长江流域资源与环境 >> 2025, Vol. 34 >> Issue (4): 895-906.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202504017

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同模式土地整治对农户生计稳定性的影响差异

张超正1,郑伟伟2,邓陈宁3,靳亚亚2,侯现慧2   

  1. (1.湖南农业大学资源学院,湖南 长沙 410128;2.西北农林科技大学经济管理学院,陕西 杨凌 712100;3.中国环境科学研究院环境基准与风险评估国家重点实验室,北京 100012)
  • 出版日期:2025-04-20 发布日期:2025-04-29

Impact of Different Land Consolidation Modes on Farmers’ Livelihood Stability

ZHANG Chao-zheng1, ZHENG Wei-wei2, DENG Chen-ning3, JIN Ya-ya2, HOU Xian-hui2   

  1. (1.College of Resources, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China; 2.College of Economy and Management, Northwest A&f University, Yangling 712100, China; 3.State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Eco-Industry, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)
  • Online:2025-04-20 Published:2025-04-29

摘要: 比较不同模式土地整治对农户生计稳定性的影响差异,可为科学研判土地整治实践效应提供新的视角,也可为切实提高农户生计可持续性提供新的证据。在剖析不同模式土地整治对农户生计稳定性影响机理的基础上,利用湖北省949份农户调查问卷,构建双重差分模型揭示土地整治是否实施和实施模式对农户生计稳定性的异质效应。结果表明:地方政府主导模式致使农户生计稳定性综合指数显著降低0.032,就分项指数而言,自然资源依赖度、生计丰富性和生计均衡性指数分别降低0.016、0.012和0.034,收入依赖性指数显著提高0.034;新型农业经营主体主导模式促使农户生计稳定性综合指数显著提高0.045,就分项指数而言,自然依赖度和收入依赖性指数分别显著降低0.055和0.039,生计丰富性和生计均衡性指数分别显著提高0.020和0.039;相比于地方政府主导模式,新型农业经营主体主体主导模式促使农户自然依赖度指数显著降低0.055。未来应强化地方政府主导模式以人为本的整治原则,提高新型农业经营主体主导模式的项目占比,以全面提升农户生计稳定性。

Abstract: Uncovering the effects of different land consolidation modes on farmers’  livelihood stability can provide new perspectives for scientifically evaluating the practical performance of land consolidation, and also provide new methods for effectively improving the sustainability of farmers’  livelihoods.Based on the analysis of the influencing mechanism of different land consolidation modes on farmers’  livelihood stability, a difference-in-differences model was constructed using 949 questionnaires from farmers in Hubei Province to reveal the net effect of different land consolidation modes on farmers’  livelihood stability.The results indicated that the local government-dominant mode significantly decreased the composite index of farmers’  livelihood stability by 0.032.Specifically, the indices of natural resource dependence, livelihood richness, and livelihood balance obviously decreased by 0.016, 0.012, and 0.034, respectively; the index of income dependence significantly increased by 0.034.In contrast, the new agricultural business entities-dominant mode evidently increased the composite index of farmers’  livelihoods stability by 0.045.Specifically, the indices of natural dependence and income dependence obviously reduced by 0.055 and 0.039, respectively; the indices of livelihood richness and livelihood balance significantly increased by 0.020 and 0.039, respectively.Compared to the local government-dominant mode, the new agricultural business entities-dominant mode significantly decreased the index of natural resources by 0.055.Therefore, it is highly recommended to strengthen the farmer-oriented principle of local government-dominant mode, and increase the proportion of new agricultural business entities-dominant mode to improve farmers’  livelihoods stability.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!