长江流域资源与环境 >> 2011, Vol. 20 >> Issue (11): 1334-.

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于游客支付意愿的古树名木资源保护经济价值评估——以安徽省九华山风景区为例

董冬, 周志翔| 何云核| 李罡| 陈小平   

  1. (1.华中农业大学园艺林学学院| 湖北 武汉 430070; 2.淮南师范学院生命科学系| 安徽 淮南 232001; 3.浙江农林大学园林学院| 浙江 临安 311300;4.阜阳师范学院生命科学学院| 安徽 阜阳 236037
  • 出版日期:2011-11-22

ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF THE CONSERVATION OF OLD AND FAMOUS TREES BASED ON TOURISTS&rsquo|WILLINGNESS TO PAY——A CASE STUDY OF JIUHUA MOUNTAIN SCENIC AREA,ANHUI(CHINA)

DONG Dong1,2, ZHOU Zhixiang1, HE Yunhe3, LI Gang4, Chen Xiaoping1   

  1. (1.College of Horticulture &|Forestry Sciences,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070,China|2.School of Life Sciences,Huainan Normal University,Huainan 232001, China|3.School of Landscape Architecture,Zhejiang A & F University,Lin’an 311300,China|4.School of Life Sciences,Fuyang Teachers College,Fuyang 236037,China
  • Online:2011-11-22

摘要:

运用条件价值评估法中支付卡式(PC)和二分式(DC)两种问卷,对九华山风景区游客保护古树名木的支付意愿进行研究,并分析了其影响因素。结果表明:838%的游客认为应该对古树名木进行保护,仅有302%对保护现状满意。支付卡式问卷调查结果为808元/(人·月),二分式问卷调查结果为954元/(人·月);按2010年游客接待量401万人次计算,2010年游客对九华山风景区古树名木保护的总支付意愿分别为1500×108元和4589×108元。影响支付卡式问卷支付意愿值的主要指标是年龄、个人年收入、文化程度和职业的相关性;影响二分式问卷支付意愿的主要指标是个人年收入。支付卡式问卷和二分式问卷支付意愿均与第一次调查结果无显著差异,PC1和PC2、DC1和DC2支付意愿值相差分别为062和173元,两次结果重现性良好,对本次研究结果的可靠性给予了保证

Abstract:

The willingness to pay (WTP) values of the conservation of old and famous trees in Jiuhua Mountain Scenic Area was measured by contingent valuation method (CVM),and theier influence factors were analyzed.The payment card and singlebounded dichotomous choice question formats were used,which were more popular than the others of the contingent valuation method. The results indicated that 838% of the respondents thought that we ought to protect old and famous trees,while only 302% of the respondents were satisfied with the current situation. Under the payment card format,the mean WTP value of conserving old and famous trees in Jiuhua Mountain Scenic Area was RMB 808 yuan per capita per month and the total economic value was 1500×108 yuan for the tourists of Jiuhua Mountain Scenic Area in 2010.Under singlebounded dichotomous choice format,the mean value of WTP to old and famous trees conservation in Jiuhua Mountain Scenic Area was 954 yuan per capita per month and the total economic value was 4598×108 yuan.The significant variables of influencing the result of the payment card are age,education,annual income and vocation, while the main factor for the singlebounded dichotomous choice format was annual income.Comparing this result to that of the first study three months ago,the WTP of PC2 was higher than PC1 with 062 yuan per capita per month,while the WTP of DC2 was higher than DC1 with 173 yuan per capita per month.There was no significant discrepancy between the two studies, which gives good reproducibility and reliability to this study

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘 健,陈 星,彭恩志,周学东. 气候变化对江苏省城市系统用电量变化趋势的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 546 -550 .
[2] 于国荣,夏自强,叶辉,王桂华,吴 瑶. 大坝下游河段的河流生态径流调控研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 606 .
[3] 张 静,汪诚信,白呼群,苏崇鳌,鄂启顺,武桂珍,黄玉英. 三峡库区虫媒和自然疫源性疾病分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 145 -148 .
[4] 谢 辉,张 雷,姜 巍,程晓凌. 21世纪初华中地区发展的资源环境基础[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 1 -5 .
[5] 吴佳鹏 陈凯麒. 基于灰色模糊理论的流域水电规划环境影响综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(3): 281 -285 .
[6] 陈群元 宋玉祥 喻定权. null[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 301 .
[7] 张永永, 黄强, 桑华. 商洛市水资源供需分析及合理利用对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(7): 630 .
[8] 席酉民, 刘静静, 沈力. 国外流域管理的成功经验对雅砻江流域管理的启示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(7): 635 .
[9] 但尚铭, 安海锋, 但玻, 许辉熙, 杨玲, 陈刚毅. 基于AVHRR和DEM的重庆城市热岛效应分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(7): 680 .
[10] 方国华, 夏春凤, 于凤存. 水利枢纽施工干扰区生态系统综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1193 .