长江流域资源与环境 >> 2011, Vol. 20 >> Issue (3): 311-.

• 环境监测 • 上一篇    下一篇

三峡库区支流富营养化及水华现状研究

邱光胜,胡圣,叶丹,袁琳,臧小平   

  1. (1.长江流域水环境监测中心|湖北 武汉 430010|2.长江流域水资源保护局|湖北 武汉 430010)
  • 出版日期:2011-03-20

INVESTIGATION ON THE PRESENT SITUATION OF EUTROPHICATIONAND WATER BLOOM IN THE BRANCHES OFTHREE GORGES RESERVOIR

QIU Guangsheng1, HU Sheng1, YE Dan1, YUAN Lin1, ZANG Xiaoping2   

  1. (1.Yangtze Valley Water Environmental Monitoring Center, Wuhan 430010, China;2.Yangtze Valley Water Resources Protection Bureau,Wuhan 430010,China)
  • Online:2011-03-20

摘要:

三峡水库蓄水以来,库区支流水体营养状态、藻类生物量及群落结构发生明显改变,对不同蓄水阶段研究表明:库区支流富营养化程度加重,且时空差异显著,春、夏季富营养化程度严重,秋、冬季节相对较轻.整体上由蓄水前的贫中营养状态转变为中富营养状态。由于库区支流营养盐浓度高且蓄水前后相对稳定,对藻类生长不形成限制,因此支流富营养化加重的原因是蓄水后库区支流流速减缓,使得透明度增加,水体透光性增加,藻类生长环境改善,从而使生物量大幅度增加,库区支流藻类水华频繁发生,且优势种类趋向于多样化,硅藻、甲藻、隐藻、蓝藻、绿藻都可成为水华优势种,且整体组成呈现硅藻、甲藻下降,蓝藻、绿藻、隐藻上升的态势,演替趋势总体上由河流型向湖泊型转变。但随着蓄水位的上升,水华发生比率总体上有所降低

Abstract:

Since the first impoundment of Three Gorges Reservoir,trophic state,algae biomass and the structure of community has changed significantly.Series of investigating results during different impoundment stages showed that eutrophication of tributary river deteriorated and differed on time and space.The eutrophication in spring and summer were more serious than that in autumn and winter,making the general trophic state of ecosystem shift from oligotrophicmesoerophic status to mesoerophiceutrophic status.Nutrient was not limited factor for algae growth because of high and relatively stable nutrient level during different impoundment stages in tributary river.Therefore,the reason for eutrophication was the reduced velocity of flow,making transparency rise,light transmission increase and growing condition improve.Then it brought algae biomass increased largely and water bloom occured frequently as well as the dominant algae diversified. llariophyta,Pyrrophyta,Crytophyta,Cayanophyta and Chlorophya could be dominant in algae population.Generally speaking,the percentage taken by Bacillariophyta and Pyrrophyta decreased,as well as Crytophyta,Cayanophyta and Chlorophya increased.Dominant algae succession trend was from rivertyped to laketyped.However,with the evaluation of the water level,the general occuring rate of bloom decreased

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陶豫萍,吴 宁,罗 鹏,刘 兵. 森林对污染物(SO2-4)的过滤器效应研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 628 -632 .
[2] 蔡述明, 殷鸿福, 杜 耘, 吴胜军, 李 涛. 南水北调中线工程与汉江中下游地区可持续发展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 409 -413 .
[3] 邓祥征, 吴红, 吴锋, 林英志. 基于社会经济核算矩阵的江西省氮磷减排调控方案研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(2): 217 .
[4] 徐嘉兴 |李 钢 |渠俊峰 |何林帮. 洪泽湖地区土地利用与景观格局演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(10): 1211 .
[5] 吴 琴,尧 波,朱丽丽,幸瑞新,胡启武. 鄱阳湖典型苔草湿地生物量季节变化及固碳功能评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(02): 215 .
[6] 夏萍娟, 陈芳清. 大型水利水电工程扰动区景观生态恢复与建设的探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 21(Z): 80 .
[7] 苏荣瑞|熊勤学|耿一风|刘凯文|高华东|金卫斌. 利用多时相HJCCD影像监测江汉平原南部地区棉花和中稻种植面积[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(011): 1441 .
[8] 杜晓芹, 王 芳, 赵卉卉, 王 远, 朱晓东. 基于CVM的武进港水环境综合整治工程环境价值支付/受偿意愿评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(04): 449 .
[9] 张佳琦, 段玉山, 伍燕南. 基于生态足迹的苏州市可持续发展动态研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(02): 177 .
[10] 刘晶, 牛俊英, 邹业爱, 路珊, 王天厚. 上海浦东东滩鸟类栖息地生态修复区的水鸟群落变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(02): 219 .