长江流域资源与环境 >> 2025, Vol. 34 >> Issue (07): 1590-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202507016

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江经济带国家级特色乡村多尺度空间特征及可达性差异

郑群明1,2,苗珈芸1*,费文静1,刘洁1,陆佩雯1   

  1. (1.湖南师范大学旅游学院,湖南 长沙 410081;2. 湖南师范大学研学旅行研究院 ,湖南 长沙 410081)
  • 出版日期:2025-07-20 发布日期:2025-07-23

Multi-scale Spatial Characteristics and Accessibility of National-level Villages in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

ZHENG Qun-ming1,2, MIAO Jia-yun1,FEI Wen-jing1,LIU Jie1,LU Pei-wen1    

  1. (1. College of Tourism, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China;2. Research Institute for Educational Tourism, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)
  • Online:2025-07-20 Published:2025-07-23

摘要: 国家级特色乡村是乡村产业振兴与城市休闲旅游的示范和典型,系统分析其空间分布与可达性差异格局有助于差异化保护与利用国家级特色乡村资源,促进特色乡村统筹发展。以长江经济带5类国家级特色乡村为研究对象,运用GIS空间分析方法与数理统计方法,从不同空间尺度刻画长江经济带国家级特色乡村空间分布与可达性差异格局。结果表明:(1)5类特色乡村均具有典型的集聚性特征,集聚强度呈“传统村落>少数民族特色村寨>森林乡村>历史文化名村>乡村旅游重点村”的位序格局;(2)5类特色乡村核密度呈一高四低,空间分异鲜明的类型特征,地级及以上城市尺度非均衡度均高于省域尺度,数量分布均衡度较差;(3)5类特色乡村空间可达性地域分异显著,内部差异突出,除少数民族特色村寨可达性“西强东弱”外,其余四大特色乡村可达性均呈现“东高西低”的空间格局;(4)5类国家级特色乡村县域单元可达性受“沪昆”高铁与“沪汉蓉”快速客运通道两大横向铁路影响较大,均大致以成都—昆明线为界,呈“东高西低”的空间格局;(5)在一日游、二日游、三日游、五日游、七日游旅游圈情形下,特色乡村日常可达性优势城市分别对应杭州、南昌、南昌、贵州、贵州。

Abstract: As an important carrier of rural revitalization and urban and rural leisure tourism, systematic analysis of the spatial distribution and accessibility of national-level villages is helpful to make rational use of rural resources and promote the comprehensive development of regional rural tourism. This study took five types of national-level villages in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, namely historical and cultural villages, traditional Chinese villages, ethnic minority characteristic villages, forest villages and key villages of rural tourism, as the research objects. The GIS spatial analysis method and mathematical statistics method were used to describe the spatial distribution and accessibility difference pattern of the villages from different spatial scales. The results showed that: (1) The spatial distribution types of the five types of villages all had typical agglomeration characteristic. The agglomeration intensity showed a sequence pattern of "traditional villages> ethnic villages > forest villages> historical and cultural villages> key rural tourism villages "; (2) The non-equilibrium degree of cities at the prefecture level and above in the five types of villages was higher than that at the provincial level, and the balance degree of quantity distribution was poor; (3) The spatial accessibility of the five types of villages was significantly differentiated. The internal differences were prominent, except for the accessibility of ethnic minority characteristic villages, which was "strong in the west and weak in the east". The accessibility of the other four characteristic villages showed a spatial pattern of "high in the east and low in the west"; (4) The accessibility of county units in five types of villages was affected; (5) Under the case of one-day, two-day, three-day, five-day and seven-day tours, the cities with daily accessibility advantages were identified as Hangzhou, Nanchang, Nanchang, Guizhou and Guizhou

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!