长江流域资源与环境 >> 2013, Vol. 22 >> Issue (12): 1642-.

• 长江中游低湿地作物研究专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

江汉平原小麦开花前降水分布特点及同期渍害的产量效应

王小燕|高春保|卢碧林|苏荣瑞   

  1. (1.长江大学农学院|湖北 荆州 434025;2.湖北省农科院粮食作物研究所|湖北 武汉 430064;3. 湖北省荆州农业气象试验站, 湖北 荆州 434025
  • 出版日期:2013-12-20

CHARACTERISTICS OF RAINFALL BEFORE ANTHESIS AND CORRESPONDING EFFECTS OF WATERLOGGING ON GRAIN YIELD IN JIANGHAN PLAIN

WANG Xiaoyan1,GAO Chunbao 2,LU Bilin1,SU Rongrui3   

  1. (1.Engineering Research Center of Wetland Agriculture in the Central Yangtz,Ministry of Education,Jingzhou 434025,China|2.Hubei Academy of Agricultural Science,Wuhan 430064,China;3.Jingzhou Experimental Station of Agricultural Meteorology in Hubei Province|Jingzhou 434025,China
  • Online:2013-12-20

摘要:

江汉平原小麦生长期易受渍害导致减产。在系统分析1983~2012年江汉平原腹地荆州市小麦生育期降水分布特点的基础上,于2011~2012年度及2012~2013年度,以郑麦9023为试验材料,通过田间试验与盆栽试验相结合的方法,分别在拔节期及孕穗期进行渍水处理,探讨其对株高、旗叶光合速率、叶片黄化进程的影响及其与干物质积累量和籽粒产量的关系。结果表明:江汉平原1983~2013年小麦拔节期至孕穗期1/3以上年份同期降水量在802 mm以上,极限降雨量达1944 mm,即较多年份有渍害风险;进一步研究表明拔节期渍水和孕穗期渍水均导致旗叶光合速率降低,叶片黄化进程加快,其中孕穗期渍水对以上指标的影响大于拔节期;拔节期渍水和孕穗期渍水均导致株高降低、干物质积累量降低,最终籽粒产量显著降低,其中拔节期渍水处理成熟期籽粒产量比对照降低163%,孕穗期渍水处理籽粒产量比对照降低218%。在本试验条件下,拔节期渍水处理和孕穗期渍水处理均导致小麦植株各种光合指标降低,最终干物质积累量和籽粒产量均显著降低,且孕穗期渍水处理对产量等的影响大于拔节期渍水处理

Abstract:

Wheat grain yield in Jianghan Plain suffers widely for water logging.The research was carried out based on the analysis of rainfall distribution of Jingzhou from 1983 to 2013,by field experiment and potted experiment,with the highgrainyield cultivars Zhengmai 9023.Based on waterlogging at jointing stage and booting stage,plant height,photosynthetic rate in flag leaf,the rate of leaf yellowing,and their effects on dry matter accumulation and grain yield were studied.The results indicated that monthly precipitation in Jingzhou from 1983 to 2013 was unimodal distribution and most of the precipitation distributed in May,June and July.Moreover,the maximal amount of precipitation from jointing stage to booting stage in Jianghan Plain from 1983 to 2012 was 1944 mm,and more than 1/3 from 1983 to 2012 was 80.2 mm precipitation or more, indicating that it would induce water logging easily.The precipitation from April to June,the reproductive stage for wheat,was also enough.Monthly mean precipitation from April to June was above 1457 mm,and the max precipitation was 4275 mm (May,1998).In our experiment,waterlogging at jointing stage and at booting stage both decreased plant height.At heading stage,the plant height decreased 61%-91%,and at maturity,the plant height decreased 19%-42%,which indicated that under removing water logging the plant height could increase at some extent and the effect of water logging at booting stage was larger than that at booting stage.Moreover,waterlogging at jointing stage and at booting stage both decreased photosynthetic rate in flag leaf.At anthesis,the photosynthetic rate of flag leaf in the treatment with water logging at jointing stage decreased 58%,and at midfilling stage it decreased 139%.The corresponding decrease percent of photosynthetic rate of flag leaf in the treatment with water logging at booting stage was 347% and 571%.Waterlogging at jointing stage and at booting stage both increased leaf yellowing rate,and the effect of the treatment with water logging at booting stage was larger than that of the treatment with water logging at jointing stage.Waterlogging at jointing stage and at booting stage both decreased dry matter accumulation,and finally induced lower grain yield.Compared with CK,the grain yield of the treatment with waterlogging at jointing stage deceased 163 %,and that of the treatment with waterlogging at booting stage decreased 218%.Above all,waterlogging at jointing stage and at booting stage both decreased photosynthesis indices,and led to lower dry matter amount and lower grain yield than CK.And the effects of the treatment with waterlogging at jointing stage were larger than that of the treatment with waterlogging at booting stage

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[3] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[4] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[5] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[6] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[7] 陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[8] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[9] 翁君山,段 宁| 张 颖. 嘉兴双桥农场大气颗粒物的物理化学特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 129 .
[10] 王书国,段学军,姚士谋. 长江三角洲地区人口空间演变特征及动力机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 405 .