不同城市化水平旅游城市景观动态对比研究——以丽江和厦门为例

长江流域资源与环境 >> 2011, Vol. 20 >> Issue (2): 137-.

不同城市化水平旅游城市景观动态对比研究——以丽江和厦门为例

郭先华,赵千钧,崔胜辉,吝涛,石龙宇

（1.中国科学院城市环境研究所城市环境与健康重点实验室|福建厦门 361021；2.中国科学院遥感应用研究所|北京 100101；3.中国科学院研究生院|北京 100049）

出版日期:2011-02-20

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LANDSCAPE DYNAMICS OF TOURIST CITIES IN DIFFERENT LEVEL OF URBANIZATION——A CASE STUDY OF LIJIANG AND XIAMEN

GUO Xianhua1|3| ZHAO Qianjun2| CUI Shenghui1| LIN Tao1, SHI Longyu1

(1.Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Xiamen 361021,China；2.Institute of Remote Sensing Applications|Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101,China；3.Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China)

Online:2011-02-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探寻中小城市的可持续发展，借鉴沿海经济发达地区的经验，选择丽江及厦门作为研究对象，基于3个时相的TM/ETM+遥感影像数据，在遥感与地理信息系统技术支持下，研究了厦门市和丽江盆地在城市化过程中的景观格局演变。结果表明：1987~2007年厦门市景观格局演变明显，建设用地大幅度增加，从1987年的67.9 km²增加到2007年的284.2 km²，而耕地面积则从1987年的729.0 km²减少到2007年的442.7 km²。1989~2006年丽江盆地建设用地从1989年的1140 km2增加到2006年的25.39 km²，耕地面积从1989年的137.48 km²增加到2000年的154.72 km²，2006年又降到146 km²，先升后降，呈明显波动。两个城市扩展的途径类似：主要通过侵蚀耕地为主要特征。景观格局演变对区域水环境质量影响较大，对旅游业的影响较小。

Abstract:

To understand the sustainable development of medium and small cities and learn experience of economically developed coastal regions,landscape pattern was researched,taking Lijiang and Xiamen as an example.This study analyzed spatial and temporal changes of landscape pattern of Lijiang Basin and Xiamen using RS/GIS.Three TM/ETM+ images acquired respectively were used to construct land use database for the studied area.A suite of landscape metrics for landscape pattern changes was presented.The results showed that spatiotemporal changes of landscape pattern of the two cities were more obvious.Urban and rural construction areas in Xiamen increased rapidly from 679 km2 in 1987 to 2842 km2 in 2007,at the same time,cultivated areas decreased from 7290 km2 in 1987 to 4427 km2 in 2007.Similarly,urban and rural construction areas in Lijiang Basin increased rapidly from 1140 km2 in 1989 to 2539 km2 in 2006,while the cultivated areas increased from 13748 km2 in1989 to 15472 km2 in 2000,and dropped to 146 km2 in 2006,showing the significant fluctuations.These cities had the same way to obtain the land for urban expansion at the expense of cultivated land.Landscape pattern changes have made significant impact on the water quality,little on the tourism industry.This study proposes management measures for sustainable development of small and medium cities

郭先华, 赵千钧, 崔胜辉, 吝涛, 石龙宇. 不同城市化水平旅游城市景观动态对比研究——以丽江和厦门为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(2): 137-.

GUO Xian-Hua, DIAO Qian-Jun, CUI Qing-Hui, LIN Chao, DAN Long-Yu. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LANDSCAPE DYNAMICS OF TOURIST CITIES IN DIFFERENT LEVEL OF URBANIZATION——A CASE STUDY OF LIJIANG AND XIAMEN[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2011, 20(2): 137-.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

推荐阅读 10

[1]	刘健,陈星,彭恩志,周学东. 气候变化对江苏省城市系统用电量变化趋势的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 546 -550 .
[2]	于国荣,夏自强,叶辉,王桂华,吴瑶. 大坝下游河段的河流生态径流调控研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 606 .
[3]	张静,汪诚信,白呼群,苏崇鳌,鄂启顺,武桂珍,黄玉英. 三峡库区虫媒和自然疫源性疾病分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 145 -148 .
[4]	谢辉,张雷,姜巍,程晓凌. 21世纪初华中地区发展的资源环境基础[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 1 -5 .
[5]	吴佳鹏陈凯麒. 基于灰色模糊理论的流域水电规划环境影响综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(3): 281 -285 .
[6]	陈群元宋玉祥喻定权. null[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 301 .
[7]	张永永, 黄强, 桑华. 商洛市水资源供需分析及合理利用对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(7): 630 .
[8]	席酉民, 刘静静, 沈力. 国外流域管理的成功经验对雅砻江流域管理的启示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(7): 635 .
[9]	但尚铭, 安海锋, 但玻, 许辉熙, 杨玲, 陈刚毅. 基于AVHRR和DEM的重庆城市热岛效应分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(7): 680 .
[10]	方国华, 夏春凤, 于凤存. 水利枢纽施工干扰区生态系统综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1193 .