户耕地利用碳排放效率主要受到物质资本、金融资本的正向影响;非农主导户耕地利用碳排放效率主要受到物质资本、社会资本的显著正向影响和人力资本的显著负向影响。(3)不同类型农户生计资本具体指标对耕地利用碳排放效率的影响也存在异质性。因此政府应基于农户生计资本对不同生计类型农户出台针对性政策,通过增强农业主导户生计资本、鼓励兼业户生计多样化和促进非农主导户劳动力回流等措施提高耕地利用碳排放效率。

Abstract: In the context of global climate warming, the contribution of agricultural carbon emissions cannot be ignored.Improving the carbon emission efficiency of cultivated land use from the perspective of farmers is the key entry points to achieve the reduction in cultivated land use carbon emission.Based on the micro survey data of farmers in Changde City of Hunan Province, the evaluation index system of farmers' livelihood capital was constructed with reference to the sustainable livelihood analysis framework.The impact of farmers' livelihood capital on carbon emission efficiency of cultivated land use was analyzed by using the stochastic frontier production function model.The results showed that: (1) The overall livelihood capital level of farmers in the study area was not high with obvious differences.The average livelihood capital was only 0.102, which was superior in material capital, human capital and social capital, while there was a need for the natural capital and financial capital to be strengthened; The degree of non-agricultural farmers was high, whose livelihood strategies were mainly part-time and non-agricultural.The structure of livelihood capital of farmers with different livelihood strategies was different.The order of livelihood capital level was: part-time farmers (0.111)> agricultural leading farmers (0.107)> non-agricultural leading farmers (0.093).(2) Livelihood capital had an impact on the cultivated land use carbon emission efficiency.Different livelihood capital structure of different livelihood strategies types had different impacts on the cultivated land use carbon emission efficiency: For agricultural leading farmers, the cultivated land use carbon emission efficiency was mainly positively affected by five livelihood capital; For part-time farmers, it was mainly positively affected by material capital and financial capital; For non-agricultural leading farmers, it was mainly positively affected by material capital and social capital and was negatively affected by human capital.(3)The impact of specific indicators of livelihood capital of different livelihood strategies types was also different.In conclusion, the targeted policies for different types of farmers based on their livelihood capital should be encouraged to improve the carbon emission efficiency of cultivated land use, which included the enhancement of the livelihood capital of agricultural dominant farmers, the encouragement of the livelihood diversification of part-time farmers, and the promotion of the return of non-farmer labor.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!