长江流域资源与环境 >> 2025, Vol. 34 >> Issue (10): 2145-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202510001

• 区域可持续发展 •    下一篇

长江经济带数字产业的空间格局演化及驱动因素分析——来自微观企业数据的证据

柏玲1,于雨欣1,姜磊2,3*,廖同辉1   

  1. (1. 南昌大学经济管理学院,江西 南昌 330031;2. 广州大学地理科学与遥感学院,广东 广州 510006;3. 广州大学华南人文地理与城市发展中心,广东 广州 510006)
  • 出版日期:2025-10-20 发布日期:2025-10-23

Spatial Pattern of Digital Industry in the Yangtze River Economic Belt and Driving Factors: Evidence from Firm-level Data

BAI Ling1,YU Yu-xin1,JIANG Lei2,3,LIAO Tong-hui 1   

  1. (1.School of Economics and Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China;2. School of Geography and Remote Sensing,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 510006,China; 3. Center for Human Geography and Urban Development, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)
  • Online:2025-10-20 Published:2025-10-23

摘要: 数字产业作为战略性新兴产业是推动长江经济带高质量发展,构建区域竞争新优势的重要驱动力。探究长江经济带数字产业时空格局演化及驱动因素对优化数字产业布局具有重要的现实意义。基于长江经济带2000~2020年30多万家数字企业数据,采用描述性统计、标准差椭圆和多尺度地理加权回归模型方法,分析其时空格局演化特征及驱动因素。研究结果表明:(1)总体上,数字企业数量呈现显著上升趋势,空间分布上表现出“下游城市核心突出,中上游城市逐步扩张”的特征。(2)分行业来看,数字产品生产业呈现“下游集聚核心突出,中上游以省会城市为核心逐步扩张”的特征;数字产品服务业表现出“中下游城市连接紧密,下游连片集聚”的特点;数字要素支撑与技术新兴产业呈现 “以省会城市为核心,多核心片状分布”的特征。(3)数字产业的空间分布总体上受区位、市场、技术和制度等多种因素影响,并且各驱动因素作用具有明显的空间异质性;此外,不同类型的数字产业驱动因素影响也存在差异,数字产品生产企业选址较注重区位因素,具有路径依赖性;数字产品服务业选址主要侧重于消费者和市场,具有路径创造性;而数字要素支撑与技术新兴产业选址兼有路径依赖和路径创造性。

Abstract: As a strategic emerging industry, digital industry is an important driving force to promote the high-quality development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) and construct a new advantage in regional competition. Exploring the evolution of the spatio-temporal pattern and driving factors of digital industry in the YREB is of great practical significance for optimizing the layout of digital industry. Based on the data of more than 300 000 digital enterprises from 2000 to 2020, this study used the descriptive statistics, standard deviational ellipse and multi-scale geographically weighted regression modelling methods to conduct a research. The results showed that: (1) The number of digital enterprises increased significantly during. The spatial distribution of the digital industry showed that “the core of the downstream cities was prominent, and the middle and upper reaches of the cities were gradually expanding”. (2)In terms of sub-industry, the digital product production industry showed a trend of “prominent downstream agglomeration core, and gradual expansion of the middle and upper reaches with the provincial capital city as the core”. The digital product service industry showed the characteristics of “close connection between the middle and lower reaches of the city, and continuous agglomeration in the lower reaches”. The digital factor support and technology emerging industry showed a trend of “the provincial capital city being the core, and a multi-core piecewise distribution”.(3)The spatial distribution of digital industries was generally affected by a variety of factors such as location, market, technology and institutions. The role of each driver was spatially heterogeneous. In addition, there existed differences in the impact of different types of digital industry drivers, i.e. digital production enterprises focused more on location factors and were path-dependent. The digital product service industries relied mainly on consumers and markets and were more path-creative. The digital support and technology emerging industries were found to be both path-dependent and path-creative in the location selection.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!