长江流域资源与环境 >> 2025, Vol. 34 >> Issue (12): 2767-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202512012

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

嘉陵江岩原鲤中华倒刺鲃国家级水产种质资源保护区鱼类多样性

张慧1,曾燏2*,郭娟1,胡宇轩1,钟清1,许超3   

  1. (1.西华师范大学生命科学学院,四川 南充 637002;2.成都师范学院,四川 成都 611130;3.南充市农业科学院,四川 南充 637000)
  • 出版日期:2025-12-20 发布日期:2025-12-25

Fish Diversity in the National Aquatic Germplasm Resources Reserve of Procypris Rabaudi and Spinibarbus Sinensis in the Jialing River

ZHANG Hui1, ZENG Yu1, GUO Juan1, HU Yu-xuan1, ZHONG Qing1, XU Chao2   

  1. (1.College of Life Science, China West Normal University, Nanchong, China; 2.Nanchong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchong, China)
  • Online:2025-12-20 Published:2025-12-25

摘要: 为了解嘉陵江岩原鲤中华倒刺鲃国家级水产种质资源保护区鱼类多样性的现状,于 2022 年 6 月(夏季)和 11 月(冬季),分别在保护区核心区与实验区,综合运用传统渔业资源调查法与 eDNA 技术对该保护区的鱼类资源展开全面调查。两种监测方法合计调查到鱼类 3 目 9 科 44 属 63 种,其中鲤形目种类数量最为丰富,占总物种数的 73.02%,其中传统渔业资源调查法共采集到鱼类 42 种, eDNA 技术共检测到鱼类 44 种。从食性、产卵类型和栖息水层这三类生态类型进行分析,保护区内鱼类以杂食性鱼类(占比 49.21%)、产粘性卵鱼类(占比 50.79%)、和底层鱼类为主(占比 46.03%)。在多样性指数方面,传统渔业资源调查法的 Shannon - wiener 多样性指数、Simpson 优势度指数、Delta+ 指数、Lambda+ 指数的平均值分别为 2.63、0.86、58.89 和 402.8,eDNA 方法调查的相应指数平均值分别为 1.57、0.60、59.89 和 348.93。两种调查方法均表明,核心区的多样性指数高于实验区,且夏季的多样性指数高于冬季。经 T 检验,两种调查方法的多样性指数不存在显著性差异(p > 0.05)。单因子相似性分析(Anosim)和 Jaccard 相似性系数显示,保护区不同生境间(核心区与实验区)以及不同季节间(夏季与冬季)的鱼类物种组成存在显著性差异(p < 0.01),鱼类群落呈现中等不相似程度。研究结果显示,保护区鱼类多样性处于一般至丰富水平,鱼类物种组成在不同生境及季节间相似度较低。此外,eDNA 技术可与传统调查方法相结合,相互补充,在保护区鱼类多样性研究中具备良好的适用性。

Abstract: In order to further understand the current status of fish diversity in the National Aquatic Germplasm Resources Reserve of Procypris rabaudi and Spinibarbus sinensis in the Jialing River, a field study was carried out in June (summer) and November (winter) 2022.The fish resources in the core area and experimental area of the reserve were comprehensively investigated by combining the traditional fishery resources survey method and eDNA technology.A total of 63 fish species belonging to 44 genera, 9 families and 3 orders were investigated by the two monitoring methods.The Cypriniformes had the largest number of species, accounting for 73.02% of the total species.Analyzed from three ecological types of feeding habits, spawning types and habitat water layers, the fish in the reserve were mainly omnivorous fish (49.21%), fish spawning adhesive eggs (50.79%), and bottom-dwelling fish (46.03%).In terms of diversity indices, the average values of the Shannon -wiener diversity index, Simpson dominance index, Delta + index and Lambda + index of the traditional fishery resources survey method were 2.63, 0.86, 58.89 and 402.8 respectively.The average values of the corresponding indices of the eDNA method were 1.57, 0.60, 59.89 and 348.93, respectively.Both survey methods showed that the diversity index of the core area was higher than that of the experimental area, and the diversity index in summer was higher than that in winter.The T-test results showed that there was no significant difference in the diversity indices of the two survey methods (p > 0.05).One-way analysis of similarity (Anosim) and Jaccard similarity coefficient indicated that there were significant differences in the fish species composition between different habitats (core area and experimental area) and different seasons (summer and winter) in the reserve (p < 0.01) The fish communities were moderately dissimilar.The above results showed that the fish diversity in the reserve was at a general level to a rich level.The similarity of fish species composition between different habitats and seasons was low.In addition, the eDNA technology could be combined with the traditional survey method to complement each other, and it demonstrated a good applicability in the study of fish diversity.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张鑫, 陈志刚. 经济增长激励、官员异质性与城市工业污染:以长三角地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1314 .
[2] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[3] 蓝希, 刘小琼, 郭炎, 陈昆仑. “长江经济带”战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[4] 罗能生, 王玉泽.彭郁, 李建明. 长江中游城市群生态效率的空间关系及其协同提升机制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[5] 刘钢, 刘坤琳, 汪玮茜, 赵爽. 水质感知视角下水库移民满意度分析——基于有序逻辑回归的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1355 .
[6] 戢晓峰, 刘丁硕. 基于3D理论与SEM的县域交通可达性与空间贫困的耦合机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1360 .
[7] 张大鹏, 曹卫东, 姚兆钊, 岳洋, 任亚文. 上海大都市区物流企业区位分布特征及其演化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1365 .
[8] 佘颖, 刘耀彬. 国内外绿色发展制度演化的历史脉络及启示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1370 .
[9] 侯雯嘉, 陈长青, 乔辉, 孙新素, 周曙东. 1980~2009年长江下游地区油菜冻害时空特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1375 .
[10] 姚琳, 沈竞, 温新龙, 高超. WRF模式参数化方案对江西山地风电场的风模拟研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1380 .