长江流域资源与环境 >> 2025, Vol. 34 >> Issue (10): 2170-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202510003

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江中游城市群绿色技术创新时空分布特征及影响因素研究

张爱国1,李雙江1,陈香凝1,王建国1,杨朝均2*   

  1. (1. 河北工业大学经济管理学院,天津 300131;2. 昆明理工大学管理与经济学院,云南 昆明 650504)
  • 出版日期:2025-10-20 发布日期:2025-10-23

Characteristics of Spatio-temporal Distribution and Influencing Factors of Green Technology Innovation in Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River

ZHANG Ai-guo1, LI Shuang-jiang1, CHEN Xiang-ning1, WANG Jian-guo1, YANG Chao-jun2   

  1. (1. School of Economics and Management, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300131, China; 2. School of Management and Economics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650504, China)
  • Online:2025-10-20 Published:2025-10-23

摘要: 基于2010~2022年长江中游城市群各城市面板数据,借助Kernel密度估计、Dagum基尼系数、空间自相关分析、社会网络分析和空间杜宾模型,探究长江中游城市群绿色技术创新的时空分布特征及影响因素。研究发现:(1)长江中游城市群及三大区域绿色技术创新水平均呈增速递减的增长态势,其绝对差异变化程度和极化特征存在异质性。(2)总体差异保持高水平,且超变密度和区域内差异是其主要来源。(3)空间分布不均,多数城市集中在低值或较低值区,核心-边缘特征明显;空间集聚类型以低—低集聚为主,且集聚趋势相对稳定。(4)合作网络规模显著发展,通达性和联系度显著提升,武汉、长沙为核心引领,南昌、株洲等城市崛起,形成“多核心引领+多点支撑”局面。(5)经济发展水平、环境规制、创新支持、金融水平对本地城市绿色技术创新具有促进作用,而外资依存度、对外开放程度具有抑制作用;以第三产业为主体的产业结构对邻近城市具有促进作用,而对外开放程度具有抑制作用。

Abstract: Based on the panel data of cities in urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River from 2010 to 2022, this study explored the characteristics of spatio-temporal distribution and influencing factors of green technology innovation. The methods of Kernel density estimation, Dagum’s Gini coefficient, spatial autocorrelation analysis, social network analysis and spatial Durbin model were used in this study. The results showed that: (1) The levels of green technology innovation in urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River and the three regions showed a decreasing growth rate. There was heterogeneity in their levels of change in absolute differences and polarization characteristics. (2) The overall differences maintained at a high level, with hypervariable density and inter-regional differences being the main sources. (3) The spatial distribution was uneven, and most cities were concentrated in low-value or lower-value regions, and the core-edge characteristic was obvious. The type of spatial agglomeration was primarily characterized by low-low agglomeration, with a relatively stable trend of agglomeration. (4) The scale of cooperation network had developed significantly, and the accessibility and connectivity had increased significantly. A leading rise was indicated in the core cities of Wuhan and Changsha, and a rise in Nanchang and Zhuzhou cities, which formed a situation of “multi-core leading + multi-point support”. (5) The level of economic development, environmental regulation, innovation support and financial level promoted green technology innovation in local cities, while the dependence on foreign investment and the degree of opening up to the outside world showed an inhibiting effect. The industrial structure based on the tertiary industry promoted the neighboring cities, while the degree of opening up to the outside world had an inhibiting effect.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!